tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/6571Tag Implication: criss-cross_halter -> halter_top 2017-03-30T21:52:59-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1290362017-03-30T21:52:59-04:002017-03-30T21:52:59-04:00@NWF_Renim: The bulk update request #1144 has been approved.<p>The <a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1144">bulk update request #1144</a> has been approved.</p>NWF_Renim/users/13392tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1289792017-03-29T14:14:09-04:002017-03-29T14:14:09-04:00@Mikaeri: +1 to slime's request<p>+1 to slime's request</p>Mikaeri/users/470449tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1289782017-03-29T14:00:58-04:002017-03-29T14:00:58-04:00@EB: > iridescent_slime said:
>
> Should implicate...<blockquote>
<p>iridescent_slime said:</p>
<p>Should implicate the broader tag instead. This particular style isn't limited to tops, and the current implication means that a lot of dresses are incorrectly tagged <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halter_top">halter top</a>. Examples: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2491194">post #2491194</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2580223">post #2580223</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2671033">post #2671033</a>.</p>
</blockquote><p>Yeah, that way makes more sense to me too.</p>EB/users/11672tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1289772017-03-29T12:23:11-04:002017-03-29T12:23:11-04:00@iridescent_slime: remove implication criss-cross_halter ->...<p>remove implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/criss-cross_halter">criss-cross_halter</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halter_top">halter_top</a><br>create implication <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/criss-cross_halter">criss-cross_halter</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halterneck">halterneck</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link" href="/bulk_update_requests?search%5Bid%5D=1144">Link to request</a></p><p>Should implicate the broader tag instead. This particular style isn't limited to tops, and the current implication means that a lot of dresses are incorrectly tagged <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halter_top">halter top</a>. Examples: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2491194">post #2491194</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2580223">post #2580223</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/2671033">post #2671033</a>.</p>iridescent_slime/users/438068tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/645922011-07-21T16:01:56-04:002011-07-21T16:01:56-04:00@jxh2154: Done<p>Done</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/645882011-07-21T15:43:30-04:002011-07-21T16:01:56-04:00@hungkok2007: Implicating criss-cross_halter -> halter_top.
...<p>Implicating <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/criss-cross_halter">criss-cross_halter</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halter_top">halter_top</a>.</p><p>Or implicate to halter_neck. Whatever.</p><p>Reason: Self-evident.</p>hungkok2007/users/95625