The bulk update request #2241 has been rejected.

create implication mole_on_thigh -> mole
create implication mole_above_mouth -> mole
create implication mole_on_ass -> mole
create implication mole_on_body -> mole
create implication mole_on_pussy -> mole
create implication mole_on_stomach -> mole
create implication mole_on_arm -> mole

Reason: All of these tags guarantee the presence of a mole.

EDIT: This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2241 (forum #162212) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

In principle, yes, but some of those have very low tag counts - just 2 in the case of mole_on_ear.

Also, do we need mole on body AND mole on stomach/mole on back?

Some of these are legitimate but many of these are either too small or otherwise debatable:

• mole above mouth - do we really need two separate tags for above mouth and below mouth? This only exists because mole under mouth is too specific.
• mole above eye - as with mole above mouth, this only exists because mole under eye is too specific.
• mole on pussy - again, too specific, mole on crotch exists because mole on pussy is too specific.
• mole on shoulder - once again, too specific, mole on arm exists because this tag is too specific.
• mole on thigh - yet again, too specific, the thigh is part of the leg and we're inevitably going to get mole on leg when mole on thigh isn't enough.
• mole on body - tautological, all moles are on the body. Presumably this is meant as an umbrella tag for non-facial moles. This leads towards having a whole hierarchy of mole implications, which I'm really not sure about.

I think moles above and below the eye should be kept distinct - this is both much rarer (in anime-style art and possibly in reality too) and gives a completely different impression. A mole below the eye is effectively on the upper part of the cheek, whereas a mole above the eye is effectively on part of the forehead or actually on the eyelid.

This in contrast to moles above and below the mouth, which are both still in the wider mouth area.

The bulk update request #2247 has been rejected.

mass update mole_on_thigh -> mole_on_leg

Reason:

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2247 (forum #162307) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

evazion said:

• mole on body - tautological, all moles are on the body. Presumably this is meant as an umbrella tag for non-facial moles. This leads towards having a whole hierarchy of mole implications, which I'm really not sure about.
  

I agree that this tag isn't useful, but we could follow the example of topic #2752 and subdivide it into mole_on_lower_body and mole_on_upper_body to replace all the specific tags for non-facial moles. Or create something like mole_on_torso if we think that moles on the arms and legs are special enough to be worth noting.

I removed all of the tags with less then 50 posts.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #2241 (forum #162212) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #2351 is active.

create implication mole_on_ass -> mole
create implication mole_on_thigh -> mole
create implication mole_above_mouth -> mole

Reason: These are populated enough to imply at least.

I'm still not sure about mole on thigh, in most cases mole on thigh, mole on crotch, and mole on pussy are all very close together.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2351 (forum #163940) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #2247 (forum #162307) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

The bulk update request #2351 (forum #163940) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.