Loli/shota check thread.

@Kikimaru: post #3823942 Doesn't appear to be loli...

2020-03-25T09:37:53-04:00

Doesn't appear to be loli despite being a bit suggestive.

@RIGperu: I didn't know that tagging "loli" makes the pic...

2020-03-20T09:58:27-04:00

I didn't know that tagging "loli" makes the pic "premium exclusive" and now i blocked my sfw upload, can someone with a gold account please remove the tag?
Here is the pic.
>/posts/3828428

@iridescent_slime: post #3827752 I didn't hesitate to add loli to...

2020-03-20T02:16:03-04:00

post #3827752

I didn't hesitate to add loli to this one because I frankly can't see how it could be anything else; her head is proportionally large, her pelvis isn't particularly wide, and that elementary schoolers' backpack in the background isn't helping. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

@Unbreakable: post #3818782 (tag was added by another user)

2020-03-18T10:43:56-04:00

post #3818782

(tag was added by another user)

@ion288: > blindVigil said: > > post #3814136 > >...

2020-03-13T08:14:28-04:00

blindVigil said:

post #3814136

Don't think there's nearly enough of anything sexual here to be considered loli, or questionable for that matter

There is a bit of a cameltoe and it is clearly a child. Thus it is Q loli, at least according to current definitions.

blindVigil said:

post #3813428 isn't tagged, but all of its siblings are

post #3812177 and post #3812183 have the reverse problem, they're tagged but none of their siblings are.

I don't think I would tag any of them as loli, but whatever people decide it should at least be consistent.

I would agree on the first part being petite rather than loli, the second example looks to weird for me to rule on.
Do we have a stance on bad anatomy lolis?

@blindVigil: post #3813428 isn't tagged, but all of its...

2020-03-11T18:44:16-04:00

post #3813428 isn't tagged, but all of its siblings are

post #3812177 and post #3812183 have the reverse problem, they're tagged but none of their siblings are.

I don't think I would tag any of them as loli, but whatever people decide it should at least be consistent.

@blindVigil: post #3814136 Don't think there's nearly...

2020-03-11T06:19:52-04:00

post #3814136

Don't think there's nearly enough of anything sexual here to be considered loli, or questionable for that matter

@Unbreakable: > iridescent_slime said: > > post #3668553 > ...

2020-03-09T21:42:24-04:00

iridescent_slime said:

post #3668553

Rating check as well. "Tasteful" panty shots are Safe. This one isn't particularly revealing or suggestive, and it's not a focal point of the image anyway. I'm not sure why else this post would be tagged loli.

I don't see any reason for this to be anything else than safe, though I know this uploader often "overuse" rating:q and loli.

@iridescent_slime: post #3668553 Rating check as well. "Tasteful"...

2020-03-09T21:21:52-04:00

post #3668553

Rating check as well. "Tasteful" panty shots are Safe. This one isn't particularly revealing or suggestive, and it's not a focal point of the image anyway. I'm not sure why else this post would be tagged loli.

@ion288: > Guaro1238 said: > > post #3796517Im gonna...

2020-03-06T11:33:16-05:00

Guaro1238 said:

post #3796517

Im gonna say no on this one.

Jigsy said:

post #3805073

Yes very much so.

user_711026 said:

post #3805575

Doesnt really look like child anatomy, though possibly flaggable bad anatomy.

@user_711026: post #3805575

2020-03-01T18:04:07-05:00

post #3805575

@Jigsy: post #3805073

2020-03-01T05:23:34-05:00

post #3805073

@Guaro1238: post #3796517

2020-02-25T08:44:18-05:00

post #3796517

@guywholikesanim: > iridescent_slime said: > > It's actually...

2020-02-24T14:26:59-05:00

iridescent_slime said:

It's actually gone back and forth a few times over the years. Personally, I think the splash censoring here is itself just suggestive to make this borderline loli. It draws more attention to her chest than if it weren't censored in the first place, kind of like all the micro_bikini loli posts that look more sexualized than they would if they were simply naked.

True. It's like how some of the pictures in the Artistic Nudes pool have censoring, which kinda defeats the purpose of it being an artistic nude.

On a side note, maybe it shouldn't be in the Loli vs. Child section of the loli tag's wiki page, given how much it goes back and forth.

@iridescent_slime: > guywholikesanim said: > > post #2318923 used...

2020-02-24T14:21:27-05:00

guywholikesanim said:

post #2318923 used to be tagged just child but now it's been tagged as loli. I don't see any reason for this, it was just child for the longest time and there's no sexual content.

It's actually gone back and forth a few times over the years. Personally, I think the splash censoring here is itself just suggestive to make this borderline loli. It draws more attention to her chest than if it weren't censored in the first place, kind of like all the micro_bikini loli posts that look more sexualized than they would if they were simply naked.

@guywholikesanim: post #2318923 used to be tagged just child but...

2020-02-24T14:01:28-05:00

post #2318923 used to be tagged just child but now it's been tagged as loli. I don't see any reason for this, it was just child for the longest time and there's no sexual content.

@Shibi: post #3796960 isn't loli but I can't fix it. Is...

2020-02-23T15:50:23-05:00

post #3796960 isn't loli but I can't fix it. Is it because I don't have gold?(・ω・`)

@Death_Usagi: post #3785340 and its entire child posts

2020-02-14T23:37:46-05:00

post #3785340 and its entire child posts

@Flopsy: I've thought of her as being in the 10-12...

2020-02-14T21:17:27-05:00

I've thought of her as being in the 10-12 range, but according to this official profile she's 14 in the original game. The teenage tags have been removed.

@kittey: > Flopsy said: > > Speaking of teenagers,...

2020-02-14T09:37:08-05:00

Flopsy said:

Speaking of teenagers, aren't the teenage and loli tags on post #3783547 a contradiction?

From the looks of other posts, isn’t she canonically teenaged anyway? In that case, the teenage tag doesn’t make sense at all.