create implication white_camisole -> camisole
create implication black_camisole -> camisole
create implication pink_camisole -> camisole
create implication blue_camisole -> camisole
create implication red_camisole -> camisole
create implication print_camisole -> camisole
create implication yellow_camisole -> camisole
create implication purple_camisole -> camisole
create implication green_camisole -> camisole
create implication lace-trimmed_camisole -> camisole
create implication brown_camisole -> camisole
create implication grey_camisole -> camisole
create implication polka_dot_camisole -> camisole
create implication striped_camisole -> camisole

Link to request

Just some standard color implications

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1775 (forum #149695) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Why can't we just use *_shirt for camisoles and tank_tops rather than having yet another coloring group? That way we won't fracture the tags more than needed.

BrokenEagle98 said:

Why can't we just use *_shirt for camisoles and tank_tops rather than having yet another coloring group? That way we won't fracture the tags more than needed.

If not that, then maybe *_undershirt tags, since there are some who would say that camisoles and tank tops aren't really shirts. In any case, I completely agree that the *_camisole tags should go. Breaking down colored attire tags into separate groups for each individual type of garment is pointless if not outright detrimental to tagging and search.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

iridescent_slime said:

If not that, then maybe *_undershirt tags, since there are some who would say that camisoles and tank tops aren't really shirts.

Is it important to differentiate shirts and such undergarments at that level? Would *_top be sufficient?

ElGranFracaso said:

Is it important to differentiate shirts and such undergarments at that level? Would *_top be sufficient?

This was discussed ~7 posts down in topic #15562

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1775 (forum #149695) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.