tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/2446Singular or plural: Cards2009-07-25T22:30:22-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/236832009-07-25T22:30:22-04:002009-07-25T22:30:22-04:00@MC_Nobody: I would find it easier to remember card as...<p>I would find it easier to remember card as being held by characters in the picture, while card_face for the pictures that are cards. A card's face is the term for the picture on the card, but since it can be confused with face cards like the Jack and Queen it might be more confusing for everyone else.</p>MC_Nobody/users/129324tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/236632009-07-25T10:32:15-04:002009-07-25T10:32:15-04:00@NWF_Renim: > sgcdonmai said:
> Things like Clow cards,...<blockquote><p>sgcdonmai said:<br>Things like Clow cards, pactio cards, and the major arcana of the tarot would fall under the heading of "trumps". Since <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/trump" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">trump</a> is currently unused, you could use that for them, although I don't see a need for it.</p></blockquote><p>Could you explain your reasoning better? I'm not familiar with this use of the word. You left out normal playing cards and game cards, I don't think I'd want to use that unless they're included. I'd go for a tag that would encompass things like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/154328">post #154328</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/130832">post #130832</a> as well.</p><p>I think I'd favor using tags similar to that of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/photo">photo</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/photo_%28object%29">photo_(object)</a>. Images that are cards (or composed of cards) would use the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/card">card</a> tag, and cards in images would use a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/cards_%28object%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">cards_(object)</a> (or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/card_%28object%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">card_(object)</a>, however support may go) with an alias of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/cards" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">cards</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/cards_%28object%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">cards_(object)</a>.</p>NWF_Renim/users/13392tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/236542009-07-25T09:20:43-04:002009-07-25T09:20:43-04:00@jxh2154: Alright, reviving this since it stalled. I...<p>Alright, reviving this since it stalled. I think I do prefer plural, so I probably won't alias it to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/card">card</a>, but if we are keeping the two separate something needs to happen with the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/card">card</a> wiki, because it includes: "Posts indicating this tag show either charcters playing a card game, an illustration of <strong>several playing cards</strong>, or a card image itself."</p><p>...and that would be incorrect if we're using separate tags.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232872009-07-16T17:02:16-04:002009-07-16T17:02:16-04:00@DschingisKhan: I think we tend to perceive cards as a mass...<p>I think we tend to perceive cards as a mass noun. If there is one card, we're taken to assume there are more close at hand.</p>DschingisKhan/users/60134tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232782009-07-16T14:50:56-04:002009-07-16T14:50:56-04:00@NeverGonnaGive: I had figured plural to singular in the other...<p>I had figured plural to singular in the other thread because, even from a deck, single cards may be held aloft, or be a focus, which would break it from the "natural set" sort of thing. Maybe related to the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/wristband">wristband</a> thing: despite many images having both, having one is established enough to negate the "natural pair".</p><p>Would <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/card_deck" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">card_deck</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/deck_of_cards" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">deck_of_cards</a> be too out-there?</p>NeverGonnaGive/users/65656tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232472009-07-15T20:32:50-04:002009-07-15T20:32:50-04:00@sgcdonmai: Things like Clow cards, pactio cards, and the...<p>Things like Clow cards, pactio cards, and the major arcana of the tarot would fall under the heading of "trumps". Since <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/trump" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">trump</a> is currently unused, you could use that for them, although I don't see a need for it.</p>sgcdonmai/users/21085tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232402009-07-15T17:44:56-04:002009-07-15T17:44:56-04:00@Shinjidude: It's against my typical stance, but I like...<p>It's against my typical stance, but I like plural here too. Perhaps "natural set" is a good extension of the "natural pair" rule?</p>Shinjidude/users/1002tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232392009-07-15T17:29:19-04:002009-07-15T17:29:19-04:00@Log: Yeah I was thinking pretty much the same thing....<p>Yeah I was thinking pretty much the same thing. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/card_face" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">Card_face</a> for things like the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pactio">pactio</a> perhaps?</p>Log/users/9509tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232342009-07-15T14:46:58-04:002009-07-15T14:46:58-04:00@NWF_Renim: Personally I prefer plural. The tag seems to...<p>Personally I prefer plural. The tag seems to indicate generally game cards and such, that typically come from a deck. Any kind of card game cards, playing cards, tarot cards, etc, naturally come in a deck. These aren't like business cards where a single one would be the norm.</p><p>Despite that though, I kind of feel that they shouldn't be merged. One thing of note is that there are images where the whole image is a single <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/card">card</a>, such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pactio">pactio</a> cards (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/31191">post #31191</a>), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/clow_card">clow cards</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/420262">post #420262</a>), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/playing_cards" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">playing cards</a> (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/274552">post #274552</a>), and a variety of game and other cards (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/334446">post #334446</a>). So while I prefer plural, I do think we need a tag at least for these card single images. They're distinctly different from a card object in an image.</p>NWF_Renim/users/13392tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/232322009-07-15T13:40:57-04:002009-07-25T22:30:22-04:00@jxh2154: I'm really not sure why I'm wavering over this...<p>I'm really not sure why I'm wavering over this one, but I am. From <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/14788">forum #14788</a></p><blockquote><p>T5J8F8 said: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/cards" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">cards</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/card">card</a></p></blockquote><p>Is there any reason not to do so? I think the only reason I have not done it already is because both tags have quite a lot of posts and reversing it would be a bitch.</p><p>Thoughts?</p>jxh2154/users/1309