tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/5860 Tag Alias: virgin -> bleeding_from_pussy 2020-03-25T21:11:25-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164423 2020-03-25T21:11:25-04:00 2020-03-25T21:11:25-04:00 @nonamethanks: [bur:2396] Reason: > Hillside_Moose said: > ... <p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests/2396">bulk update request #2396</a> is pending approval.</p><p>remove alias <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a><br>mass update <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=virgin">virgin</a> -&gt; defloration<br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hymen">hymen</a> -&gt; <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a></p><p>Reason: </p><blockquote> <p>Hillside_Moose said:</p> <p>But I get it, you want a tag covering virginity as a concept. We could use a new tag like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/virginity" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">virginity</a> for such situations, instead of putting it in a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> pile and relying on several negation searches.</p> </blockquote><p>This doesn't answer the question of what to do with the 120 or so posts under <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=hymen%20-virgin">hymen -virgin</a>, which still counts as being virgin. There's also who knows how many under <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=hymen%20virgin">hymen virgin</a> that don't have any blood, so go against the current wiki definition of the tag.</p><p>This wouldn't be the first time we unmake 10-years-old implications/aliases anyway, because nobody at the time was thinking of making tags future-proof.</p><p>All the posts currently tagged with the wiki definition of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> could be searched with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> instead, there's no need for negative searches. If anything, an umbrella tag is be better than the current situation.</p><p>(I can't add "imply defloration -&gt; virgin" to the request due to site limitations, I'll create a new one for it if this is approved).</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164370 2020-03-24T23:19:02-04:00 2020-03-24T23:19:02-04:00 @Hillside_Moose: > nonamethanks said: > > It's not just one... <blockquote> <p>nonamethanks said:</p> <p>It's not just one picture.<br>Another bunch just from a quick search:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/114719">post #114719</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3830404">post #3830404</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3830380">post #3830380</a></p> <p>It's hard to find more because there's no tag for it.<br>Anyway, to not affect the current tag I've created <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/implied_virgin" title="This wiki page does not exist">implied virgin</a> for them.</p> </blockquote><p>Again, more text. The last post is just a tent, where's the "virgin" in that one? If you suggest tagging the parent post with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a>, you went from borderline meta to full meta.</p><p>But I get it, you want a tag covering virginity as a concept. We could use a new tag like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/virginity" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">virginity</a> for such situations, instead of putting it in a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> pile and relying on several negation searches.</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164331 2020-03-24T08:57:09-04:00 2020-03-24T08:57:09-04:00 @nonamethanks: > Mysterious_Uploader said: > > I think... <blockquote> <p>Mysterious_Uploader said:</p> <p>I think changing the current meaning to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a>, like suggested before, and implying something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hymen">hymen</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> could be useful.</p> </blockquote><p>Yeah there's another hundred or so posts under <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=hymen%20-virgin">hymen -virgin</a> too.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164329 2020-03-24T08:49:12-04:00 2020-03-24T08:49:12-04:00 @Mysterious_Uploader: > Hillside_Moose said: > > This thread's... <blockquote> <p>Hillside_Moose said:</p> <p>This thread's almost nine years old. The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> tag has a lot of baggage you're asking everyone to overcome for the sake of one meme pic (that, without the text, border on meta).</p> </blockquote><p>I think changing the current meaning to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a>, like suggested before, and implying something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hymen">hymen</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> could be useful.</p> Mysterious_Uploader /users/565998 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164328 2020-03-24T08:44:59-04:00 2020-03-24T08:44:59-04:00 @nonamethanks: > Hillside_Moose said: > > This thread's... <blockquote> <p>Hillside_Moose said:</p> <p>This thread's almost nine years old. The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> tag has a lot of baggage you're asking everyone to overcome for the sake of one meme pic (that, without the text, border on meta).</p> </blockquote><p>It's not just one picture.<br>Another bunch just from a quick search:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/114719">post #114719</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3830404">post #3830404</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3830380">post #3830380</a></p><p>It's hard to find more because there's no tag for it.<br>Anyway, to not affect the current tag I've created <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/implied_virgin" title="This wiki page does not exist">implied virgin</a> for them.