tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/6935I don't get the 'color' tag2019-10-22T13:43:14-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1605152019-10-22T13:43:14-04:002019-10-22T13:44:19-04:00@skylightcrystal: Greyscale implicates monochrome so there's no...<p>Greyscale implicates monochrome so there's no need to remove that one as well.</p><p>(edit: I only posted once...)</p>skylightcrystal/users/557539tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1605142019-10-22T13:42:57-04:002019-10-22T13:42:57-04:00@skylightcrystal: Greyscale implicates monochrome so there's no...<p>Greyscale implicates monochrome so there's no need to remove that one as well.</p>skylightcrystal/users/557539tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1605122019-10-22T11:03:04-04:002019-10-22T11:03:04-04:00@Mysterious_Uploader: > Hyoroemon said:
>
> Okay, but that's really...<blockquote>
<p>Hyoroemon said:</p>
<p>Okay, but that's really convuluted.</p>
</blockquote><p>The alternative is tagging 95% of Danbooru posts as "color".</p>Mysterious_Uploader/users/565998tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1605112019-10-22T10:38:19-04:002019-10-22T10:38:19-04:00@Hyoroemon: Okay, but that's really convuluted.<p>Okay, but that's really convuluted. </p>Hyoroemon/users/377871tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1604852019-10-20T14:28:14-04:002019-10-22T15:08:54-04:00@kittey: > Hyoroemon said:
>
> Can we have tag to...<blockquote>
<p>Hyoroemon said:</p>
<p>Can we have tag to describe a fullcolor image? I'm looking for color tag to find a cover and content.</p>
</blockquote><p>That sure should’ve gone into it’s own topic, not this old one…</p><p>No, we can’t. Try something like <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=-monochrome%20-spot_color%20-partially_colored">-monochrome -spot_color -partially_colored</a>.</p>kittey/users/320377tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1604752019-10-20T03:56:58-04:002019-10-20T03:56:58-04:00@Hyoroemon: Can we have tag to describe a fullcolor image?...<p>Can we have tag to describe a fullcolor image? I'm looking for color tag to find a cover and content.</p>Hyoroemon/users/377871tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726972012-01-19T05:03:58-05:002012-01-19T05:03:58-05:00@BCI_Temp: Well, now that it's been restored, any more...<p>Well, now that it's been restored, any more ideas about how it should be defined?</p>BCI_Temp/users/162262tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726872012-01-18T23:01:36-05:002012-01-18T23:01:36-05:00@Log: Builder is just a title, functionally identical...<p>Builder is just a title, functionally identical to priv, It's possible but not very plausible that albert will ever change this.</p><p>I was saying anyone willing to pay for an upgrade won't do anything to risk demotion and and anyone who's earned an upgrade has made enough edits or uploads without scripting to be trusted. If they're making bad decisions they need to be notified of what they've done wrong but that's about it. Making builder into a special featureset kind of puts a lot of pressure on jxh and albert to keep a constant eye on those users.</p>Log/users/9509tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726862012-01-18T22:43:46-05:002012-01-18T22:44:59-05:00@Hillside_Moose: > Log said:
> Member level users can't tag...<blockquote><p>Log said:<br>Member level users can't tag script. Most users making too quick decisions are builder level or above anyways.</p></blockquote><p>Did Privileged-level users get tag script privileges removed? That's why I specifically worded it as "Builder-level users and below."</p><p>Anyway, this is getting off-topic. Enough from me about it.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726832012-01-18T22:09:04-05:002012-01-18T22:09:39-05:00@Fred1515: > Hillside_Moose said:
> I'm also seriously...<blockquote><p>Hillside_Moose said:<br>I'm also seriously contemplating making a formal request to remove or restrict tag scripts for Builder-level users and below. It would curb the rash of people "helping" at least.</p></blockquote><p>It wouldn't be right to do something like this for every single Builder-level user and below. Those who help should keep their privileges, only those who "help" shouldn't. A few demotions and stricter criteria for promotion to Builder would be enough.</p>Fred1515/users/97403tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726822012-01-18T22:05:48-05:002012-01-18T22:05:48-05:00@Log: Member level users can't tag script. Most users...<p>Member level users can't tag script. Most users making too quick decisions are builder level or above anyways.</p>Log/users/9509tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726792012-01-18T21:31:09-05:002012-01-18T21:31:09-05:00@Hillside_Moose: I've restored the color tag in any case so more...<p>I've restored the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> tag in any case so more than 5 people can take a look at it, especially jxh. I will say it's pretty annoying to go through several pages of tag edits to find the nuked tag in question, restoring it, then going back to restore added tags for manually-edited posts.</p><p>I'm also seriously contemplating making a formal request to remove or restrict tag scripts for Builder-level users and below. It would curb the rash of people "helping" at least.</p>Hillside_Moose/users/85307tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/726622012-01-18T12:15:18-05:002012-01-18T12:15:18-05:00@S1eth: Nuking a tag before you get the OK to do so is...