Danbooru

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

post #3302145
post #2467359

These two posts have tags I have blacklisted. I suspect they’re not loli because the user who added tagged them as such also incorrectly applied the loli tag to several other posts, which I already sent a message about.

post #3444188

The perspective makes it hard to see how developed her hips are, but her rounded tummy and overall proportions seem borderline loli-ish to me. Figured I'd ask for a second opinion.

iridescent_slime said:

post #3444188

The perspective makes it hard to see how developed her hips are, but her rounded tummy and overall proportions seem borderline loli-ish to me. Figured I'd ask for a second opinion.

I think it qualifies for loli.

iridescent_slime said:

post #3451778

The child post was tagged loli. If nudity alone justifies the tag, I see no reason why this one shouldn't be tagged the same.

It has to be sexual in nature. That doesn't meet the requirements, I believe.

iridescent_slime said:

I tagged post #3497503 just to be on the safe side. Her proportions (short limbs, nonexistent hips) seem pretty childlike. Feel free to change the tags if you think she's merely petite.

While I agree she looks like a child, I don't think the image is explicit enough to warrant the loli tag.

shade_30 said:

While I agree she looks like a child, I don't think the image is explicit enough to warrant the loli tag.

I'd say the nudity and sideboob is enough to have it as q, therefore it should be tagged as loli if the tag applies.

somethingsomething said:

post #3511868 There's been some back and forth on this one; I don't want to get in an editing war with a user that's made a total of two post changes.

Not loli.