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164318 2020-03-24T00:44:53-04:00 2020-03-24T00:44:53-04:00 @Hillside_Moose: This thread's almost nine years old. The virgin... <p>This thread's almost nine years old. The <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> tag has a lot of baggage you're asking everyone to overcome for the sake of one meme pic (that, without the text, border on meta).</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164310 2020-03-23T17:16:55-04:00 2020-03-23T17:16:55-04:00 @nonamethanks: > worldendDominator said: > > I have wondered... <blockquote> <p>worldendDominator said:</p> <p>I have wondered once why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> isn't called <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> instead considering its "official" use. That would also leave <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> free for uses such as nonamethanks linked above, if neccessary.</p> </blockquote><p>What about removing the current alias, and then implicating defloration to virgin? That way <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=virgin%20-defloration">virgin -defloration</a> would cover the cases without actual defloration.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164309 2020-03-23T17:10:02-04:00 2020-03-23T17:10:02-04:00 @worldendDominator: I have wondered once why virgin isn't called... <p>I have wondered once why <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> isn't called <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/defloration" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">defloration</a> instead considering its "official" use. That would also leave <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> free for uses such as nonamethanks linked above, if neccessary.</p> worldendDominator /users/406536 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164286 2020-03-23T01:37:19-04:00 2020-03-23T01:37:19-04:00 @heartattack: Pictures involving an intact hymen (nsfw... <p>Pictures involving an intact <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/hymen">hymen</a> (nsfw obviously) are often tagged virgin but usually don't have blood.</p> heartattack /users/612007 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/164253 2020-03-22T12:37:50-04:00 2020-03-22T12:37:50-04:00 @nonamethanks: Resurrecting this topic from the grave. Should... <p>Resurrecting this topic from the grave. Should <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/3830228">post #3830228</a> and similar be tagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> when it's made clear the character is a virgin? I'm asking this because the wiki states it only applies to defloration but I haven't found any other tag to express the same concept. </p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61271 2011-04-23T14:43:25-04:00 2011-04-23T14:43:25-04:00 @jxh2154: The instances of vaginal bleeding that aren't... <p>The instances of vaginal bleeding that <em>aren't</em> intended to be related to sex are few, so you wont get much tag pollution if for some reason you want to search for images depicting this.</p><p>So I agree with NWF to just have vaginal_bleeding be for any type of bleeding. Then menstruation can be added as necessary where it fits the subset of bleeding.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61199 2011-04-21T13:45:45-04:00 2011-04-21T13:45:45-04:00 @NWF_Renim: Thinking about this a bit more. If you guys... <p>Thinking about this a bit more. If you guys are going to try and make such a change, why not simply go all the way and allow your <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal_bleeding" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">vaginal_bleeding</a> tag to cover all forms of vaginal bleeding, including nonsexual bleeding. There would be no need in excluding nonsexual images, since you could simply do a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=vaginal_bleeding%20sex">vaginal_bleeding sex</a> search just for vaginal bleeding with sex. </p><p>Additionally, then the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> tag could be changed to be when the image has some sort of indicator (symbols, text, etc) that the character is a virgin and be used to also cover nonsexual images as well.</p><p>In short, I'd support either going nowhere or going further than what is proposed.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61198 2011-04-21T13:45:37-04:00 2011-04-21T13:46:27-04:00 @feline_lump: Again, I think if virgin is allowed to stay, it... <p>Again, I think if <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> is allowed to stay, it will become redundant. There are very few situations where it would apply that would not also be covered by the new term, and it's not like there is a large range of people who want to see people bleeding while penetrated only if they say they are virgins. If we don't tag those examples, then you just have people mentioning that they are virgins and other such things. That would be like tagging a picture with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/doctor">doctor</a> if a character mentions that they are a doctor while not on the job.</p><p>As for the argument that there are very few cases where they are not actually virgins: You can't assume that every artist thinks that way. For example, there is <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-pool-id-link" href="/pools/3253">pool #3253</a>. In it, Sakuya is penetrated a total of four times, but only bleeds three times. In those three times, it is also clear that the penetration is rough and forceful. Yet, it is tagged as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> both times even though at least one case is blatantly incorrect.</p><p>If you want a less ambiguous name, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/bleeding_while_penetrated" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bleeding while penetrated</a> could work.</p> feline_lump /users/343288 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61197 2011-04-21T13:32:42-04:00 2011-04-21T13:32:42-04:00 @sgcdonmai: The fact is, nearly 100% of all cases in... <p>The fact is, nearly 100% of all cases in Japanese art where blood is exiting the vagina, it's because of a torn hymen. Never mind conflicts with reality; as far as Japanese erotic art is concerned, vaginal blood = defloration.