tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/2727Apologies in advance for Tag Discussion: MILF2016-11-20T16:23:09-05:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1396682017-11-23T07:41:53-05:002017-11-23T08:24:20-05:00@steflee: Here you can find sexy milfs and matures!...<p>Here you can find sexy milfs and matures! <a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link" href="http://bestmilfsites.com/">http://bestmilfsites.com/</a></p>steflee/users/529859tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1228932016-11-20T16:23:09-05:002016-11-20T16:23:09-05:00@Hillside_Moose: Yes, especially in Animeland where there's...<p>Yes, especially in Animeland where there's 60-year-old lolis and 25-year-old men with grey beards.</p><p>I've mass-edited out <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mature">mature</a> from the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/lusamine_%28pokemon%29">lusamine_(pokemon)</a> tag.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1228642016-11-20T06:44:32-05:002016-11-20T06:44:32-05:00@Astolfo: Bumping this thread for a question.
I noticed...<p>Bumping this thread for a question. <br>I noticed a series of recent changes added the mature tag to a vast quantity of lusamine_(pokemon) posts which more or less flooded the tag. I was under the impression that Danbooru tagging was "tag what you see, not what you know" logic, thus making the tag apply for characters that are visibly mature women - and Lusamine is anything but mature-looking, despite being stated to be 40 or something like that.</p><p>Should these be reverted?</p>Astolfo/users/385582tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174642016-07-22T13:00:27-04:002016-07-22T13:00:27-04:00@user_201502: > Hillside_Moose said:
>
> create alias milf...<blockquote>
<p>Hillside_Moose said:</p>
<p>create alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/milf" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">milf</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mature">mature</a></p>
<p><a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=824">Link to request</a></p>
</blockquote><p>Thanks.</p>user_201502/users/201502tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174532016-07-22T05:26:50-04:002016-07-22T05:26:50-04:00@user_460797: Well, ok.
Then I would leave these tags...<p>Well, ok.<br>Then I would leave these tags untouched and create no relationship between them and only go with the approved alias. </p>user_460797/users/460797tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174522016-07-22T05:20:55-04:002016-07-22T05:20:55-04:00@Hillside_Moose: > Provence said:
>
> But what is then the...<blockquote>
<p>Provence said:</p>
<p>But what is then the difference to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/older">older</a>? It seems that old (elder) is a specific of older (which can be 20 years or 80 years older).</p>
</blockquote><p>Pretty much. It's a refinement of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/older">older</a>, much like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/teenage">teenage</a> is a refinement of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/older">older</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/younger">younger</a> depending on the character's current age.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174512016-07-22T05:18:59-04:002016-07-22T05:26:27-04:00@chilled_sake: > Provence said:
>
> But what is then the...<blockquote>
<p>Provence said:</p>
<p>But what is then the difference to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/older">older</a>? It seems that old (elder) is a specific of older (which can be 20 years or 80 years older).</p>
</blockquote><p>I take it old should be aliased to older.</p><p>edit: nevermind that</p>chilled_sake/users/463832tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174502016-07-22T05:16:18-04:002016-07-22T05:16:18-04:00@Hillside_Moose: The bulk update request #824 has been approved.<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=824">bulk update request #824</a> has been approved.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174492016-07-22T05:15:52-04:002016-07-22T05:15:52-04:00@user_460797: > Hillside_Moose said:
>
> That's not what the...<blockquote>
<p>Hillside_Moose said:</p>
<p>That's not what the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a> tag is for. Read the wiki.</p>
</blockquote><p>But what is then the difference to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/older">older</a>? It seems that old (elder) is a specific of older (which can be 20 years or 80 years older). </p>user_460797/users/460797tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174482016-07-22T05:15:46-04:002016-07-22T05:15:46-04:00@Hillside_Moose: create alias milf -> mature
Link to request<p>create alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/milf" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">milf</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mature">mature</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=824">Link to request</a></p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174472016-07-22T05:11:00-04:002016-07-22T05:11:00-04:00@Hillside_Moose: That's not what the old tag is for. Read the...<p>That's not what the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a> tag is for. Read the wiki.</p><p>I'm going to alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/milf" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">milf</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mature">mature</a> just to get it over with. Implicating doesn't solve the problem, and a MILF pool would only turn into a cesspool due to wildly different standards.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174372016-07-22T01:45:21-04:002016-07-22T01:45:21-04:00@user_460797: > tapnek said:
>
> Old people are beyond what...<blockquote>
<p>tapnek said:</p>
<p>Old people are beyond what is considered mature. They're <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a>. I don't know if you want to alias those tags to that or have them imply that though.</p>
</blockquote><p>Well, if we have an <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a> tag, I don't see a reason to not imply that. Alias would be inappropriate I think since old woman/man are two different thing. To alias them to the same <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a> tag...nope, wouldn't want that. </p>user_460797/users/460797tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174362016-07-22T01:39:55-04:002016-07-22T01:39:55-04:00@tapnek: Old people are beyond what is considered...<p>Old people are beyond what is considered mature. They're <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old">old</a>. I don't know if you want to alias those tags to that or have them imply that though.</p>tapnek/users/454016tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174352016-07-22T01:35:12-04:002016-07-22T01:35:12-04:00@user_460797: Well.
