tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/7317 Deimplicate threesome > sex 2011-12-22T01:22:36-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/70959 2011-12-21T23:45:07-05:00 2011-12-22T01:22:36-05:00 @Danielx21: The current description of sex is this, which... <p>The current description of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> is this, which has been mostly the same since 2008:</p><ul><li>Pictures depicting the act of sexual intercourse. Only use this tag for actual vaginal or anal penetration. Don't use it for oral sex, paizuri, or other acts that don't involve penetration.</li></ul><p>Well, my opinion is:</p><p>1. Don't deimplicate threesome &gt; sex, because it would be pointless. AFAIK, nobody wants to clean up <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> to make sure all posts with nonpenetrative threesomes are removed, much like nobody wants to clean up that big can of worms as a whole.<br>2. One good incentive to make people engage in cleaning up that huge mess would be making final, well-discussed and well understood decisions, such as:</p><ul> <li>...either "Definitely use <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> for penetrative sex only, no exceptions, because of these good reasons: (insert good reasons here)"</li> <li>...or "Expand <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> to all forms of sexual behavior, penetrative or not, because of these good reasons: (insert good reasons here)"</li> <li>...or, alternatively, "Forget about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> completely and let's use different tag names, because of these good reasons: (insert good reasons here)"</li> <li>...which are very different from "Let's try to obey the wiki, at least partially, by removing an implication that conflicts with it."</li> </ul><p>3. The wiki of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> does not represent accurately the meaning of "sex" or the actual use of that tag: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/rape">rape</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mutual_masturbation">mutual masturbation</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/cunnilingus">cunnilingus</a>, etc. are forms of sex, too, whether our tag system acknowledges it or not.</p> Danielx21 /users/345814 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/70917 2011-12-21T09:12:58-05:00 2011-12-21T09:12:58-05:00 @ion288: > Danielx21 said: > Ridiculous, indeed.I do... <blockquote><p>Danielx21 said:<br>Ridiculous, indeed.</p></blockquote><p>I do agree, I suggest we alias/script <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> to intercourse and possibly make a new sex tag with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/cunnilingus">cunnilingus</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/frottage">frottage</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/orgy">orgy</a> etc.. included. But that is a discussion for an other thread. </p> ion288 /users/190759 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/70914 2011-12-21T08:46:13-05:00 2011-12-21T08:46:13-05:00 @Danielx21: > Schrobby said: > So a blowjob or cunnilingus... <blockquote><p>Schrobby said:<br>So a blowjob or cunnilingus is no sex? Ridiculous.</p></blockquote><p>Ridiculous, indeed.</p> Danielx21 /users/345814 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/70913 2011-12-21T08:42:59-05:00 2011-12-21T08:42:59-05:00 @Schrobby: So a blowjob or cunnilingus is no sex? Ridiculous. <p>So a blowjob or cunnilingus is no sex? Ridiculous.</p> Schrobby /users/254161 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/70908 2011-12-21T06:33:05-05:00 2011-12-21T23:45:07-05:00 @ion288: Threesome currently appear to implicate sex... <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/threesome">Threesome</a> currently appear to implicate <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a> which, by our current definition of sex = penetration, should not be.</p><p>Likewise <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/orgy">orgy</a> appear to implicate <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/sex">sex</a>. Also wrong. </p><p>A few examples:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/673744">post #673744</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/60526">post #60526</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/163162">post #163162</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/853911">post #853911</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/484706">post #484706</a></p> ion288 /users/190759