Tag Implications: breast -> breasts

@jxh2154: > Bloodletter said: > breasts apart and...

2011-12-30T17:56:13-05:00

Bloodletter said:
breasts apart and unaligned breasts seem safe enough to implicate. The rest of those don't necessarily require breasts to be prominent or otherwise larger than a flat chest.

Did these two.

@Bloodletter: > Danielx21 said: > Given the description, and...

2011-12-27T19:27:41-05:00

Danielx21 said:
Given the description, and the majority of posts, of hair over breasts ("A form of convenient censoring involving a topless female with only her hair protecting her modesty."), then it might be better to change it to hair_over_nipples.

That may be the definition, but it has also been in popular use for when hair is shown draped over the breasts themselves, leaving the nipples uncovered. hair over breasts + convenient censoring would get you hair over nipples. The wiki should just be broadened and the tag left alone.

@Bloodletter: breasts apart and unaligned breasts seem safe...

2011-12-27T19:20:14-05:00

breasts apart and unaligned breasts seem safe enough to implicate. The rest of those don't necessarily require breasts to be prominent or otherwise larger than a flat chest.

@Danielx21: > RaisingK said: > -1. You're forgetting flat...

2011-12-27T19:18:47-05:00

RaisingK said:
-1. You're forgetting flat chest, which doesn't qualify for breasts but can fit various *breast* tags. Take hair_over_breasts flat_chest, for instance. This doesn't apply to all of the tags you listed but it does to quite a few.

Given the description, and the majority of posts, of hair over breasts ("A form of convenient censoring involving a topless female with only her hair protecting her modesty."), then it might be better ro change it to hair_over_nipples.

@RaisingK: > nice_starship said: > Obviously there's a few...

2011-12-27T19:02:13-05:00

nice_starship said:
Obviously there's a few exceptions like breastplate, but almost every tag with "breast" in it should imply breasts.

-1. You're forgetting flat chest, which doesn't qualify for breasts but can fit various *breast* tags. Take hair_over_breasts flat_chest, for instance. This doesn't apply to all of the tags you listed but it does to quite a few.

@Danielx21: Related discussion: * forum #68808 ("Tag...

2011-12-27T18:11:45-05:00

Related discussion:

forum #68808 ("Tag Implication: breast pillow -> breasts ")

@nice_starship: There are a ton of tags containing "breast"...

2011-12-27T18:04:11-05:00

There are a ton of tags containing "breast" without a breasts implication. These are the most popular ones:

between_breasts -> breasts
breast_biting -> breasts
breast_bondage -> breasts
breast_clinging -> breasts
breast_envy -> breasts
breast_feeding -> breasts
breast_hold -> breasts
breast_licking -> breasts
breast_lift -> breasts
breast_massage -> breasts
breast_pillow -> breasts
breast_poke -> breasts
breast_sucking -> breasts
breast_suppress -> breasts
breasts_apart -> breasts
breasts_outside -> breasts
hair_over_breasts -> breasts
mole_on_breast -> breasts
unaligned_breasts -> breasts

Obviously there's a few exceptions like breastplate, but almost every tag with "breast" in it should imply breasts.

Tag Implications: *breast* -> breasts