tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/15710 [REJECTED] naked_* restoration 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/153657 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 @DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #1846 (forum #151976)... <p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1846">bulk update request #1846</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/151976">forum #151976</a>) has been rejected by <a href="/users?name=DanbooruBot">@DanbooruBot</a>.</p> DanbooruBot /users/502584 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/153656 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 @DanbooruBot: This bulk update request has been rejected... <p>This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.</p> DanbooruBot /users/502584 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/153544 2018-12-28T19:02:32-05:00 2018-12-28T19:02:32-05:00 @DanbooruBot: This bulk update request is pending automatic... <p>This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.</p> DanbooruBot /users/502584 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/151987 2018-11-03T15:08:22-04:00 2018-11-03T15:09:48-04:00 @skylightcrystal: I'd be mildly in favour of having a... <p>I'd be mildly in favour of having a naked_legwear tag to be honest, which could encapsulate naked socks, naked_thighhighs etc. for characters who are literally ONLY wearing legwear (Makes me think of that scene from Seirei Tsukai no Blade Dance...) It is potential fetish material, fits in nicely with an existing tagging system, makes it easier to find the specific types for those who are looking for them, and there's no easy way of finding such images regardless of the legwear length at present. It also wouldn't cause problems with autocomplete.</p><p>I don't see any real need for a naked_sleeves tag other than that it is pretty difficult to find characters wearing sleeves and literally nothing else (which is probably rather less likely than any of the other naked_x tags, including the aforementioned naked_legwear) - and most such images are of characters whose legs are merely out of the frame, which rather weakens this use as well.</p><p>The existing naked_x tags aren't the same as either of these as they are things that either do or can negate the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> tag entirely.</p> skylightcrystal /users/557539 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/151986 2018-11-03T14:57:57-04:00 2018-11-03T14:57:57-04:00 @Unbreakable: > Mysterious_Uploader said: > > I just don't... <blockquote> <p>Mysterious_Uploader said:</p> <p>I just don't see a reason on why these shouldn't exist while <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_scarf">naked_scarf</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_hoodie">naked_hoodie</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_shirt">naked_shirt</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_ribbon">naked_ribbon</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_suspenders">naked_suspenders</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_coat">naked_coat</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_tabard">naked_tabard</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_bandage">naked_bandage</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_cape">naked_cape</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_apron">naked_apron</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_towel">naked_towel</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_overalls">naked_overalls</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_sheet">naked_sheet</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_chocolate">naked_chocolate</a> are a thing. By your reasoning, these tags shouldn't exist, but noone contested them.</p> </blockquote><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_scarf">Naked scarf</a> is the only one of those that I could argue about being aliased away, the rest are good tags. The main thing about the aliases in your request is that they all contain things worn only on the extremities which doesn't disqualify them for the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> tag, this is one of the main reasons those tags were aliased compared to most of your examples in the above quoted post.</p> Unbreakable /users/430030 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/151985 2018-11-03T14:47:22-04:00 2018-11-03T14:47:39-04:00 @Mysterious_Uploader: I just don't see a reason on why these... <p>I just don't see a reason on why these shouldn't exist while <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_scarf">naked_scarf</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_hoodie">naked_hoodie</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_shirt">naked_shirt</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_ribbon">naked_ribbon</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_suspenders">naked_suspenders</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_coat">naked_coat</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_tabard">naked_tabard</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_bandage">naked_bandage</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_cape">naked_cape</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_apron">naked_apron</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_towel">naked_towel</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_overalls">naked_overalls</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_sheet">naked_sheet</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/naked_chocolate">naked_chocolate</a> are a thing. By your reasoning, these tags shouldn't exist, but noone contested them.</p> Mysterious_Uploader /users/565998 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/151977 2018-11-03T07:47:11-04:00 2018-11-03T07:47:11-04:00 @iridescent_slime: I don't think a few unrelated results in your... <p>I don't think a few unrelated results in your searches is a big enough problem to justify recreating these tags. To paraphrase <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/134250">forum #134250</a> (coincidentally from a topic regarding another naked_x tag), the existing combination tag search is <strong>more than adequate</strong> for finding the posts you're looking for, despite the occasional false positive.</p><p>Also, it's worth mentioning that with some creative tag combinations, a lot of false positives can be filtered from one's search results (provided that they were tagged correctly). The examples you posted above, for instance, could have been filtered out (again, if they had been tagged correctly) by adding <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=-variations%20-clothed_female_nude_male">-variations -clothed_female_nude_male</a> to your search terms. Yes, this requires more than two tags, which sucks for Basic account holders, but it's intended to be an incentive for upgrading one's account.</p><p>I'm not necessarily against abolishing these aliases -- <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/139259">forum #139259</a> made a good point about how they screw up autocomplete -- but I still think tags like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_thighhighs" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_thighhighs</a> should remain empty. If they are repopulated, that just means that uploaders will have to remember to add yet another nearly-pointless tag.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/151976 2018-11-03T06:10:19-04:00 2019-01-02T19:02:18-05:00 @Mysterious_Uploader: remove alias naked_boots -> boots remove alias... <p>remove alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_boots" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_boots</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/boots">boots</a><br>remove alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_thighhighs" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_thighhighs</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighhighs">thighhighs</a><br>remove alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_sleeves" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_sleeves</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/detached_sleeves">detached_sleeves</a><br>remove alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_socks" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_socks</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/socks">socks</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1846">Link to request</a></p><p>In theory, the search of [x] + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> would give out the wanted result. But actually, searching <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/boots">boots</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> will give out pictures like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3297031">post #3297031</a>, or <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3291417">post #3291417</a>. They contain boots and nude people, just not on the same person. Same thing goes for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thighhighs">thighhighs</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3304001">post #3304001</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3302528">post #3302528</a>), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/detached_sleeves">detached_sleeves</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3291414">post #3291414</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3298422">post #3298422</a>), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/socks">socks</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3208923">post #3208923</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3289943">post #3289943</a>).</p><p>I'm gonna hold off onto <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/naked_randoseru" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">naked_randoseru</a>: since i'm not Gold i can't see most <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nude">nude</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/randoseru">randoseru</a> posts so i don't know wether it's needed or not. </p><p>EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.</p><p>EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.</p><p>EDIT: The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1846">bulk update request #1846</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/151976">forum #151976</a>) has been rejected by <a href="/users?name=DanbooruBot">@DanbooruBot</a>.</p> Mysterious_Uploader /users/565998