knotting -> deep penetration

@evazion: Tag manually where appropriate. Knotting...

2020-03-21T02:03:07-04:00

Tag manually where appropriate. Knotting doesn't always have to be balls deep.

@DanbooruBot: The bulk update request #2365 (forum #164101)...

2020-03-21T02:01:11-04:00

The bulk update request #2365 (forum #164101) has been rejected by @evazion.

@Veradux: Then I'd vote for changing its definition to...

2020-03-17T03:19:41-04:00

Then I'd vote for changing its definition to better fit the former definition, implicate cervical penetration to it, and then create a "hilting" tag or similar. Then you can decide to implicate knotting to hilting.

@blindVigil: > Veradux said: > > Eh, the blacklist tags...

2020-03-17T03:07:48-04:00

Veradux said:

Eh, the blacklist tags results covers ya. I only got three images with both tags.

I don't think that's the best way to judge if tags should be implicated or not, the lack of posts with both tags could just as easily be taggers not thinking to apply both tags, tags aren't always perfect and right.

Doesn't take much thinking to decide that it could be knotting but the peen is still small and not that deep. ~~Though I guess not everyone is degenerate enough to dedicated neurons to that particular thought!~~

I think it would be better to edit the Deep Penetration tag, as such penetration may occur without hilting or may not occur even with hilting should a size disparity exist.

The point of the deep penetration tag, as I understand its wiki, isn't specifically about the depth, but whether or not the dick is in to the hilt. Cross-sections showing how deep it's going aren't mandatory at all. Under the current definition, most knotting images are also deep penetration.

Right now, it seems like people are using the tag for both hilting and situations where the dick is meeting the womb but is too big to hilt. Changing the definition to specifically require some indication that it's going as far as it can go, I think, would exclude a large number of posts currently under the tag, requiring a lot of cleaning.

@Veradux: > iridescent_slime said: > > ... > > I think...

2020-03-17T01:38:12-04:00

iridescent_slime said:

...

I think I'm going to leave the hunt for counter-examples up to the people who don't use blacklists.

Eh, the blacklist tags results covers ya. I only got three images with both tags.

Doesn't take much thinking to decide that it could be knotting but the peen is still small and not that deep. ~~Though I guess not everyone is degenerate enough to dedicated neurons to that particular thought!~~

I think it would be better to edit the Deep Penetration tag, as such penetration may occur without hilting or may not occur even with hilting should a size disparity exist.

@iridescent_slime: ... I think I'm going to leave the hunt for...

2020-03-16T20:20:27-04:00

...

I think I'm going to leave the hunt for counter-examples up to the people who don't use blacklists.

@Kikimaru: [bur:2365] Reason: Respective of the wiki...

2020-03-16T18:40:20-04:00

The bulk update request #2365 has been rejected.

create implication knotting -> deep_penetration

Reason: Respective of the wiki entries.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2365 (forum #164101) has been rejected by @evazion.