tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/16410[APPROVED] [Fate] Ishtar umbrella tag2019-12-18T01:03:47-05:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1616772019-12-18T01:03:47-05:002019-12-18T01:03:47-05:00@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2160 (forum #160790)...<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2160">bulk update request #2160</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/160790">forum #160790</a>) has been approved by <a href="/users?name=Hillside_Moose">@Hillside_Moose</a>.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1609062019-11-12T12:41:07-05:002019-11-12T12:41:07-05:00@Benit149: > RisingDragon said:
>
> Ishtar under the Rin...<blockquote>
<p>RisingDragon said:</p>
<p>Ishtar under the Rin Tohsaka umbrella is going to get yet more complicated with the existence of the Fate/Strange Fake version of Ishtar, who doesn't use Rin's body. Not that I expect there to be much artwork of her, but you never know.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="/users?name=RisingDragon">@RisingDragon</a> Not necessarily. That Ishtar would just be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fstrange_fake%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ishtar_(fate/strange_fake)</a> and wouldn't have any connection with Rinface Ishtar.</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608932019-11-11T19:44:27-05:002019-11-11T19:44:27-05:00@RisingDragon: Ishtar under the Rin Tohsaka umbrella is going...<p>Ishtar under the Rin Tohsaka umbrella is going to get yet more complicated with the existence of the Fate/Strange Fake version of Ishtar, who doesn't use Rin's body. Not that I expect there to be much artwork of her, but you never know.</p>RisingDragon/users/119001tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608462019-11-08T20:17:48-05:002019-11-08T20:17:48-05:00@Cliff_Edge: > Unbreakable said:
>
> It was suggested to be...<blockquote>
<p>Unbreakable said:</p>
<p>It was suggested to be used <em>instead</em> of the Ishtar umbrella tag, not <em>together</em> with it.</p>
</blockquote><p>Oh, okay.</p>Cliff_Edge/users/365153tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608442019-11-08T17:46:13-05:002019-11-08T17:46:13-05:00@Unbreakable: > Cliff_Edge said:
>
> If Rin gets a...<blockquote>
<p>Cliff_Edge said:</p>
<p>If Rin gets a "***_(fate)_(all)" umbrella tag, and that umbrella tag includes the Ishtar umbrella tag and all subtags, would the Mordred tags be added to the Artoria umbrella tag?</p>
</blockquote><p>It was suggested to be used <em>instead</em> of the Ishtar umbrella tag, not <em>together</em> with it.</p>Unbreakable/users/430030tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608432019-11-08T17:15:47-05:002019-11-08T17:15:47-05:00@Cliff_Edge: If Rin gets a "***_(fate)_(all)" umbrella tag,...<p>If Rin gets a "***_(fate)_(all)" umbrella tag, and that umbrella tag includes the Ishtar umbrella tag and all subtags, would the Mordred tags be added to the Artoria umbrella tag?</p>Cliff_Edge/users/365153tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608272019-11-07T23:56:19-05:002019-11-07T23:56:19-05:00@Ghost_H: Since the subject already went over being about...<p>Since the subject already went over being about just Ishtar, I'd say that a "Medusa_(fate)_(all)" would be nice.</p>Ghost_H/users/315328tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608202019-11-07T19:17:22-05:002019-11-07T19:17:45-05:00@Mysterious_Uploader: > Benit149 said:
>
> I’m not opposed to a...<blockquote>
<p>Benit149 said:</p>
<p>I’m not opposed to a Toosaka Rin umbrella tag, but then that begs the question. For similar human-debuting characters who have become Pseudo-Servants in FGO, does this mean we have to tag the human counterpart and the Servant counterpart at all times? Say if I upload a bunch of Jaguarman images right now, would I have to use the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/jaguarman_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">jaguarman_(fate/grand_order)</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/fujimura_taiga">fujimura_taiga</a> character tags, or just the Jaguarman one?</p>
</blockquote><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/fujimura_taiga_%28all%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">fujimura_taiga_(all)</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/jaguarman_%28fate%2Fgrand_order" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">jaguarman_(fate/grand_order</a></p><p>If i may add, i think we should standardize Craft Essence tags.<br>Most of them are tagged as general tag (for example <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dangerous_beast">dangerous_beast</a>), but some of them, like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/formalcraft">formalcraft</a>, are tagged as character names.</p><p>In the latter case: should cosplay tags be added to these tags?</p>Mysterious_Uploader/users/565998tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608172019-11-07T15:41:44-05:002019-11-07T15:41:44-05:00@Benit149: If we’re going to implement such a system for...<p>If we’re going to implement such a system for Fate characters that debuted as humans but became Servants or reskins or alternate characters or whatnot, we’d have to consider making similar *_(fate)_(all) umbrella tags. On the top of my head, I can think of Emiya Shirou, Illyasviel von Einzbern and Matou Sakura suffering from the same character overuse as Rin.</p><p>I’m not opposed to a Toosaka Rin umbrella tag, but then that begs the question. For similar human-debuting characters who have become Pseudo-Servants in FGO, does this mean we have to tag the human counterpart and the Servant counterpart at all times? Say if I upload a bunch of Jaguarman images right now, would I have to use the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/jaguarman_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">jaguarman_(fate/grand_order)</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/fujimura_taiga">fujimura_taiga</a> character tags, or just the Jaguarman one?</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608152019-11-07T15:08:30-05:002019-11-07T15:08:30-05:00@evazion: Yes. Going by the Type-Moon wiki, these are all...<p>Yes. Going by the Type-Moon wiki, these are all the Rinfaces we have:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin">Toosaka Rin</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/fate%2Fstay_night">Fate/Stay Night</a>)</li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ishtar (Fate/Grand Order)</a></li>
<ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28swimsuit_rider%29_%28fate%29">Ishtar (Swimsuit Rider) (Fate)</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/space_ishtar_%28fate%29">Space Ishtar (Fate)</a></li>
</ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ereshkigal_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ereshkigal (Fate/Grand Order)</a></li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/kaleido_ruby">Kaleido Ruby</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/fate%2Fkaleid_liner_prisma_illya">Fate/Kaleid Liner Prisma Illya</a>)</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin_%28lancer%29">Toosaka Rin (Lancer)</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/fate%2Fextra">Fate/Extra</a>)</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/to-saka">To-saka</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/capsule_servant">Capsule Servant</a>)</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/formalcraft">Formalcraft</a> (FGO craft essence)</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/kitchen_patissiere">Kitchen Patissiere</a> (FGO craft essence)</li>
<li>
<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/street_choco-maid">Street Choco-Maid</a> (FGO craft essence)</li>
</ul><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin">Toosaka Rin</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ishtar</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ereshkigal_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ereshkigal</a>, and to a lesser extent <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/kaleido_ruby">Kaleido Ruby</a> are the main ones. The others are very small or are craft essences (which I'm including here just for completeness).</p><p>Source: <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link" href="https://typemoon.fandom.com/wiki/Rin_Tohsaka">https://typemoon.fandom.com/wiki/Rin_Tohsaka</a></p>evazion/users/52664tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608132019-11-07T14:33:44-05:002019-11-07T14:34:05-05:00@Unbreakable: > evazion said:
>
> I would argue the umbrella...<blockquote>
<p>evazion said:</p>
<p>I would argue the umbrella tag should be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin_%28fate%29_%28all%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">Toosaka Rin (Fate) (all)</a> instead. The original reason for the first *_(all) tag, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/artoria_pendragon_%28all%29">Artoria Pendragon (all)</a>, was to create an umbrella tag for Saberfaces without polluting the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/saber">Saber</a> tag itself. That's what *_(all) tags should be for. Not for every F/GO character that has multiple skins / classes / whatever. That's literally everyone, on a long enough timeline.</p>
</blockquote><p>Does that mean it should include <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin">Toosaka Rin</a> herself and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ereshkigal_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ereshkigal (Fate/Grand Order)</a> too and probably some that I have forgotten?</p>Unbreakable/users/430030tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608122019-11-07T12:07:24-05:002019-11-07T12:07:24-05:00@evazion: I would argue the umbrella tag should be...<p>I would argue the umbrella tag should be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/toosaka_rin_%28fate%29_%28all%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">Toosaka Rin (Fate) (all)</a> instead. The original reason for the first *_(all) tag, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/artoria_pendragon_%28all%29">Artoria Pendragon (all)</a>, was to create an umbrella tag for Saberfaces without polluting the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/saber">Saber</a> tag itself. That's what *_(all) tags should be for. Not for every F/GO character that has multiple skins / classes / whatever. That's literally everyone, on a long enough timeline.</p>evazion/users/52664tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1608112019-11-07T09:42:02-05:002019-11-07T09:42:02-05:00@Benit149: Yes, that's all of them.<p>Yes, that's all of them.</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1607902019-11-07T01:43:01-05:002019-12-18T01:03:47-05:00@Hillside_Moose: [bur:2160]
Reason: This is all the tags,...<p>The bulk update request #2160 is active.</p><p>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/space_ishtar_%28fate%29">space_ishtar_(fate)</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%29_%28all%29">ishtar_(fate)_(all)</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28swimsuit_rider%29_%28fate%29">ishtar_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate)</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%29_%28all%29">ishtar_(fate)_(all)</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">ishtar_(fate/grand_order)</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%29_%28all%29">ishtar_(fate)_(all)</a></p><p>Reason: This is all the tags, right? I'll keep this BUR up for a while in case of other tags or syntax errors.</p><p>EDIT: The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2160">bulk update request #2160</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/160790">forum #160790</a>) has been approved by <a href="/users?name=Hillside_Moose">@Hillside_Moose</a>.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1607882019-11-07T01:37:55-05:002019-11-07T01:37:55-05:00@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2143 (forum #160600)...<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2143">bulk update request #2143</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/160600">forum #160600</a>) has been approved by <a href="/users?name=Hillside_Moose">@Hillside_Moose</a>.</p>DanbooruBot/users/502584tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1606002019-10-27T12:53:19-04:002019-11-07T01:37:55-05:00@Benit149: [bur:2143]
Reason: Well, now we have a third...<p>The bulk update request #2143 is active.</p><p>remove implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28swimsuit_rider%29_%28fate%29">ishtar_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate)</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">ishtar_(fate/grand_order)</a></p><p>Reason: Well, now we have a third form of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%2Fgrand_order%29">Ishtar</a> running around with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/space_ishtar_%28fate%29">Space Ishtar</a> for the Halloween 2019 event. That means she's eligible for a *_(fate)_(all) tag, but the existing implication needs to be removed before the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ishtar_%28fate%29_%28all%29">ishtar_(fate)_(all)</a> tag can be made.</p><p>EDIT: The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=2143">bulk update request #2143</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/160600">forum #160600</a>) has been approved by <a href="/users?name=Hillside_Moose">@Hillside_Moose</a>.</p>Benit149/users/248298