tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/15928 Disambiguating/standardising lower-body limb lifting tags 2019-02-21T01:42:26-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154858 2019-02-21T01:42:26-05:00 2019-02-21T01:42:26-05:00 @Unbreakable: I'm not entirely sold on us keeping the leg... <p>I'm not entirely sold on us keeping the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a> tags, the rest of the proposed changes sounds good though.</p> Unbreakable /users/430030 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154561 2019-02-08T13:33:07-05:00 2019-02-08T13:33:41-05:00 @AngryZapdos: > Lacrimosa said: > > I'd say to nuke leg lift... <blockquote> <p>Lacrimosa said:</p> <p>I'd say to nuke <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a>. <br>Those three can all be expressed via <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a>.</p> </blockquote><p>leg_lift is meant for posts where <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3243718">one leg is lifted away from the other non-lifted leg so they are spread apart</a>. It's currently very misused but I'm quite sure that this stems from how similar the tag sounds to all the other limb-lifting tags, which is why I suggested raised_leg as the new name - it breaks away from that established naming format quite significantly.</p><p>That being said, it could quite possibly be a simple enough matter to nuke it and instead search for "leg_up spread_legs". I vote for it to stay, but I also understand why some might consider it unnecessary and I'd understand if it was just dropped entirely.</p><blockquote> <p>keonas said:</p> <p>As for another set, i've tried to make knee(s) up into a thing several times already - as a way to distinguish the images where characters don't just have their legs straight, and also for particular kicks - but they kept getting cleaned up or nuked. <br>So i don't know how much success they'll have now.</p> </blockquote><p>knee_up and knees_up are supposed to be used only for sitting and lying characters. However, until now the only one that mentioned this in its wiki was knees_up, so that may be where the confusion stems from.</p><blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Opposed to retiring <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot_up</a>. It's newer than most of the other tags and unpopulated but it may be useful for differentiating between standing poses where only the foot is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2989385">post #2989385</a>) and those where the entire leg is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3302929">post #3302929</a>). <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">Leg up</a> alone isn't enough to accomplish this.</p> </blockquote><p>I considered this, but <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts?tags=leg_up&amp;limit=50">a quick glance at the most recent results for leg_up</a> shows that most users (correctly) add this tag whenever the leg is lifted off of the ground whilst standing, regardless of whether the only raised part is the foot. That's why I think it's a good idea to have leg_up used for when the entire leg is lifted into the air while limiting foot_up to posts where only the leg below the knee is lifted off of a surface, which happens to almost exclusively limit it to posts where someone is <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3294121">kneeling</a> or <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3385854">lying on their stomach</a>.</p><p>foot_up has its share of mistags right now, but it has a vastly smaller amount of posts to garden than leg_up. This low post count also means it's very unlikely that we'd be trying to uproot any tagging habits ingrained into users' heads.</p> AngryZapdos /users/527891 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154550 2019-02-07T20:58:36-05:00 2019-02-07T20:58:36-05:00 @Lacrimosa: > iridescent_slime said: > > Opposed to... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Opposed to retiring <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot_up</a>. It's newer than most of the other tags and unpopulated but it may be useful for differentiating between standing poses where only the foot is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2989385">post #2989385</a>) and those where the entire leg is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3302929">post #3302929</a>). <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">Leg up</a> alone isn't enough to accomplish this.</p> <p>Also, maybe it's just me, but I feel that using <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> for kneeling poses is really awkward. How can you lift your leg when your weight is on it?? Tagging posts like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3294121">post #3294121</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2908936">post #2908936</a> as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a> is much more intuitive.</p> </blockquote><p>In the first post the weight of the body is still only hold by one leg. I don't know if the foot need to be higher than the knee for leg(s) up to apply. It's still a solid definition if we were to go with that. </p><p>For the rest, yeah seems about right. </p> Lacrimosa /users/570925 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154549 2019-02-07T20:54:52-05:00 2019-02-07T20:54:52-05:00 @iridescent_slime: > Lacrimosa said: > > I'd say to nuke leg lift... <blockquote> <p>Lacrimosa said:</p> <p>I'd say to nuke <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a>. <br>Those three can all be expressed via <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a>.</p> </blockquote><p>Opposed to retiring <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot_up</a>. It's newer than most of the other tags and unpopulated but it may be useful for differentiating between standing poses where only the foot is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2989385">post #2989385</a>) and those where the entire leg is raised (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3302929">post #3302929</a>). <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">Leg up</a> alone isn't enough to accomplish this.</p><p>Also, maybe it's just me, but I feel that using <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> for kneeling poses is really awkward. How can you lift your leg when your weight is on it?? Tagging posts like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3294121">post #3294121</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2908936">post #2908936</a> as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a> is much more intuitive.</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154537 2019-02-07T16:52:22-05:00 2019-02-07T17:02:31-05:00 @Lacrimosa: > keonas said: > > I'm for keeping all the 3... <blockquote> <p>keonas said:</p> <p>I'm for keeping all the 3 above, leg lift and feet up/foot up.