We have old_woman and old_man for...uhm...<p>Well.<br>We have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old_woman">old_woman</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/old_man">old_man</a> for...uhm "Gilf" I guess. <br>But first: Should old woman and old man imply or be aliased to mature?</p>user_460797/users/460797tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174312016-07-21T19:30:59-04:002016-07-21T19:30:59-04:00@Kikimaru: > Unbreakable said:
>
> Gilf is granny yes, no...<blockquote>
<p>Unbreakable said:</p>
<p>Gilf is granny yes, no clue what Dilf is since I've never heard of it.</p>
</blockquote><p>dilf = Dad</p><p><strong>DON'T ASK ME HOW I KNOW THESE</strong></p>Kikimaru/users/11314tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174252016-07-21T09:16:58-04:002016-07-21T09:16:58-04:00@Unbreakable: > chodorov said:
>
> Dilf and gilf render no...<blockquote>
<p>chodorov said:</p>
<p>Dilf and gilf render no searches for me and they don't show up in recent searches. Why alias something not being used?</p>
<p>Also what do these acronyms mean, is gilf supposed to mean grandmother?</p>
</blockquote><p>Gilf is granny yes, no clue what Dilf is since I've never heard of it.</p>Unbreakable/users/430030tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174212016-07-21T05:54:33-04:002016-07-21T05:54:33-04:00@chilled_sake: > Kikimaru said:
>
> I would favour implying...<blockquote>
<p>Kikimaru said:</p>
<p>I would favour implying milf -> mature, and aliasing less common tags (dilf, gilf etc.)</p>
</blockquote><p>Dilf and gilf render no searches for me and they don't show up in recent searches. Why alias something not being used?</p><p>Also what do these acronyms mean, is gilf supposed to mean grandmother?</p>chilled_sake/users/463832tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174202016-07-21T05:48:18-04:002016-07-21T05:48:45-04:00@Kikimaru: > Provence said:
>
> Good idea. I would do it...<blockquote>
<p>Provence said:</p>
<p>Good idea. I would do it this way.<br>But for the tagging: Would it be sufficient to mass update milf to mature then?</p>
</blockquote><p>I would favour implying milf -> mature, and aliasing less common tags (dilf, gilf etc.)</p>Kikimaru/users/11314tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174012016-07-20T05:23:54-04:002016-07-20T05:23:54-04:00@user_460797: > buehbueh said:
>
> There's no argument that...<blockquote>
<p>buehbueh said:</p>
<p>There's no argument that milf is subjective. However, it's not something that actively interrupts the searches done on the website, the tag milf by itself is being used otherwise correctly for the one thing it describes, even if it goes against all the rules of form. It's existence, as obnoxious as it is, works just fine.</p>
<p>Thus, leaving it as it is lets the function of searching for those items continue unhindered. But beyond that, replacing milf with mature and having milf redirect to that is just good practice and sets the problem down for good.</p>
<p>Removing milf without a suitable replacement will cause problems for searches of those images in the future, getting in the way of making those images with the tag as it is, no longer directly searchable. Even if mature has negative connotations, which I agree make it a kind of loaded term, it is form and function-wise a superior option, and looks like it has earned the majority of support from past users.</p>
<p>That all being said, since Apollyon and NWF Renim suggested a pool instead, I'd say "MILFS" or "MILFS Only" is an OK name, and give it the agreed criteria: "Older women that can be considered attractive or who've retained their beauty, a woman doesn't have to be a mother to be considered one. This replaces milf tag."</p>
<p>My personal feeling is also to consider what Schrobby said, that mature is a better tag for general things like cougars and non-milf mature characters, then have the actual milf images be in a pool, probably the most preferable idea all around.</p>
</blockquote><p>Good idea. I would do it this way.<br>But for the tagging: Would it be sufficient to mass update milf to mature then? </p>user_460797/users/460797tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1174002016-07-20T05:21:42-04:002016-07-20T05:21:42-04:00@buehbueh: There's no argument that milf is subjective....<p>There's no argument that milf is subjective. However, it's not something that actively interrupts the searches done on the website, the tag milf by itself is being used otherwise correctly for the one thing it describes, even if it goes against all the rules of form. It's existence, as obnoxious as it is, works just fine.</p><p>Thus, leaving it as it is lets the function of searching for those items continue unhindered. But beyond that, replacing milf with mature and having milf redirect to that is just good practice and sets the problem down for good.</p><p>Removing milf without a suitable replacement will cause problems for searches of those images in the future, getting in the way of making those images with the tag as it is, no longer directly searchable. Even if mature has negative connotations, which I agree make it a kind of loaded term, it is form and function-wise a superior option, and looks like it has earned the majority of support from past users.</p><p>That all being said, since Apollyon and NWF Renim suggested a pool instead, I'd say "MILFS" or "MILFS Only" is an OK name, and give it the agreed criteria: "Older women that can be considered attractive or who've retained their beauty, a woman doesn't have to be a mother to be considered one. This replaces milf tag."</p><p>My personal feeling is also to consider what Schrobby said, that mature is a better tag for general things like cougars and non-milf mature characters, then have the actual milf images be in a pool, probably the most preferable idea all around.</p>buehbueh/users/192105