[REJECTED] Tag implication mixed_bathing -> bathing

@evazion: This should be tagged manually. It may be true...

2020-01-27T20:49:08-05:00

This should be tagged manually. It may be true in some cases (perhaps many), but not necessarily all. Anyone who feels up to it can go through mixed_bathing -bathing and add it where appropriate.

@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2248 (forum #162314)...

2020-01-27T20:44:54-05:00

The bulk update request #2248 (forum #162314) has been rejected by @evazion.

@iridescent_slime: That's even more of a stretch than the bathing...

2020-01-14T16:15:17-05:00

That's even more of a stretch than the bathing implication. There are plenty of examples like post #2949964 and post #3245721 without a bath in sight.

@Bansho: Does that mean it should implicate bath instead?

2020-01-14T16:02:08-05:00

Does that mean it should implicate bath instead?

@evazion: This was previously rejected in topic #13403...

2020-01-14T13:21:37-05:00

This was previously rejected in topic #13403 because sometimes the characters are just having sex in a bathroom without doing much actual bathing. I see a fair number of posts under mixed_bathing -bathing that probably could be tagged bathing though.

@Bansho: [bur:2248] Reason: It's in the name of the...

2020-01-13T17:19:01-05:00

The bulk update request #2248 has been rejected.

create implication mixed_bathing -> bathing

Reason: It's in the name of the tag.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2248 (forum #162314) has been rejected by @evazion.