tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/1791"Nude filters" - why are they allowed?2009-03-21T21:05:28-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/168632009-03-21T21:05:28-04:002009-03-21T21:05:28-04:00@jxh2154: > kyrt said: I donated and they end up taking...<blockquote><p>kyrt said: I donated and they end up taking one of my favorite sections.</p></blockquote><p>You made me laugh so hard when you tried to make nude filters out to be some kind of legitimate form of artistic expression.</p><p>Watermarks and motivators are already against the rules. Third-party created forced wallpapers <em>are</em> frowned upon and rarely approved. Third-party uncensoring isn't well regarded either. And yes, I'd be happy to see them all go. But they weren't the topic of this thread. </p><blockquote><p>Anyone know where I can find a place that actually does allow filters?</p></blockquote><p>Almost every anime imageboard on the entire internet without standards?</p><p>The discussion was had, the overwhelming consensus reached, the rule put in place, and individual deletion appeals directed to the appropriate thread. This thread is over. Other discussions should go in the appropriate thread.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/168622009-03-21T20:37:10-04:002009-03-21T20:37:10-04:00@kyrt: I donated and they end up taking one of my...<p>I donated and they end up taking one of my favorite sections. The filters were alterations of original artworks yes but by making differences it is in large part a part of a different author, The difference between say a yellow shirt and orange shirt does make a different piece of work only instead they have a similar center and different background. In effect if you plan to follow the concept of filters then shouldn't wallpapers, uncensored artwork, and etc be eradicated from the site? Anyone know where I can find a place that actually does allow filters? </p>kyrt/users/93418tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/168532009-03-21T16:16:14-04:002009-03-21T16:16:14-04:00@Magus: > homeless_homo said:
> Not really on topic...<blockquote><p>homeless_homo said:<br>Not really on topic but; what about all the images with photoshopped dicks on girls? I hate that...a lot.</p></blockquote><p>I didn't know there were such things on Danbooru.</p><p>They'd be gone if I were a mod, but I'm not so it's not my decision.</p>Magus/users/15864tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/168182009-03-20T18:47:51-04:002009-03-20T18:47:51-04:00@homeless_homo: Not really on topic but; what about all the...<p>Not really on topic but; what about all the images with photoshopped dicks on girls? I hate that...a lot.</p>homeless_homo/users/10355tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167792009-03-19T16:29:25-04:002009-03-19T16:29:25-04:00@Magus: I was operating under the assumption that the...<p>I was operating under the assumption that the people uploding nude filters after the ban simply don't check the forums much and thus didn't know they were banned.</p><p>But yeah, autoflagging banned tags for deletion wouldn't be a bad idea.</p>Magus/users/15864tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167752009-03-19T13:30:13-04:002009-03-19T13:30:13-04:00@Elfenus: > Magus said:
> Would there be any way to...<blockquote><p>Magus said:<br>Would there be any way to implement an error message to warn users when they try to upload with a banned tag?</p></blockquote><p>Even when that sounds like a good idea... I also think it would be very easy to avoid (by not adding banned tags when uploading) and then it becomes a not so good idea.<br>What about something like getting automaticaly flagged for deletion when a banned tag it's added later?</p><p>I don't know, maybe there's another option.</p>Elfenus/users/60989tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167732009-03-19T13:19:29-04:002009-03-19T13:19:29-04:00@Magus: I've noticed that some nude filters are still...<p>I've noticed that some nude filters are still being uploaded. Obviously they'll either get deleted or go unapproved, but I was wondering. Would there be any way to implement an error message to warn users when they try to upload with a banned tag?</p>Magus/users/15864tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167242009-03-18T15:18:43-04:002009-03-18T15:18:43-04:00@jxh2154: > evar said: It's not excuse, I just wonder why...<blockquote><p>evar said: It's not excuse, I just wonder why nude_filter why not photoshop for example or anything else.</p></blockquote><p>Because nude_filter is the specific subject of this thread. Other issues that aren't about nude_filters should go in threads that aren't specifically dedicated to nude_filters.</p><p>This thread has fulfilled its purpose, so I would like to request that further deletion appeal requests go in the deletion appeal thread.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167182009-03-18T11:11:50-04:002009-03-18T11:11:50-04:00@スラッシュ: > roastbeefy said:
> Can I request the...<blockquote><p>roastbeefy said:<br>Can I request the undeletion of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/332714">post #332714</a>?</p></blockquote><p>Hilarious! Undeleted.</p>スラッシュ/users/12866tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167112009-03-18T09:25:33-04:002009-03-18T09:25:33-04:00@roastbeefy: Can I request the undeletion of post #332714?...<p>Can I request the undeletion of <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/332714">post #332714</a>? It's a nude filter and a terrible one at that, but that has nothing to do with what makes the image great.</p>roastbeefy/users/10223tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167102009-03-18T09:23:18-04:002009-03-18T09:23:18-04:00@KeliraTelian: Depends on the original censoring method.
