wings
Never did a catch all tag topic before so not sure how to present it. Only one I don't think needs to be implicated is the light_hawk_wings.

Already implicated

angel_wings
bat_wings
black_wings
butterfly_wings
demon_wings
dragon_wings
insect_wings
mechanical_wings

Fairy_wings, if it isn't already. Are we going to include stuff like head_wings as well? There are several others like that that could probably stand to get implied wings-tagging.

No, not head wings we already had that discussion but I don't feel like digging it up.

Did the two mentioned (fairy and lhw).

ah, so I just post the tags for implication?
if so:

Common Type

• mini angel wings
• mini demon wings

Insect Type

• moth wings

Style Type / Misc

• alternate wings
• asymmetrical wings
• plant wings
• single wing
• torn wings
  ______
• bowed wings (bowed meaning arched downward)
• faux wings
• heart wings
• lower back wings
• multiple wings

Color

• red wings

Action

• wing grab
• wingjob

bumps

Oops, missed that post.

All done.

BTW, this will sound really trivial, but when posting tags for implicating or aliasing, try to keep the underscores between words. That way I can just copy/paste and not have to go and add all the underscores myself (which takes time, even if only a little, and increases the chance I'll make a typo).

I understand, ^.^
will do

Requesting tag de-implication single_wing -> wings
Reason: Wings usually come in pairs, but the single ones do not; like single earring case.

Not too sure about your example case there.

jxh2154 said in forum #69853:
As for not tagging "earrings" when single_earring is present... ehhh I dunno. For example I just did single_thighhigh -> thighhighs today and that seems perfectly sensible to me. If someone is wearing earrings, they're wearing earrings, whether it's 1 or 100.

It's true it makes it harder to find "one girl with one earring next to another girl with two" but you could make variations of that statement for quite a lot of implications. I'm not sure that unlikely search negates the implication.

Also, while the single_earring tag explains that you should only use it when both ears are visible and you know that the character wears only a single one, the single_wing wiki currently says "It may either not exist or be cut off.". (which is not how I'd use that tag btw)

S1eth said:
Not too sure about your example case there.

forum #69904. Same goes to single wing.

I think the benefit of having all wings under an umbrella tag is the most important part here so I'd rather keep the implication.