Tag: Sweets?

@jxh2154: Yes leave things as they are.

2011-04-01T21:21:57-04:00

Yes leave things as they are.

@Shinjidude: I would argue that the tag currently is being...

2011-03-29T07:07:07-04:00

I would argue that the tag currently is being used by its US definition:

from Dictionary.com :
22. sweets, pie, cake, candy, and other foods high in sugar content

Junk_food is fine, but that is a somewhat different semantic group. Potato chips, and fast-food hamburgers for example are members of junk food, but not sweets.

My vote would be to leave things as they are.

@Zekana: if we are gonna group those tags together, id...

2011-03-28T22:14:59-04:00

if we are gonna group those tags together, id rather have the tag junk_food. junkfood feels much more broad of a tag, allowing for things that aren't sweet or sugary to be grouped together, like potatoe chips and sour foods and such.

But sweets sounds good aswell.

@juunigatsu_no_usagi: boop

2011-03-28T21:17:12-04:00

boop

@juunigatsu_no_usagi: sweets At first I was unsure what it was used...

2011-03-21T22:23:28-04:00

sweets

At first I was unsure what it was used for, as I was thinking of the US term, so I made the wiki based on the images. Is the tag to be used as a catch all for high sugar foods? Or can it just be dumped and the candy, pastry, and snacks tag cover it?