Implicating bracelet -> jewelry.

Reason:

Done.

If we do bracelet, we ought also do anklet, necklace, ring, brooch and earrings.

Possibly also choker, locket, amulet, pendant, circlet, tiara, crown.

There might be more, I'm not sure.

I guess it depends how broadly jewelry is defined. I never wold have thought to add choker, for example. But yes, anklet, necklace, ring, brooch and earrings are obvious enough. Did them.

Question: Does a circlet count as jewellery?

If so, should it be implicated as well?

create implication circlet -> jewelry

If not, how come? If it matters,wikipedia seems to count it as such, along with tiara and crown
-
Additionally, what about toe ring?

Should it be implicated to ring (and hence jewelry)?

create implication toe_ring -> ring

Circlet/tiara/crown are more hats than jewelery, at least for me.

Log said:
Circlet/tiara/crown are more hats than jewelery, at least for me.

Out of curiosity, how come? Usually hats cover at least the hair, these items are more about décor than providing any form of practical utility...

Hats as in "clothing and accessories that go on the head", much like a headdress or hairband, rather than clothing to cover the head. (At a guess)

I wouldn't call either of those hat, but what do I know...