tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/2465 Should we tag those fox-like eyes? 2009-07-19T23:58:19-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23436 2009-07-19T23:57:38-04:00 2009-07-19T23:58:19-04:00 @DschingisKhan: Defining relies on a bit of a judgment call,... <p>Defining relies on a bit of a judgment call, yes, but I'd say we're no strangers to tags that rely on that to a greater or lesser extent. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/happy">happy</a> has over two-thousand posts. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/long_hair">long_hair</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/breasts">breasts</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/short_hair">short_hair</a> are first, second, and fifth most common out of all tags respectively (each with well over 50,000 posts), and they each require a certain amount of discretion, too. Hell, there's even been debate on <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/japanese_clothes">japanese_clothes</a> that I can recall.</p><p>I'm not trying to twist any arms on this, but I thought I'd at least point that out. My own standpoint is that there are cases where you can just sort of..."tell." And in cases where you don't know, you have the community to back you up so it's okay.</p> DschingisKhan /users/60134 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23401 2009-07-18T18:52:38-04:00 2009-07-18T18:52:38-04:00 @Tieria: > jxh2154 said: > I wish we could see the tag... <blockquote><p>jxh2154 said:<br>I wish we could see the tag history of an individual tag.</p></blockquote><p>I'm not even a mod/janitor and I've been wondering why mods (at least) can't do so, if not the rest of us. It's been driving me crazy.</p> Tieria /users/99285 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23400 2009-07-18T18:28:37-04:00 2009-07-18T18:28:37-04:00 @jxh2154: > Shinjidude said: I would probably lean... <blockquote><p>Shinjidude said: I would probably lean towards keeping them separate. Obviously despite appearances <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/kitsune_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">kitsune_eyes</a> are not closed, they still see.</p></blockquote><p>True, but I was thinking of closed_eyes just reflecting the visual style, not whether or not the eyes were able to see.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23399 2009-07-18T17:34:53-04:00 2009-07-18T17:34:53-04:00 @Shinjidude: I would probably lean towards keeping them... <p>I would probably lean towards keeping them separate. Obviously despite appearances <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/kitsune_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">kitsune_eyes</a> are not closed, they still see.</p> Shinjidude /users/1002 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23398 2009-07-18T17:01:48-04:00 2009-07-18T17:04:14-04:00 @jxh2154: > スラッシュ said: Well I never thought that... <blockquote><p>スラッシュ said: Well I never thought that contextual tags are a bad thing inherently. Stuff like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/alternate_costume">alternate_costume</a> and even <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/young" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">young</a> don't work without context, and we accept "word of God" for drawings, so I really think a tag like this is perfectly sensible.</p></blockquote><p>I support contextual tags too, it's just that in this case it needs to be defined a bit more clearly. Basically context can guide it, but the visuals on the individual image of course still need to be there. So I wouldn't want it applied on images where the eyes are closed but aren't really drawn in the style, even if the character is known for being like that in canon. And likewise it'd be applied to characters who are drawn like that even if in canon they don't look like it.</p><p>But I'm stating the obvious now I guess. </p><p>Anyway, yes, we can start using this tag, though the next question is whether it implicates eyes_closed or if some kitsune_eyes images can have the eyes ever so slightly open.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23393 2009-07-18T16:02:01-04:00 2009-07-18T16:02:01-04:00 @スラッシュ: Well I never thought that contextual tags are a... <p>Well I never thought that contextual tags are a bad thing inherently. Stuff like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/alternate_costume">alternate_costume</a> and even <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/young" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">young</a> don't work without context, and we accept "word of God" for drawings, so I really think a tag like this is perfectly sensible.</p> スラッシュ /users/12866 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23392 2009-07-18T15:57:10-04:00 2009-07-18T15:57:10-04:00 @jxh2154: I wish we could see the tag history of an... <p>I wish we could see the tag history of an individual tag.</p><p>Anyway, if people are okay with tagging something that relies a bit more on non-image context than usual, I agree it's worthwhile. I suppose it wouldn't even need to rely too much on outside context, if we only apply it where it's really obvious, like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/396651">post #396651</a>. Not sure if I'd apply it to <em>every</em> single closed_eyes image of a character known to usually show the style though...</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23386 2009-07-18T15:29:27-04:00 2009-07-18T15:33:45-04:00 @スラッシュ: Yeah, what happened to that kitsune_eyes tag?... <p>Yeah, what happened to that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/kitsune_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">kitsune_eyes</a> tag? God, it's like tags are just evaporating on people's whims or something.</p><p>Anyway, I think that tag has obvious merit. It's clearly a fairly common Japanese character design trope, and as such deserves a tag.</p> スラッシュ /users/12866 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23356 2009-07-18T07:29:15-04:00 2009-07-18T07:29:34-04:00 @Shinjidude: I think kitsune_eyes was at one point used for... <p>I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/kitsune_eyes" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">kitsune_eyes</a> was at one point used for this, though I'm not sure what happened to it. Example characters would include <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/konno_mitsune">konno_mitsune</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/ichimaru_gin">ichimaru_gin</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/takeshi_%28pokemon%29">takeshi_(pokemon)</a>. </p><p>These characters are drawn with their eyes seemingly closed or open only a tiny bit almost all the time. They obviously don't have trouble seeing however.</p> Shinjidude /users/1002 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23341 2009-07-18T02:46:08-04:00 2009-07-18T02:46:30-04:00 @jxh2154: Plenty of characters do this, the problem is... <p>Plenty of characters do this, the problem is that I'm not sure how the difference would be conveyed in a still image for a viewer who has no prior knowledge of the character's traits.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23339 2009-07-18T01:29:40-04:00 2009-07-18T01:29:40-04:00 @juunigatsu_no_usagi: Examples? There would have to be a clear... <p>Examples?</p><p>There would have to be a clear difference between someone just closing their eyes (or smiling with their eyes closed). And someone who has closed eyes out of characteristics.</p> juunigatsu_no_usagi /users/15149 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/23338 2009-07-18T00:47:36-04:00 2009-07-19T23:57:38-04:00 @DschingisKhan: That is,「狐の目」; Eyes that "look like little... <p>That is,「狐の目」; Eyes that "look like little slits but they're always like that and the person can still see fine."</p><p>It seems that it's just getting put as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/eyes_closed" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">eyes_closed</a> currently, but are we cool with that? It's not <em>super</em> important, but it came to mind so I thought I'd bring it up.</p><p>A quick search turns up a thread in which this was mentioned from almost a year ago, but apparently nothing ever came of it.</p> DschingisKhan /users/60134