HCGs...<p>Depends on the original censoring method.</p><p>HCGs tend to have huge censor blocks, so the fan-decensoring of them tends to not work out well (but some HCGs can be obtained in their original uncensored form...), but fan work censoring ranges from standard pixelation, to a type of censoring that is actually non-destructive, which can be removed with the application of the proper program.</p>KeliraTelian/users/9521tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167092009-03-18T09:15:24-04:002009-03-18T09:15:24-04:00@Granola: Decensors are often as bad.<p>Decensors are often as bad.</p>Granola/users/97011tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167062009-03-18T03:06:43-04:002009-03-18T03:08:03-04:00@0xCCBA696: Because sometimes photoshops are done for more...<p>Because sometimes photoshops are done for more interesting and good reasons than "I wanna see them naked!", I suppose.</p><p>By the way, the ToS now defines nude_filter to include decensors. Is that intentional? I thought nude_filter only applied to images in which <em>clothing</em> was artificially removed, rather than a censorship mark or scrambling.</p>0xCCBA696/users/33844tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/167022009-03-18T01:33:31-04:002009-03-18T01:33:31-04:00@evar: > Kayako said:
> I wish you people would stop...<blockquote><p>Kayako said:<br>I wish you people would stop saying this. "There's worse" is not and will never be an excuse. </p></blockquote><p>It's not excuse, I just wonder why nude_filter why not photoshop for example or anything else.</p>evar/users/21606tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166952009-03-18T00:23:08-04:002009-03-18T00:23:08-04:00@Kayako: > evar said:
> I saw much worse images on other...<blockquote><p>evar said:<br>I saw much worse images on other tags.</p></blockquote><p>I wish you people would stop saying this. "There's worse" is not and will never be an excuse. </p>Kayako/users/44748tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166922009-03-17T23:29:49-04:002009-03-17T23:29:49-04:00@Jigsy: I have to admit I liked the nude_filter images....<p>I have to admit I liked the nude_filter images. (Well, the ones that were *good* anyway ...)</p>Jigsy/users/59648tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166912009-03-17T23:22:42-04:002009-03-17T23:22:42-04:00@evar: Am I the only one who like nude_filter? Of...<p>Am I the only one who like nude_filter? Of course there was a lot of shit but some highres was not bad, I saw much worse images on other tags.</p>evar/users/21606tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166902009-03-17T20:48:51-04:002009-03-17T20:48:51-04:00@KeliraTelian: > unicogirl said:
> Oookay. I think I get it.
>...<blockquote><p>unicogirl said:<br>Oookay. I think I get it.<br>So people have to state > "this is another version from the artist?" or just upload it and parent it?</p></blockquote><p>If you can't tell the difference, you should be leaving the uploading to others.</p>KeliraTelian/users/9521tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166882009-03-17T19:33:58-04:002009-03-17T19:34:35-04:00@jxh2154: > unicogirl said: Oookay. I think I get it.
>...<blockquote><p>unicogirl said: Oookay. I think I get it.<br>So people have to state > "this is another version from the artist?" or just upload it and parent it?</p></blockquote><p>Generally speaking, it's easy enough to tell simply by including the source URL to the images on the artist's pixiv/homepage/etc. But if you don't have that and it's not completely obvious that the alt version is by the original artist, then yes parenting to the base image (which should be done anyway) and leaving a comment isn't a terrible idea.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/166872009-03-17T19:12:11-04:002009-03-17T19:12:11-04:00@juunigatsu_no_usagi: Oookay. I think I get it.
So people have to...<p>Oookay. I think I get it.<br>So people have to state > "this is another version from the artist?" or just upload it and parent it?</p>juunigatsu_no_usagi/users/15149