<br>They're pretty easy to distinguish and, manga/anime have a fondness for specific poses that involve each, which makes them very common and, again, easy to distinguish even for casual watchers. Also, it helps that the wikis were pretty clear too.<br>eg: girl's leg is lifted by the guy during sex || character lies on their stomach, with their feet up || etc.</p> </blockquote><p>I don't really underatand that point. <br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">Leg lift</a> apparently used to be a tag where the legs are up in a lying position, i.e. a position where the other leg doesn't hold the bodies weight. <br>If we switch leg lift with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lying">lying</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> then that's one problem less. A <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=Feet%20up">Feet up</a> looks like a search that could be covered by a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=on_stomach%20legs_up">on_stomach legs_up</a> search. Almost all images feature the exact same post. </p><p>Less tags to garden is always a good option. Especially when tags seem to be replaceable by another search with a more common tag.</p> Lacrimosa /users/570925 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154536 2019-02-07T16:44:54-05:00 2019-02-07T16:44:54-05:00 @keonas: I'm for keeping all the 3 above, leg lift and... <p>I'm for keeping all the 3 above, leg lift and feet up/foot up.<br>They're pretty easy to distinguish and, manga/anime have a fondness for specific poses that involve each, which makes them very common and, again, easy to distinguish even for casual watchers. Also, it helps that the wikis were pretty clear too.<br>eg: girl's leg is lifted by the guy during sex || character lies on their stomach, with their feet up || etc.</p><p>As for another set, i've tried to make knee(s) up into a thing several times already - as a way to distinguish the images where characters don't just have their legs straight, and also for particular kicks - but they kept getting cleaned up or nuked. <br>So i don't know how much success they'll have now.</p><p>On the other hand, heel and toes up look like micro-tagging to me. As with something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/nose">nose</a>, i wouldn't promote using them unless they're the main focus of the image, if at all.</p> keonas /users/149704 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154535 2019-02-07T16:24:40-05:00 2019-02-07T16:24:40-05:00 @Lacrimosa: I'd say to nuke leg lift and feet up/foot up. ... <p>I'd say to nuke <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg lift</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a>. <br>Those three can all be expressed via <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a>.</p><p>The other tags with the knee/toes/heel are pretty straightforward. </p> Lacrimosa /users/570925 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/154500 2019-02-06T18:27:17-05:00 2019-02-06T18:27:17-05:00 @AngryZapdos: This topic is dedicated to the disambiguation... <p>This topic is dedicated to the disambiguation and standardisation of the various tags that describe lifting legs and feet. But first, some perspective on why this is needed.</p><p>"One leg lifted up and away from the other leg so that they are spread wide apart: one in the air, the other resting."</p><p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg_lift</a> wiki currently describes the kind of poses seen in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3118262">post #3118262</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2854945">post #2854945</a>. However, its non-intuitive/ambiguous name has led to it being used in place of <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/2707183">legs_up</a>, <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3361101">leg_up</a>, <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3151479">knees_up</a>, <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/2582043">knee_up</a> and <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/2707183">feet_up</a>, just to name a few.<br>While researching this, I discovered that all of these legs/feet tags with the "_up" suffix are as commonly misused as the others, with the only wiki standardisation being between <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs_up</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg_up</a> (and even that isn't 100%). I propose concretely defining and standardising all of these tags, and at the very least tag gardening the most recent posts featuring them so users who don't use wikis see the recent examples as correct rather than a mix of correct/incorrect.</p><h4>legs_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote><p>Any position in which both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">legs</a> are thrust upward into the air, rather than resting on a surface.</p></blockquote> <p>To me at least, this wording gives the impression that legs_up only applies when the legs are outstretched as if standing on tiptoes. The "rather than resting on a surface" part also seems redundant, given that something cannot rest on a surface and be in the air at the same time. I propose changing the legs_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>Any position in which both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">legs</a> are lifted into the air.</p> <p>If the character's knees are on the ground with both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">feet</a> lifted into the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet up</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3000327">post #3000327</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3393634">post #3393634</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3280384">post #3280384</a></p> </div> </div><h4>leg_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote><p>Any position where a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">leg</a> is lifted into the air, rather than resting on a surface.</p></blockquote> <p>I wouldn't change much here - simply adding a disambiguation note and removing the mention of being on a surface like what I proposed for legs_up seems enough. I propose changing the leg_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>Any position where a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">leg</a> is lifted into the air.