tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/6865About the pool "GARthering"2011-10-30T21:41:06-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/684522011-10-30T21:41:06-04:002011-10-30T21:41:06-04:00@Lunatic6: > Black_Gold_Saw said:
> But girls can be GAR...<blockquote>
<p>Black_Gold_Saw said:<br>But girls can be GAR as well. </p>
<p>GARgirls... </p>
</blockquote><p>Don't worry I understand about this thing, females with male dominant traits or females with manly achievements that they have achieve in canon (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/903293">post #903293</a>) can qualify in this pool.</p>Lunatic6/users/321535tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/684492011-10-30T20:39:10-04:002011-10-30T20:39:10-04:00@Lunatic6: Well as jxh's orders, GARthering will be males....<p>Well as jxh's orders, GARthering will be males. </p><p>But don't worry, I won't touch the first eight posts that mentioned because I can see manliness is still dominates those posts, I'm not sure about <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/953489">post #953489</a> though.</p><p>Also, I have a last question, does Mecha can qualify to this pool as well, I mean <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/946451">post #946451</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/997841">post #997841</a> are surely all mecha.</p><p>I'm also preventing this GARthering = Manly + Everyone or Crossover to happen.</p>Lunatic6/users/321535tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/684322011-10-30T15:29:15-04:002011-10-30T15:29:15-04:00@Black_Gold_Saw: > jxh2154 said:
> Keep GARthering for males....<blockquote><p>jxh2154 said:<br>Keep GARthering for males. Don't we have a couple other pools for characters just generally being badass though?</p></blockquote><p>But girls can be GAR as well. </p><p>GARgirls... </p>Black_Gold_Saw/users/341565tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/684242011-10-30T14:52:36-04:002011-10-30T14:52:36-04:00@jxh2154: Keep GARthering for males. Don't we have a...<p>Keep GARthering for males. Don't we have a couple other pools for characters just generally being badass though?</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/683282011-10-29T03:48:57-04:002011-10-29T08:35:47-04:00@Black_Gold_Saw: > Lunatic6 said:
> But if I won't do something,...<blockquote>
<p>Lunatic6 said:<br>But if I won't do something, pointless arguments about gender, powerlevel discussions or worst could suddenly appear out of nowhere... I'm not trying to be sexist but I'm rather playing it safe.</p>
<p>And beside I think in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/953489">post #953489</a> someone I think is already raging.</p>
</blockquote><p>I took a look at it, but the person looks like they're not raging about the pool. So the pool is still safe!</p><p>But it looks like your comment and mine and others' were downvoted for no clear reason. Mysterious mysterious. (Annoying, it's as if someone is actively downvoting me)</p>Black_Gold_Saw/users/341565tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/683122011-10-28T20:38:12-04:002011-10-28T20:38:12-04:00@Lunatic6: But if I won't do something, pointless...<p>But if I won't do something, pointless arguments about gender, powerlevel discussions or worst could suddenly appear out of nowhere... I'm not trying to be sexist but I'm rather playing it safe.</p><p>And beside I think in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/953489">post #953489</a> someone I think is already raging.</p>Lunatic6/users/321535tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682682011-10-28T10:19:57-04:002011-10-28T10:19:57-04:00@Black_Gold_Saw: > Lunatic6 said:
> Then what are we going to do...<blockquote>
<p>Lunatic6 said:<br>Then what are we going to do with these posts?</p>
<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/39486">post #39486</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/697247">post #697247</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/923374">post #923374</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/921215">post #921215</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/903293">post #903293</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/187654">post #187654</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/900830">post #900830</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/814550">post #814550</a></p>
<p>And especially this one:</p>
<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/953489">post #953489</a></p>
<p>Right, maybe a renaming would do, just to let these posts be included.</p>
<p>I was thinking of "Epic Gatherings" or something but it would be great for any suggestions.</p>
</blockquote><p>It seems to be good as it is. There's no real problem. GARthering has a very nice sound to it as well, so a change in naming would be. . . not good. </p>Black_Gold_Saw/users/341565tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682562011-10-28T08:14:21-04:002011-10-28T08:14:21-04:00@Lunatic6: Then what are we going to do with these posts?
...<p>Then what are we going to do with these posts?</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/39486">post #39486</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/697247">post #697247</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/923374">post #923374</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/921215">post #921215</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/903293">post #903293</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/187654">post #187654</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/900830">post #900830</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/814550">post #814550</a></p><p>And especially this one:</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/953489">post #953489</a></p><p>Right, maybe a renaming would do, just to let these posts be included.</p><p>I was thinking of "Epic Gatherings" or something but it would be great for any suggestions.</p>Lunatic6/users/321535tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682552011-10-28T08:04:06-04:002011-10-28T08:04:06-04:00@Shinjidude: I'd made a second pool. GAR sort of has to be...<p>I'd made a second pool. GAR sort of has to be male by definition it's not entirely synonymous with bad-ass.</p>Shinjidude/users/1002tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682542011-10-28T07:22:59-04:002011-10-28T07:22:59-04:00@Log: You have to change the pool name if you're...<p>You have to change the pool name if you're going to include females. A pool whose name depends on a term that is essentially "really really manly" doesn't make any sense to include females.</p>Log/users/9509tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682512011-10-28T07:02:36-04:002011-10-28T07:02:36-04:00@NeverGonnaGive: "FEMazing", perhaps?<p>"FEMazing", perhaps?</p>NeverGonnaGive/users/65656tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/682422011-10-28T01:23:11-04:002011-10-28T01:23:37-04:00@Lunatic6: Well I was thinking of changing the name...<p>Well I was thinking of changing the name itself, just to let badass female gatherings would be included in the pool without any further questions.</p><p>But yet it seems GARthering fits the pool well so maybe I leave it be... </p>Lunatic6/users/321535tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/681652011-10-27T02:54:34-04:002011-10-27T02:54:34-04:00@Danielx21: I edited the pool as expected. I removed the...<p>I edited the pool as expected. I removed the last four words of the old description:</p><p> "Where the most <strong><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/manly">GAR</a></strong> people gather and do amazing things."</p>Danielx21/users/345814tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/666812011-09-23T22:22:43-04:002011-10-30T21:41:06-04:00@Danielx21: The pool #2194 ("GARthering") contains some...<p>The <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-pool-id-link" href="/pools/2194">pool #2194</a> ("GARthering") contains some images where a bunch of manly men are together, doing amazing things:</p><ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/318348">post #318348</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/436602">post #436602</a></li>
</ul><p>But, in most images there, manly men simply are together, doing nothing:</p><ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/335932">post #335932</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/807090">post #807090</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/920871">post #920871</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/921215">post #921215</a></li>
</ul><p>So, perhaps the description of the pool should be changed, to be more inclusive, to allow all of these images.</p>Danielx21/users/345814