I notice that "endcards" are tagged as eyecatch, and even though the general tags (endcard and alternatively end_card) have been created before, they must have been removed since they are no longer in use. Are we just going to count an endcard as an "eyecatch" (in which case, aliases are needed) or do we make a distinction?

I'd say it's still an eyecatch, it tells you that the episode is over rather than leaving for/returning from a commercial but it's still an eyecatch.

If we're going to be using the same tag, which I think I'm OK with, the following aliases should be put in place (the first one regardless):

eye_catch -> eyecatch
endcard -> eyecatch
end_card -> eyecatch

EB said: eye_catch -> eyecatch
endcard -> eyecatch
end_card -> eyecatch

Done.

remove alias endcard -> eyecatch
remove alias end_card -> eyecatch
create alias endcard -> end_card

reason: forum #95358

wiki update to follow

ghostrigger said:

remove alias endcard -> eyecatch
remove alias end_card -> eyecatch
create alias endcard -> end_card

reason: forum #95358

wiki update to follow

I don't feel strongly either way, but is there a significant benefit to separating?

I think it was my comment from that thread (forum #95355) on how an "end card," at least from what I've seen, is a "guest artist of the week" while an "eyecatch" is done by the same people doing the animation.

Alright well I did
remove alias endcard -> eyecatch
remove alias end_card -> eyecatch
create alias endcard -> end_card

But someone will need to clean up eyecatch now.

updated the wikis and referenced this thread. i added some posts to end_card based on memory (and some clues?). i'll leave some unfamiliar eyecatch untouched. hopefully somebody would check on it. thanks.