</p> <p>If one or both of the character's knees are on the ground with a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">foot</a> connected to a grounded knee lifted into the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3408260">post #3408260</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3378968">post #3378968</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2561766">post #2561766</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3404330">post #3404330</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>leg_lift</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_lift">leg_lift</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote><p>One leg lifted up and away from the other leg so that they are <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/spread_legs">spread</a> wide apart: one in the air, the other resting.</p></blockquote> <p>As I highlighted earlier, this tag is probably the most misused of all of those listed here. The initial wiki version mentions that the character must be in a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lying">lying</a> pose, but the original author quickly changed it to remove this. Perhaps they felt it was simply common sense and therefore didn't need to be a part of the wiki, or they realised that <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/2436252">some standing posts should fit the criteria</a>. Whatever the reason, its name is too similar to the other *_up tags for a few disambiguation notes in a wiki to stop it from being misused. I propose completely renaming the tag to <strong>raised_leg</strong> and creating a new wiki for it:</p> <blockquote> <p>One leg <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">lifted up</a> and away from the other leg so that they are <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/spread_legs">spread</a> wide apart: one in the air, the other resting or supporting the body.</p> <p>For a leg lifted into the air but not spread apart from the other, see <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>.</p> <p>For a foot lifted into the air while the knee remains on the ground, see <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot up</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>The definition that this tag has gone by all these years actually means that every leg_lift (or raised_leg) post that is tagged correctly should also be tagged leg_up, so once this tag is finally cleaned up it should also probably imply leg_up.</p> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2436252">post #2436252</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3118262">post #3118262</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2608496">post #2608496</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>knees_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/knees_up">knees_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote><p>When one's knees are in the air as a result of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sitting">sitting</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lying">lying</a> with bent legs.</p></blockquote> <p>knees_up could go one of two ways due to posts such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3250209">post #3250209</a> - either we make a flat rule that if the feet are off of the ground it counts as legs_up instead, or we say that if the feet are off the ground but still lower than the knees then it can count as both knees_up and legs_up. Personally, I believe the latter is the better choice. I propose changing the knees_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>When one's knees are in the air as a result of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sitting">sitting</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lying">lying</a> with bent legs.</p> <p>If the feet are also <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3250209">lifted into the air but remain lower than the knees</a>, then also add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a>. If the feet are lifted to the same level or higher than the knees, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> and not knees_up.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3406489">post #3406489</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2935871">post #2935871</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2724883">post #2724883</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>knee_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/knee_up">knee_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote><p>A single knee is raised into the air. For <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/kneeling">kneeling</a> on only <strong>one knee</strong>, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_knee">one knee</a>.</p></blockquote> <p>Mostly the same points as knees_up, but for only one knee at a time. The disambiguation note here seems to have done a good job of keeping <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_knee">one_knee</a> posts such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3384106">post #3384106</a> from polluting knee_up, so we should keep it. I propose changing the knee_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>When a single knee is in the air as a result of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sitting">sitting</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/lying">lying</a> with a bent leg.</p> <p>If the foot is also <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3399819">lifted into the air but remains lower than the knee</a>, then also add <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>. If the foot is lifted to the same level or higher than the knee, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a> and not knee_up.</p> <p>For <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/kneeling">kneeling</a> on only <strong>one knee</strong>, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/one_knee">one knee</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3407329">post #3407329</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3377987">post #3377987</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3371041">post #3371041</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>feet_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet_up">feet_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote> <p>When a character is raising their feet off the ground.</p> <p>If you just see one or both legs being raised but can't see the feet, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>This is somewhat confusing to read and also conflicts with the current wiki for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs_up</a>, leading to users adding feet_up to posts when they are actually trying to tag what legs_up is for. In addition, I think it's a good idea to use feet_up and foot_up only for posts where a character's knees are on the ground - while it is possible to <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3404725">lift up the foot and not the whole leg while standing</a>, using feet_up and foot_up for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/standing">standing</a> poses as well as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/on_stomach">on_stomach</a> poses is a part of why they're such a mess right now. There's not really any other way to word it when talking about on_stomach poses, and if used on standing poses they'd quickly start to be mistakenly used instead of leg_up. Keeping these things in mind, I propose changing the feet_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>When a character's knees are on the ground with both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">feet</a> lifted into the air.