ion288 said:
post #192581 post #23107 and post #22811 are all locked to Q. They seem safe to me according to current rating standards.
post #22879 Is also locked. Is that dress risque enough for that?
Everything's Safe.
Posted under General
ion288 said:
post #192581 post #23107 and post #22811 are all locked to Q. They seem safe to me according to current rating standards.
post #22879 Is also locked. Is that dress risque enough for that?
Everything's Safe.
post #2939223 (loli)
Apparently, people can't seem to decide wether this is Q or E.
It’s Questionable.
I'd say as precedent (or whatever it would be called): If the character is just standing, bottomless, then it is rated q for females. For males it might still be rated e.
I guess that's also reflected in the wiki: If the genitals aren't blatantly exposed, use q.
Chiera said:
I'd say as precedent (or whatever it would be called): If the character is just standing, bottomless, then it is rated q for females. For males it might still be rated e.
I guess that's also reflected in the wiki: If the genitals aren't blatantly exposed, use q.
That's how I've been rating, if it's just there and isn't made as to draw attention to it I rate it q.
post #2940816 shows exactly the dillema, though.
Rating Q or E? The vagina is definitely more in the focus of attention here.
(And while we're here: Loli or not?)
Chiera said:
post #2940816 shows exactly the dillema, though.
Rating Q or E? The vagina is definitely more in the focus of attention here.(And while we're here: Loli or not?)
I'd tag that as E just to be on the safe side, unsure about loli thought so anyone else?
Chiera said:
post #2940816 shows exactly the dillema, though.
Rating Q or E? The vagina is definitely more in the focus of attention here.(And while we're here: Loli or not?)
loli and E.
post #2413841
Is this pussy blatantly exposed enough to keep at E?
ion288 said:
post #2413841
Is this pussy blatantly exposed enough to keep at E?
Yes.
post #2840343. That is supposed to be a glowing penis. Should it really be rated S?
Also post #1053553 is a fine art parody but that is a blatantly exposed penis.
Updated
ion288 said:
post #2840343. That is supposed to be a glowing penis. Should it really be rated S?
Also post #1053553 is a fine art parody but that is a blatantly exposed penis.
I'd put them both under Q.
post #2737653
post #2763941
Is that really Safe?
kittey said:
post #2737653
post #2763941
Is that really Safe?
This is one of those tricky cases imo, I would rate the first q at last since the focus is on the crotch.
Is the genital of left hand side character in post #2968869 not blatantly exposed enough to be considered explicit?
c933103 said:
Is the genital of left hand side character in post #2968869 not blatantly exposed enough to be considered explicit?
You can't even see the so called cleft of venus.
So no.
post #2939906
Is her spreading her pussy enough for this post to be rated "explicit"? I kinda feel conflicted about this.
arisboch said:
post #2939906
Is her spreading her pussy enough for this post to be rated "explicit"? I kinda feel conflicted about this.
Yes, spread pussy is always explicit.
arisboch said:
post #2939906
Is her spreading her pussy enough for this post to be rated "explicit"? I kinda feel conflicted about this.
It is an unusually tastefully spread pussy but yes it is absolutely explicit.
post #1581486
Nothing on this image points at anything explicit whatsoever. The same goes for post #1579004. I'd say the only variant that warrants an explicit rating is the second one in the row.