The bulk update request #2090 has been rejected.

create implication pokemon_ranger_1 -> pokemon_ranger
create implication pokemon_ranger_2 -> pokemon_ranger
create implication pokemon_ranger_3 -> pokemon_ranger
create implication pokemon_ranger_1 -> pokemon_(game)
create implication pokemon_ranger_2 -> pokemon_(game)
create implication pokemon_ranger_3 -> pokemon_(game)

Reasons:
1- pokemon_ranger_1, pokemon_ranger_2, and pokemon_ranger_3 are Pokémon games, so I think they should imply pokemon_(game)
2- specifically, they are in the Pokémon Ranger series, so I think they should imply pokemon_ranger

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2090 (forum #159264) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

Wouldn't it be simpler to make pokemon ranger imply pokemon (game) rather than have each of the games imply it individually?

LonelyMagnet said:

Wouldn't it be simpler to make pokemon ranger imply pokemon (game) rather than have each of the games imply it individually?

It depends. It would work only if we want to keep pokemon_ranger only for the Pokémon Ranger games.

There are also a Pokémon Ranger anime movie (specifically pokemon_m09), anime specials, and various kinds of manga.

Practically all Pokémon Ranger posts are currently about the games, but post #3503402 is an exception (the Ranger guy from the movie).

Ok then, fair enough.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #2090 (forum #159264) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.