Tag Implication: pantyshot_(standing) -> pantyshot

@Danielx21: > S1eth said: > standing was used only for...

2012-09-29T09:49:07-04:00

S1eth said:
standing was used only for characters standing upright (no bent_over or leaning_forward), but I see Danielx21 changed the wiki.

Oh, sorry.

In my defense, IIRC, the tag standing really had some hundreds of posts with people bent over or leaning while standing, even before I edited the wiki.

Also, searches like bent_over sitting, bent_over standing and bent_over kneeling yeld different results - with someone bent over while sitting, or while kneeling, etc. There is some noticeable noise, though, when distinct people with different postures appear in the same image.

@MyrMindservant: Related discussion: forum #78699. I think we...

2012-09-28T12:59:31-04:00

Related discussion: forum #78699.
I think we should finish that discussion before thinking about any implications.

@S1eth: standing was used only for characters standing...

2012-09-28T03:55:24-04:00

standing was used only for characters standing upright (no bent_over or leaning_forward), but I see Danielx21 changed the wiki.

pantyshot_(standing) also says characters "standing normally", whatever that's supposed to mean.

Depending on the restrictions to "standing" we put on both of these tags, the implication may or may not make sense.

edit: Similar case: crossed_legs_(standing)

@Kikimaru: Implicating pantyshot_(standing) -> pantyshot. ...

2012-09-28T03:36:09-04:00

Implicating pantyshot_(standing) -> pantyshot.

Reason: Subset.

Additionally:
Implicating pantyshot_(standing) -> standing