Unless another kabuto artist exists that we know of we could use kabuto_(artist), otherwise kabuto_(kabutosan631) would work from his/her pixiv username, or we could even use use the username: kabutosan631 or some varient thereof.
Posted under General
Unless another kabuto artist exists that we know of we could use kabuto_(artist), otherwise kabuto_(kabutosan631) would work from his/her pixiv username, or we could even use use the username: kabutosan631 or some varient thereof.
Qualify the helm, and rename the artist to kabuto-san?
I wouldn't say we should qualify the general object. The artist isn't highly entrenched, and general items trump artists anyway. I'd just give the helm the base tag.
There's a kabuto_(helmet) tag already... through it only has one post.
Shinjidude said:
I wouldn't say we should qualify the general object. The artist isn't highly entrenched, and general items trump artists anyway. I'd just give the helm the base tag.
Neither is highly entrenched. The qualifier should stick, to disambiguate the two uncommon tags.
I guess I'm asking why qualify what doesn't need qualified. The artist has only 2 undeleted posts. I don't see how that is sufficient enough to require we qualify a noun.
I definitely think the helmet should get priority over the artist. I guess just kabutosan631 is good, as there's a high chance we'll get another artist called "kabuto" at some point in the future.
Made kabuto general, moved the one kabuto_(helmet) tag into it, added a simple wiki, and moved the artist to kabutosan631. The one deleted image was of the pokemon, which we already have a kabuto_(pokemon) tag for.