tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/8915 Vividred Operation character tagging [spoilers] 2013-02-03T09:21:10-05:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83644 2013-02-03T09:21:10-05:00 2013-02-03T09:21:10-05:00 @Lynx190: Considering that danbooru tagging is generally... <p>Considering that danbooru tagging is generally about "what you see", it seems like the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fusion">fusion</a> tag barely applies anyway. Even though the characters are technically fusing in the context of the anime, the resulting product looks much more like a new character than a mixture of the two. (especially <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/vividyellow">vividyellow</a> who looks more like Mami + Neito than Akane + Himawari). Certainly tagging the separate characters makes no sense since you can't see them.</p> Lynx190 /users/16127 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83606 2013-02-02T06:29:32-05:00 2013-02-02T06:29:32-05:00 @ghostrigger: just an observation, i think the reason why... <p>just an observation, i think the reason why people continue adding chartags of the two *docking* girls is because they're also adding the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fusion">fusion</a> tag. it quite fits in the wiki definition though. my question will be, should the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fusion">fusion</a> tag still necessary if the merged entity has a name?</p><p>i would suggest that the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fusion">fusion</a> tag be limited to make-believe (unnamed) artist creations like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1352687">post #1352687</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1345276">post #1345276</a> . in this scenario, adding chartags of participating characters are expected. thoughts? thanks.</p> ghostrigger /users/352944 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83446 2013-01-29T17:22:04-05:00 2013-01-29T17:22:04-05:00 @jxh2154: Just for the record, I also agree on making... <p>Just for the record, I also agree on making them separate.</p> jxh2154 /users/1309 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83359 2013-01-27T23:51:00-05:00 2013-01-27T23:51:00-05:00 @Hillside_Moose: +1. Treat them as separate characters. <p>+1. Treat them as separate characters.</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83354 2013-01-27T11:20:59-05:00 2013-01-27T11:20:59-05:00 @NWF_Renim: +1 to your proposal, EB. <p>+1 to your proposal, EB.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83353 2013-01-27T10:49:12-05:00 2013-01-27T10:49:12-05:00 @EB: So, no objections to removing character tags?... <p>So, no objections to removing character tags? This also applies to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/vividgreen">vividgreen</a> and whatever else pops up.</p> EB /users/11672 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83231 2013-01-22T23:40:16-05:00 2013-01-23T01:24:27-05:00 @ghostrigger: my personal opinion on this is vividblue should... <p>my personal opinion on this is <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/vividblue">vividblue</a> should be a separate character much like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/gotenks">gotenks</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/gogeta">gogeta</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/vegetto">vegetto</a>.</p><p>and something related, how exactly should we tag them after the individual transformation and *docking*: <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/mecha_musume">mecha_musume</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/magical_girl">magical_girl</a>, or both? as it appears nobody tagged them as such as of now.</p> ghostrigger /users/352944 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/83230 2013-01-22T23:17:48-05:00 2013-02-03T09:21:10-05:00 @EB: I noticed that all images of vividblue are... <p>I noticed that all images of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/vividblue">vividblue</a> are currently tagged with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/isshiki_akane">isshiki_akane</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/futaba_aoi_%28vividred_operation%29">futaba_aoi_(vividred_operation)</a>, but I don't think she should be as she's visually distinct from both of them. I'd only add the tags when they also appear pre-fusion as in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1346128">post #1346128</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1346041">post #1346041</a>.</p> EB /users/11672