The bulk update request #2240 is active.

mass update light_nipples -> light_areolae

Reason: I think areolae is a more appropriate name, since some of the tagged images don't have visible nipples (post #3423314).

I don't think a tag each for both light nipples and light areolae is necessary, but the name should be more accurate.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2240 (forum #162211) has been approved by @evazion.

I agree with this, but if we do this we should probably alias dark nipples -> dark areolae too. The only reason dark areolae exists is because we started with dark nipples then added dark areolae later on, after people realized that the nipples aren't always visible. This is only a technicality though, both tags are still the same basic thing.

dark_nipples and dark_areolae have implications to nipples and areolae, respectively. If you want to alias the tags together, then you'll need to break the implications as well.

Edit: I remembered post #1531412, which had dark nipples but nonexistent areolae. Something to consider.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #2240 (forum #162211) has been approved by @evazion.