tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/7556 Tag Implication: white_wings -> wings 2018-01-15T06:00:40-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142028 2018-01-15T06:00:40-05:00 2018-01-15T06:00:40-05:00 @nonamethanks: > iridescent_slime said: > > Bumping this... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Bumping this ancient thread since the subject was mentioned in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/138266">forum #138266</a>.</p> <p>Is it still necessary that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> apply specifically to feathered wings? None of the other colored wings tags (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">white_wings</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/red_wings">red_wings</a>, etc.) were ever subject to this restriction, which makes this tag sort of an oddball. Now that a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=black_wings%20feathered_wings">black_wings feathered_wings</a> search is possible, the major argument in favor of this restriction (feathered wings being crowded out by bat/demon wings) needn't be a concern any longer. Can this rule finally be dropped?</p> </blockquote><p>I agree with the others, no need to limit it to feathered wings.</p> nonamethanks /users/508240 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/142022 2018-01-15T03:21:31-05:00 2018-01-15T06:09:16-05:00 @user_525419: > iridescent_slime said: > > Bumping this... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Bumping this ancient thread since the subject was mentioned in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/138266">forum #138266</a>.</p> <p>Is it still necessary that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> apply specifically to feathered wings? None of the other colored wings tags (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">white_wings</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/red_wings">red_wings</a>, etc.) were ever subject to this restriction, which makes this tag sort of an oddball. Now that a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=black_wings%20feathered_wings">black_wings feathered_wings</a> search is possible, the major argument in favor of this restriction (feathered wings being crowded out by bat/demon wings) needn't be a concern any longer. Can this rule finally be dropped?</p> </blockquote><p>There is absolutely no point in making thid distinction.<br>I don't know the reasoning why this was written but if we assume that those wings are black anyway, then I think <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=morrigan_aensland_%28vampire%29">morrigan_aensland_(vampire)</a> should show some pink-black colored wings. Meaning not every bat wing is actually black.</p> user_525419 /users/525419 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141992 2018-01-14T19:37:55-05:00 2018-01-14T19:37:55-05:00 @Unbreakable: > iridescent_slime said: > > Bumping this... <blockquote> <p>iridescent_slime said:</p> <p>Bumping this ancient thread since the subject was mentioned in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/138266">forum #138266</a>.</p> <p>Is it still necessary that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> apply specifically to feathered wings? None of the other colored wings tags (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">white_wings</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/red_wings">red_wings</a>, etc.) were ever subject to this restriction, which makes this tag sort of an oddball. Now that a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=black_wings%20feathered_wings">black_wings feathered_wings</a> search is possible, the major argument in favor of this restriction (feathered wings being crowded out by bat/demon wings) needn't be a concern any longer. Can this rule finally be dropped?</p> </blockquote><p>I know I have tagged bat and demon wings with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black wings</a> in the past so I'm all for making it official, there's not need to restrict it to feathered wings only.</p> Unbreakable /users/430030 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/141990 2018-01-14T19:21:19-05:00 2018-01-14T19:21:19-05:00 @iridescent_slime: Bumping this ancient thread since the subject... <p>Bumping this ancient thread since the subject was mentioned in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/138266">forum #138266</a>.</p><p>Is it still necessary that <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> apply specifically to feathered wings? None of the other colored wings tags (<a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/white_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">white_wings</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/red_wings">red_wings</a>, etc.) were ever subject to this restriction, which makes this tag sort of an oddball. Now that a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=black_wings%20feathered_wings">black_wings feathered_wings</a> search is possible, the major argument in favor of this restriction (feathered wings being crowded out by bat/demon wings) needn't be a concern any longer. Can this rule finally be dropped?</p> iridescent_slime /users/438068 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74838 2012-03-04T02:19:26-05:00 2012-03-04T02:19:26-05:00 @alegria: It doesn't have very many images yet, but I... <p>It doesn't have very many images yet, but I started the tag.</p><p>Is <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feathered_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">feathered_wings</a> for all feather wings, or just ones that aren't <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">angel_wings</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a>?