Implications/Aliases: backgrounds

@jxh2154: Did: create alias flower_background ->...

2011-12-30T19:04:34-05:00

Did:
create alias flower_background -> floral_background
create alias star_background -> starry_background
create implication card_background -> card
create implication gradient_background -> gradient
create implication heart_background -> heart
create implication leaf_background -> leaf
create implication polka_dot_background -> polka_dot
create implication starry_background -> star
create implication striped_background -> striped

@Danielx21: bumps

2011-12-29T02:14:57-05:00

*bumps*

@Danielx21: > titaniachkt said: > Also,how would post...

2011-12-17T18:36:52-05:00

titaniachkt said:
Also,how would post #888631 be tagged?
I would use flower for the plant and rose,and flower_(symbol) for the choker and beads

The beads don't seem much symbol-like to me. They're quite realistic in the context of the image.

While we're having this discussion, I took back my request to create the "floral background -> flower" implication.

@titaniachkt: Also,how would post #888631 be tagged? I would...

2011-12-16T00:31:17-05:00

Also,how would post #888631 be tagged?
I would use flower for the plant and rose,and flower_(symbol) for the choker and beads

@titaniachkt: How about: floral_print be used exclusively for...

2011-12-16T00:28:24-05:00

How about:
floral_print be used exclusively for the pattern on clothing
flower_(symbol) be used for both the background and print,and
flower be used for the plant?

Another possibility could be flower_(plant) being used exclusively for the plant,with flower being used as an umbrella term for all 3 types

@Hillside_Moose: I would tag post #341186 flower. I'm also...

2011-12-12T07:43:31-05:00

I would tag post #341186 flower.

I'm also getting second thoughts on this flower_(symbol) tag. floral_print already covers most of the imagery of flowers that aren't the plant, so it's for the symbol already. flower_(symbol) seems like a hyper-specific tag for one post.

@Danielx21: On second thought, what about post #341186? ...

2011-12-12T04:09:00-05:00

On second thought, what about post #341186?

These flowers are simplistic — much like the flower-symbols of post #1049037 — but they are in the ground, as part of the scene, as actual flowers instead of symbols to decorate objects or backgrounds.

@Danielx21: > Hillside_Moose said: > flower has been used...

2011-12-09T01:06:25-05:00

Hillside_Moose said:
flower has been used for actual flowers for a hell of a long time, not to mention the loads of implications linked to it. Symbolic flowers should get their own tag.

Absolutely true. I say:

-1 for flower_(plant)
+1 for flower_(symbol)

@feldt: +1 for making flower_(symbol) a new tag and for...

2011-12-08T23:39:12-05:00

+1 for making flower_(symbol) a new tag and for keeping flower for real flowers.

@Hillside_Moose: flower has been used for actual flowers for a...

2011-12-08T23:13:10-05:00

flower has been used for actual flowers for a hell of a long time, not to mention the loads of implications linked to it. Symbolic flowers should get their own tag.

@SystemXS: My impression is also, as Danielx21 shows, that...

2011-12-08T19:12:02-05:00

My impression is also, as Danielx21 shows, that commonly "motified" objects are tagged for anything that resembles them, so +1 for flower_(plant) to distinguish actual flowers.

@titaniachkt: > Danielx21 said: > So, maybe we could have: > ...

2011-12-08T18:37:07-05:00

Danielx21 said:
So, maybe we could have:

flower / flower_(symbol)

+1 to that

Or maybe even flower_(plant) as the converse

@Danielx21: > Hillside_Moose said: > I'm for keeping flower...

2011-12-08T04:53:13-05:00

Hillside_Moose said:
I'm for keeping flower for actual flowers, not for anything vaguely resembling the shape of a flower.

We already have these distinctions:

So, maybe we could have:

flower / flower_(symbol)

The last would tag post #1049037.

@Hillside_Moose: I'm for keeping flower for actual flowers, not...

2011-12-08T03:40:56-05:00

I'm for keeping flower for actual flowers, not for anything vaguely resembling the shape of a flower.

@ghostrigger: > Danielx21 said: > Implications: > > * floral...

2011-12-07T07:32:09-05:00

Danielx21 said:
Implications:

floral background -> flower

i'll just ask, if the flower tag is used for anything that is or resembles a flower (motif, actual flower/part of plant)?

i've read forum #25118, and it seems the implication of floral_print -> flower didn't push through 2 years ago because we're still undecided of flower's definition?

@Danielx21: Aliases: * flower background -> floral...

2011-12-07T07:06:10-05:00

Aliases:

Reason for aliases:

noun background -> adjective background

Implications:

Reason for implications:

pattern background -> pattern

EDIT:

Removed only this implication as controversial.

floral background -> flower