Clarification with standing_sex tag

@evazion: > This is precisely why I'm asking. I thought...

2018-08-01T21:03:33-04:00

This is precisely why I'm asking. I thought it wasn't a concern about what the upper part of the body was doing, so long as the lower part, legs and feet are in the standing position. Doggystyle is the easiest sexual position to do standing, and characters tend to be leaning forward to accommodate it. I believe isn't so much about where their weight is being distributed, but rather what their position is, whether it's on their feet, their back, their stomach, etc.

What I mean is that if I wouldn't tag something as standing, then I wouldn't tag it as standing sex. The wiki for standing says that the character's body should be supported by their feet. If a character is bent over a piece of furniture so far that they need the furniture for support and can't stand on their feet alone, then they're not quite standing by themselves.

Otherwise, if you're asking whether standing up while leaning forward or bent over like in post #216659 counts, then I'd say it does.

Unbreakable said:

I think he means that he has been tagging it on those posts but he would be fine if they were to not count.

Yes, that's what I meant.

@Unbreakable: > Benit149 said: > > Wait, what? You're...

2018-08-01T18:57:38-04:00

Benit149 said:

Wait, what? You're including standing on one leg posts, but then say you're fine saying they don't count? Or is that a typo?

I think he means that he has been tagging it on those posts but he would be fine if they were to not count.

@Benit149: > evazion said: > > So I'm the one who started...

2018-08-01T18:18:50-04:00

evazion said:

So I'm the one who started populating this tag recently after I found the 立ちバック tag on Pixiv. These are criteria I've been using (which I think more or less match how it's used on Pixiv):

The receiver is the one standing. A girl lying on her back on a bed while the guy stands wouldn't count. Neither does suspended congress or reverse suspended congress.

Yes, I added that to the wiki.

The receiver should be supporting most of their weight on their feet. So bent over like post #3079886 I have been counting, but fully bent over and resting on a desk like post #2367851 or post #3143911 I haven't been counting. Maybe this is inconsistent. I have been counting against wall.

This is precisely why I'm asking. I thought it wasn't a concern about what the upper part of the body was doing, so long as the lower part, legs and feet are in the standing position. Doggystyle is the easiest sexual position to do standing, and characters tend to be leaning forward to accommodate it. I believe isn't so much about where their weight is being distributed, but rather what their position is, whether it's on their feet, their back, their stomach, etc.

The characters don't have to be fully visible if you can reasonably infer they're standing. Cowboy shots are fine. Cases like post #2367894 and post #3186166 are more ambiguous and I don't know if I would tag them myself, but I wouldn't say it's wrong if someone else tagged them either.

They're ambiguous to be sure, but reasonable enough to tag. I went into it further in the wiki.

I have been including standing on one leg, standing split, and standing leg lifts. I think these can be filtered out easily enough with standing_sex -standing_on_one_leg. I'd be okay with saying standing on one leg doesn't count though.

Wait, what? You're including standing on one leg posts, but then say you're fine saying they don't count? Or is that a typo?

@evazion: So I'm the one who started populating this tag...

2018-08-01T17:33:39-04:00

So I'm the one who started populating this tag recently after I found the 立ちバック tag on Pixiv. These are criteria I've been using (which I think more or less match how it's used on Pixiv):

The receiver is the one standing. A girl lying on her back on a bed while the guy stands wouldn't count. Neither does suspended congress or reverse suspended congress.
The receiver should be supporting most of their weight on their feet. So bent over like post #3079886 I have been counting, but fully bent over and resting on a desk like post #2367851 or post #3143911 I haven't been counting. Maybe this is inconsistent. I have been counting against wall.
The characters don't have to be fully visible if you can reasonably infer they're standing. Cowboy shots are fine. Cases like post #2367894 and post #3186166 are more ambiguous and I don't know if I would tag them myself, but I wouldn't say it's wrong if someone else tagged them either.
I have been including standing on one leg, standing split, and standing leg lifts. I think these can be filtered out easily enough with standing_sex -standing_on_one_leg. I'd be okay with saying standing on one leg doesn't count though.

@Benit149: I would like to expand the wiki definition...

2018-08-01T16:21:09-04:00

I would like to expand the wiki definition somewhat better for standing_sex, so I have a couple of questions. I'll be using a lot of my Flower Knight Girl H-scene uploads for examples, so bear with me:

1. Can leaning forward count, such as in post #2367851, or do they have to be upright?
2. There may be instances like post #3186166 or post #2367919 where it's impossible to tell if they're standing or on all fours. In this case, I didn't use the standing_sex tag. They're both against a table though, so it could be a hint that they're standing, but I can't be sure.
3. Does it apply if one character is standing, say the male against the bedside, while the other is lying on the bed, or does it have to be both characters standing?
4. How much of the legs would you want to see in order to be sure it's standing sex? I added some cowboy shot images due to context (like a table or the floor), but a cropped legs or full body composition would be much more accurate. A pose like post #2367894 is impossible to tell if she's standing or kneeling, so there's a lot of room for ambiguity and thus misuse of the standing_sex tag.
5. Do they have to be standing on both feet, or can standing on one leg like post #2693011 apply?