</p> alegria /users/318096 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74777 2012-03-03T19:23:59-05:00 2012-03-03T19:23:59-05:00 @jxh2154: Go with creating feathered_wings (will alias... <p>Go with creating <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/feathered_wings" title="This wiki page does not exist">feathered_wings</a> (will alias feather_wings to it). It would be applied manually.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74404 2012-02-23T05:35:50-05:00 2012-02-23T05:35:50-05:00 @NWF_Renim: > Rampardos said: > Angel_wings and... <blockquote><p>Rampardos said:<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">Angel_wings</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/white_feathered_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">white_feathered_wings</a> should be kept separate. They're pretty closely related but it's not unheard of to have angel wings that are a color that isn't white. If anything, keeping them separate would be a good way to find the ones that are or aren't.</p></blockquote><p>We shouldn't do that, because then the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">angel_wings</a> tag is nothing more than a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=angel%20wings">angel wings</a> search.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74403 2012-02-23T05:26:31-05:00 2012-02-23T05:26:31-05:00 @Rampardos: Angel_wings and white_feathered_wings should be... <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">Angel_wings</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/white_feathered_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">white_feathered_wings</a> should be kept separate. They're pretty closely related but it's not unheard of to have angel wings that are a color that isn't white. If anything, keeping them separate would be a good way to find the ones that are or aren't.</p> Rampardos /users/121913 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74392 2012-02-22T22:44:24-05:00 2012-02-22T22:44:24-05:00 @Log: feathered would probably be the more correct term. <p>feathered would probably be the more correct term.</p> Log /users/9509 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74391 2012-02-22T22:41:32-05:00 2012-02-22T22:41:32-05:00 @Danielx21: > NWF_Renim said: > I would support making a... <blockquote><p>NWF_Renim said:<br>I would support making a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">feather_wings</a> tag, as that is a common type that can come in different colors outside of the common white and black.</p></blockquote><p>+1 for umbrella term.</p> Danielx21 /users/345814 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74390 2012-02-22T22:38:53-05:00 2012-02-22T22:38:53-05:00 @dean_exia: > NWF_Renim said: > I would support making a... <blockquote><p>NWF_Renim said:<br>I would support making a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">feather_wings</a> tag, as that is a common type that can come in different colors outside of the common white and black.</p></blockquote><p>+1 for umbrella term.</p> dean_exia /users/351692 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74389 2012-02-22T22:35:14-05:00 2012-02-22T22:35:14-05:00 @NWF_Renim: I guess I'll quickly throw out some other... <p>I guess I'll quickly throw out some other thoughts on this.</p><p>Aliasing the current <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> tag to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> will still have the same problem because users who are not bothering to look at how it is defined will also likely still make the mistake of using <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> even after the alias for any set of wings that are black. The only real solution would be to mass edit the images to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> after cleaning up the ~3% of images that are currently using the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> tag incorrectly. (Despite the claim of confusion over the naming of this tag, it is pretty consistent overall with what is being tagged).</p><p>If need be, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">angel_wings</a> should then be aliased to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/white_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">white_feather_wings</a>, as that is what the tag is for. The tag should not have been used for other kinds of wings, as it was tagging a very specific style of wing and not any wing simply attached to what you might call an angel.</p><p>I would support making a <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">feather_wings</a> tag, as that is a common type that can come in different colors outside of the common white and black.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/74383 2012-02-22T19:29:22-05:00 2012-02-22T19:29:22-05:00 @Danielx21: *bumps* <p>*bumps*</p> Danielx21 /users/345814 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73138 2012-01-26T09:02:13-05:00 2012-01-26T09:02:13-05:00 @alegria: Then I repeat: please alias/rename black_wings... <p>Then I repeat: please alias/rename <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_angel_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_angel_wings</a>, so the tag name matches what the tag is supposed to be for. The current name + usage does not match any of the other color tags, such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_hair">black_hair</a> (any black hair), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_legwear">black_legwear</a> (any black legwear), <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_dress">black_dress</a> (any black dress).