[REJECTED] Tag implication: undressing_another -> undressing

@DanbooruBot: The tag implication undressing_another ->...

2018-12-01T19:02:20-05:00

The tag implication undressing_another -> undressing (forum #151017) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

@DanbooruBot: This tag implication has been rejected because...

2018-12-01T19:02:20-05:00

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

@DanbooruBot: This tag implication is pending automatic...

2018-11-02T20:02:16-04:00

This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

@Unbreakable: Sometimes we tag the exception and have a...

2018-10-02T22:21:05-04:00

Sometimes we tag the exception and have a catch-all tag, sometimes with have both versions without a catch-all tag, it kinda varies depending on what tag it is. I'd say someone undressing themselves is more common than someone undressing someone else.

@Shinjidude: It would be, though that feels like an unneeded...

2018-10-02T22:15:49-04:00

It would be, though that feels like an unneeded complication. It'd also go against the president set by things like hand_on_another's_leg and hand_on_own_leg, etc. For those, we don't have an implication from those to a generic hand_on_leg tag.

As a sidebar: Checking out hand_on_leg shows that that tag does exist, and seems to be mostly, but not entirely synonymous with hand_on_own_leg. That sort of case might be a worthy clean-up topic for another thread.

@Unbreakable: > Shinjidude said: > > An argument against the...

2018-10-02T22:07:28-04:00

Shinjidude said:

An argument against the implication however, is that it'd make typical "undressing" a harder thing to search for unless an undressing_self tag were also added and implicated. That might be overkill?

Would that just be a undressing -undressing_another search? As for the implication I'm unsure if the tag is needed or not.

@Shinjidude: I think undressing_another implies an actively...

2018-10-02T21:59:39-04:00

I think undressing_another implies an actively decided, considered act though, assisted_exposure is often an accidental mishap or spur-of-the-moment yank. There is probably a big enough gap in meaning to keep both. I'm not sure I'd use the latter meaning to imply undressing as it's used elsewhere.

An argument against the implication however, is that it'd make typical "undressing" a harder thing to search for unless an undressing_self tag were also added and implicated. That might be overkill?

@keonas: Isn't undressing another mostly covered by...

2018-10-02T18:02:12-04:00

Isn't undressing another mostly covered by assisted exposure?
At least in the way it's represented in anime.

@DxBallMan: create implication undressing_another ->...

2018-10-02T17:43:49-04:00

create implication undressing_another -> undressing

Link to implication

EDIT: This tag implication is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication undressing_another -> undressing (forum #151017) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.