Well I for one have been using the tag at times with the GuP copyright on posts where all of the characters in the picture are the overall commanders in their high school. It could also be used for other such positions, such as all gunners, all drivers, all loaders, etc. But it doesn't have to be just the job/position, but it can also be other traits like headwear. An example is post #3160114 which shows all of the characters that are depicted wearing helmets in the series. Another is post #2957213 which shows all of the glasses-wearing characters
I might support a tightening up the requirements of the trait connection tag, but then would want some way to tag or mark these other similarities.
I also noticed the color connection and hair color connection don't have the parody/crossover language like all of the others. We might want to standardize all the *_connection tags if we're going to do this.
Split connections by copyright association
So all of the current *_connection tags would either apply to crossover/parody situations only, and some other qualifier would apply to the situation of just a single copyright. The following are all of the synonyms for connection which could be *_QUALIFIER candidates.
link, relationship, relation, relatedness, interrelation, interrelatedness, interconnection, interdependence,
association, attachment, bond, tie, tie-in, correspondence, parallel, analogy; bearing, relevance
For example:
- Crossover/parody: *_connection tags
- Single series: *_relation tags
Keep the current tags but add a specifier tag
If the crossover or parody tags aren't sufficient for this, then something else could be devised. Maybe intraconnection to specify in-series connections?
Side topic
Trait connection is kind of open-ended. Perhaps it should be broken down. Using my examples from above, there could be the job_connection/position_connection tags (don't know which ones would be better), and the attire_connection tags. Then as trait connection becomes more broken down, more tags would/could be created. Not sure if trait_connection should be completely deleted or left in as some kind of catch-all tag. Or perhaps it could function as an umbrella tag?