<p>Nuking a tag before you get the OK to do so is always a bad idea, even more so, when there were concepts in there (see SystemXS's post) that are taggable.</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/spot_color">Spot_color</a> does NOT cover posts such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/825246">post #825246</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/934835">post #934835</a>. It is for posts that are nearly entirely monochrome, but have some spots colored for emphasis, usually the eyes.</p>S1eth/users/53985tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/725072012-01-15T14:38:28-05:002012-01-15T14:38:28-05:00@Benit149: Okay, I've removed the color tag from all posts...<p>Okay, I've removed the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> tag from all posts except the deleted ones. Not sure if it's necessary to remove them from deleted posts as well, but it's now considered an ambiguous tag.</p><p>Looks like it was mostly being used for colored 4komas than anything else.</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724262012-01-14T08:37:37-05:002012-01-14T15:03:17-05:00@Benit149: Partially colored looks more rough and...<p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/partially_colored">Partially colored</a> looks more rough and unfinished compared to System's examples.</p><p>I do agree that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> should be marked ambiguous. I'll go through the posts and see what applies while removing the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> tag.</p><p>EDIT: Found the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/spot_color">spot color</a> tag.</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724222012-01-14T07:25:24-05:002012-01-14T07:25:24-05:00@ghostrigger: we also have partially_colored for the...<p>we also have <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/partially_colored">partially_colored</a> for the 'unfinished' coloring.</p><p>so i guess we can move them to more specific tags and mark <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> ambiguous?</p>ghostrigger/users/352944tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724212012-01-14T07:13:38-05:002012-01-14T07:13:38-05:00@Benit149: I can agree with that reasoning.
I tried...<p>I can agree with that reasoning.</p><p>I tried scouring around for similar images and terms, but there really isn't anything that defines this coloring scheme. The best I could do were <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/black_and_white_and_color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black and white and color</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/selective_coloring" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">selective coloring</a>.</p>Benit149/users/248298tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/724202012-01-14T06:45:18-05:002012-01-14T06:45:18-05:00@SystemXS: Throughout the 5 threads made about this, all I...<p>Throughout the 5 threads made about this, all I really see is people equally confused and considering it useless, with the only 2 uses being:</p><ul>
<li>Tagging it with monochrome for "half and half" posts.</li>
<ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/825246">post #825246</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/868362">post #868362</a></li>
</ul>
<li>Tagging posts that are only partially colored (but noticeably more so than <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/spot_color">spot_color</a>)</li>
<ul>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/934835">post #934835</a></li>
<li><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/4680">post #4680</a></li>
</ul>
</ul><p>Both of these uses could be considered sufficiently related, and "color" sounds like a very unspecific tag for them, so I vote it at least gets renamed into something more specific, along with a proper explanation on the wiki.</p><p>Maybe <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/part%28%28ia%29ly%29_color%28ed%29" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">part((ia)ly)_color(ed)</a>, or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/half-color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">half-color</a> (could be confused with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/halftone">halftone</a>), or something.</p>SystemXS/users/65029tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/723992012-01-13T23:05:56-05:002012-01-13T23:05:56-05:00@BCI_Temp: Looked through the images and the linked posts...<p>Looked through the images and the linked posts above, and I don't get it either. There is a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/colored" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">colored</a> tag and a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/colorful">colorful</a> tag, both with clear semantic meanings, but <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/color" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">color</a> just seems to be a random pool.</p><p>I vote to delete tag unless someone can come up with a useful wiki definition for it.</p>BCI_Temp/users/162262tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/723472012-01-13T17:44:05-05:002012-01-13T17:44:05-05:00@Benit149: Fixed.
I browsed through the forums, but it...<p>Fixed.</p><p>I browsed through the forums, but it still doesn't make sense to me. There's artists coloring another's lineart or monochrome images, while there's also artists who normally draw in monochrome suddenly doing color. The definition is still to vague to me.</p>Benit149/users/248298