</p><p>The very few cases where this is not so would fall squarely in the realm of guro, and to the best of my understanding, tagging it that way on Danbooru would solve the problem.</p> sgcdonmai /users/21085 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61196 2011-04-21T13:18:13-04:00 2011-04-21T13:19:32-04:00 @NWF_Renim: One, there is the information there that can... <p>One, there is the information there that can explicitly indicate the character is a virgin. Ignoring such information means losing that information, particularly information that people will actually search for. It's not useless information, and it does carry meaning for the image.</p><p>Two, the new term's name is ambiguous. You argue now for a stricter definition and you can write all you want in the wiki, but as time goes on what will matter most is the name of the tag. People will inevitably start adding other images, particularly <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/menstruation">menstruation</a> to this new tag. People will start expanding and changing the definition of the tag because of how broad its name is. Thinking it won't happen is rather silly. Having this as an implication and thus a subcategory already in place before it happens will save time and a headache in the future.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61195 2011-04-21T13:07:55-04:00 2011-04-21T13:09:59-04:00 @スラッシュ: How do you show someone being a virgin? By... <p>How do you show someone being a virgin? By saying it in the text? Having a little picture of a cherry next to their head? I'm not to sure if that's really a valuable tag to have. And since <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> as a tag has meant "vaginal bleeding in a sexual situation" on this site for so long, I think the alias makes the most sense. That way, virgin acts as a shortcut, sort of.</p> スラッシュ /users/12866 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61194 2011-04-21T13:07:45-04:00 2011-04-21T13:07:45-04:00 @NWF_Renim: > feline_lump said: > I'm not too sure whether... <blockquote><p>feline_lump said:<br>I'm not too sure whether <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> being used for characters that are shown to be virgins is a good idea. I can't think of any posts that could apply that aren't covered by <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/bleeding_from_pussy" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bleeding from pussy</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal_bleeding" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">vaginal bleeding</a>.</p></blockquote><p>There are people who would explicitly look for images in which it is indicated that the character is a virgin. There can be a plenty of indicators (text in the image, pixiv tags, artist comments, etc) that would indicate whether the character was a virgin or not. At minimum, because such stuff does exist, you'll never get an alias, but at best an implication.</p><p>Frankly I think you're over thinking the weight of alternative forms of vaginal bleeding, as well as underestimating the use of vaginal bleeding to deliberately indicate the character is a virgin in hentai. In hentai, the number one source for vaginal blood is going to be due to defloration, all other alternatives are going to be in the extreme minority.</p><p>Can you provide examples in which it isn't ambiguous, but clearly vaginal bleeding that isn't due to defloration?</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61191 2011-04-21T11:47:10-04:00 2011-04-21T11:47:10-04:00 @feline_lump: The reason I picked bleeding from pussy is for... <p>The reason I picked <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/bleeding_from_pussy" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bleeding from pussy</a> is for consistency with the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/pussy">pussy</a> tag, but if that's not required, then I like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal_bleeding" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">vaginal bleeding</a> better.</p><p>I also think it should be separate from <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/menstruation">menstruation</a>, because <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> is currently being used for pictures where a female is bleeding in a sexual situation. If someone wanted to search for women on their period, they would have to go through a lot of irrelevant results.</p><p>I'm not too sure whether <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/virgin">virgin</a> being used for characters that are shown to be virgins is a good idea. I can't think of any posts that could apply that aren't covered by <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/bleeding_from_pussy" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">bleeding from pussy</a>/<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/vaginal_bleeding" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">vaginal bleeding</a>.</p> feline_lump /users/343288 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61188 2011-04-21T11:34:02-04:00 2011-04-21T11:34:02-04:00 @Saladofstones: I think virgin can be used if the image makes... <p>I think virgin can be used if the image makes it clear that she is a virgin.</p><p>I'm not sure if its something people really search for when they want porn, though.</p> Saladofstones /users/318380 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/61187 2011-04-21T11:19:04-04:00 2011-04-21T11:24:26-04:00 @Zekana: if this is changed, i think vaginal_bleeding... <p>if this is changed, i think <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=vaginal_bleeding">vaginal_bleeding</a> may sound a little better in practice.<br>just be for all kinds of situations when blood is coming from the vagina, like said with <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=Menstruation">Menstruation</a>, as well as hymen breaking or someone actually cutting the inside of the vagina.</p> Zekana /users/322635