</p> <p>If the character's knees are not on the ground and they have both <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">legs</a> lifted into the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3407478">post #3407478</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3336870">post #3336870</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2313651">post #2313651</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>foot_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/foot_up">foot_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote> <p>One foot being braced on a solid surface above another.</p> <p>For one foot being lifted up in the air, use leg up instead. For the toes being lifted with the foot on the ground, use toes up.</p> </blockquote> <p>This is both the newest and least standardised tag, as it describes a pose very different to the other *_up tags already in use. That being said, I feel that the <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3237048">foot position it currently describes</a> is still worthy of its own tag - my suggestion is to change the tag for this pose from foot_up to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/elevated_foot" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">elevated_foot</a>, which I believe is sufficiently different to avoid a majority of the mistagging it currently exhibits. After that, I propose changing the foot_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>When one or both of a character's knees are on the ground, with a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feet">foot</a> connected to a grounded knee lifted into the air.</p> <p>If the character is not on their knee(s) and has a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs">leg</a> lifted into the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3294121">post #3294121</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3316947">post #3316947</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3290991">post #3290991</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>heel_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heel_up" title="This wiki page does not exist">heel_up</a></strong> wiki currently does not exist:</p> <blockquote></blockquote> <p>I suggested this tag on the Danbooru Discord server but utterly failed to remember to create a wiki for it, or ask on the forums whether other users thought it would be a good idea. It describes when a character <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3374108">has a single heel up, resting most of their weight on one side of the body and propping the other side's foot up with their toes</a>. I was surprised when I found out this wasn't being tagged, as it is a fairly common foot pose. We also needn't consider when both heels are up, because <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tiptoes">tiptoes</a> already covers that. I propose creating the heel_up wiki as follows:</p> <blockquote> <p>When a character has a single heel raised, with the only part of the foot touching the ground being the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/toes">toes</a>.</p> <p>If both heels are raised off of the ground, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/tiptoes">tiptoes</a> instead.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3274950">post #3274950</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3339121">post #3339121</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3374108">post #3374108</a>.</p> </div> </div><h4>toes_up</h4><div class="expandable"> <div class="expandable-header"><input type="button" value="Show" class="expandable-button"></div> <div class="expandable-content"> <p>The <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/toes_up">toes_up</a></strong> wiki currently reads:</p> <blockquote> <p>For when the ball of the foot is on the ground with the toes raised.</p> <p>For the whole foot up in the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>This was created at around the same time as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/heel_up" title="This wiki page does not exist">heel_up</a>. It would serve as something of a counterpart to heel_up and describes when <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="/posts/3346725">the ball of the foot is the only part supporting the leg/body it is attached to</a>. Due to the nature of the wording of "toes", I think it's best if we make toes_up count when either one or both feet are supported by their balls.</p> <p>...what? What's so funny?</p> <p>In any case, I propose changing the toes_up wiki to this:</p> <blockquote> <p>For when the ball of the foot is on the ground with the toes raised. Use this if it applies to one foot or both feet.</p> <p>If the whole foot is in the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/leg_up">leg up</a>. If both whole feet are in the air, use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/legs_up">legs up</a>.</p> </blockquote> <p>Examples of eligible posts would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3007601">post #3007601</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3346725">post #3346725</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3407394">post #3407394</a>.</p> </div> </div><p>For formalities' sake I'm mentioning <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/top-down_bottom-up">top-down_bottom-up</a> too but I think we can all agree that there is almost nothing that a user could confuse this with, except maybe a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/shirt_pull">shirt_pull</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/skirt_lift">skirt_lift</a> combo - and even then a single cursory search should be enough to show what the tag is really for.</p><p>This big a project will require a large effort, but it's best if we grab it by the horns now rather than let it fester even longer until it's twice as awful a few years down the track. Your thoughts, input and suggestions are all very welcome, as is any effort you decide to put into tag gardening once everything is ready to start moving.</p><div class="spoiler"><p class="tn">Gelbooru rulez!!!</p></div> AngryZapdos /users/527891