</p><p>Since we're on the topic, should <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">angel_wings</a> also be used for odd-color wings, or is it strictly for white wings? If it is strictly white, is there another way to tag the wing type on images like these?<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/712850">post #712850</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1083554">post #1083554</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/680863">post #680863</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/785054">post #785054</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/672601">post #672601</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/225169">post #225169</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1040422">post #1040422</a></p> alegria /users/318096 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73132 2012-01-26T07:13:54-05:00 2012-01-26T07:19:10-05:00 @NWF_Renim: > alegria said: > +1 for making color wing tags... <blockquote> <p>alegria said:<br>+1 for making color wing tags and wing types separate tags, like the legwear/hair tags.</p> <p>If not, please rename <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> - I've never looked at the wiki for that one because the name seems so self explanatory (wings that are black).</p> </blockquote><p>Generally the type of wing is usually the determining factor of the color of the wings. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">Black_wings</a> were restricted to feathered wings because the other common types, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/bat_wings">bat_wings</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/demon_wings">demon_wings</a> are traditionally black to begin with and so tagging them <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> is fairly redundant. <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel_wings">Angel_wings</a> are restricted to white feathered wings because that is the most common type of wings angels are depicted with. Trying to broaden it out to other types of wings makes the tag redundant with the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/angel">angel</a> tag.</p><p>The other types of wings, like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/butterfly_wings">butterfly_wings</a> are typically multicolored and applying colored wing tags to those will just generate a lot of noise. Applying them to wing types such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/dragon_wings">dragon_wings</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fairy_wings">fairy_wings</a> might work, but again for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fairy_wings">fairy_wings</a> they're most commonly a transparent blue color, making use of color on those seems rather redundant as the natural state of their wings are typically those colors. Furthermore there are "elemental" wing types, such as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fiery_wings">fiery wings</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/ice_wings">ice wings</a> and those have a natural color, but it would be wrong imo to place such wings under colored_wing tags as well, because the very nature of what they are is what gives them their color. </p><p>Suggesting there is a necessity for colored wings that cover everything doesn't really seem very useful in the end, because certain types of wings are going to dominate these tags. Certainly you can make a <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=color%20-type">color -type</a> search remove the dominate type, but in the end what you're going to find is that for certain colors such as black, red, purple, and white that restricted usage of these colors for only certain types of wings in the end will make them more useful than trying to broadly use them for all types.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73131 2012-01-26T06:34:54-05:00 2012-01-26T06:35:47-05:00 @Danielx21: > alegria said: > +1 for making color wing tags... <blockquote> <p>alegria said:<br>+1 for making color wing tags and wing types separate tags, like the legwear/hair tags.</p> <p>If not, please rename <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> - I've never looked at the wiki for that one because the name seems so self explanatory (wings that are black).</p> </blockquote><p>I agree with these ideas wholly.</p> Danielx21 /users/345814 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73130 2012-01-26T06:24:40-05:00 2012-01-26T06:24:40-05:00 @alegria: +1 for making color wing tags and wing types... <p>+1 for making color wing tags and wing types separate tags, like the legwear/hair tags.</p><p>If not, please rename <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/black_feather_wings" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">black_feather_wings</a> - I've never looked at the wiki for that one because the name seems so self explanatory (wings that are black).</p> alegria /users/318096 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73087 2012-01-25T09:02:38-05:00 2012-01-25T09:02:38-05:00 @Aristocrat: Shouldn't we make sure that these definitions... <p>Shouldn't we make sure that these definitions for [color]_wings are consistent? </p> Aristocrat /users/340321 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73072 2012-01-25T04:41:53-05:00 2012-01-25T04:44:35-05:00 @NWF_Renim: It's true that wings don't have to be made of... <p>It's true that wings don't have to be made of feathers, but it should be pointed out that the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/black_wings">black_wings</a> tag is also restricted for use on feathered wings only.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/73070 2012-01-25T03:40:28-05:00 2012-01-25T03:40:28-05:00 @Aristocrat: Wings don't necessarily need to be made of... <p>Wings don't necessarily need to be made of feathers. </p> Aristocrat /users/340321