tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/9062 Solo tag usage discussion 2013-04-28T19:47:57-04:00 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87883 2013-04-28T19:47:42-04:00 2013-04-28T19:47:57-04:00 @NWF_Renim: Solo_focus is still a taggable concept... <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">Solo_focus</a> is still a taggable concept pertaining to a specific way the image is visually arranged though, especially for those when characters are in close proximity and interacting (of which the majority of images tagged are currently of).</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87879 2013-04-28T17:31:50-04:00 2013-04-28T17:31:50-04:00 @MagicalAsparagus: > NWF_Renim said: > > While it may have... <blockquote> <p>NWF_Renim said:</p> <p>While it may have introduced some new problems, I would 100% disagree with reverting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> back to the way it was and incorporating <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> images back into it.</p> </blockquote><p>Nooo, I mean not tag them as solo, not tag them with anything. for instance, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1403771">post #1403771</a> would be tagged with just <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/1girl">1girl</a>.</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87878 2013-04-28T17:28:37-04:00 2013-04-28T17:30:18-04:00 @NWF_Renim: While it may have introduced some new problems,... <p>While it may have introduced some new problems, I would 100% disagree with reverting <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> back to the way it was and incorporating <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> images back into it. Having images of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/gangbang">gangbangs</a> tagged <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> is ridiculous and the only reason they were under solo is because of that stupid clause about "faceless" characters not counting as people in the image.</p> NWF_Renim /users/13392 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87877 2013-04-28T17:03:16-04:00 2013-04-28T17:03:44-04:00 @MagicalAsparagus: > S1eth said: > I don't even know why I would... <blockquote><p>S1eth said:<br>I don't even know why I would want to search specifically for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a>.</p></blockquote><p>Well, me neither. I thought it would be better just to leave those kind of images without <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> and let it be (tag as <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/%2Agirl" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">*girl</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/%2Aboy" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">*boy</a>), but the new tag was introduced and populated before i knew it &gt;_&lt;</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87876 2013-04-28T16:59:21-04:00 2013-04-28T16:59:21-04:00 @S1eth: Personally, I think this worked much better... <p>Personally, I think this worked much better when we had only the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> tag, and I don't even know why I would want to search specifically for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a>. I'd like it much more if one of them could be used as an umbrella tag (implcation) and the other as a specialization.<br>All the issues <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> had were just moved to another tag while introducing new issues.</p><p>1 human with any amount of animals would normally be <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> except if the animal is a (named?) character in the series.<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/konpaku_youmu_%28ghost%29">konpaku_youmu_(ghost)</a> / <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1359059">post #1359059</a> are <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a>. That was the point of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> to begin with, since chartags:1 is unreliable.<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1359059">post #1359059</a> is one character just as much as <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=tatara_kogasa%20karakasa_obake">tatara_kogasa karakasa_obake</a> is.</p> S1eth /users/53985 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87874 2013-04-28T16:45:25-04:00 2013-04-28T16:45:25-04:00 @Toks: I've updated the solo wiki to point to solo... <p>I've updated the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> wiki to point to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo focus</a>.</p><blockquote> <p>itsonlyaname said:</p> <ul><li>Once the wiki change goes through, what would be the new limit of "solo" - shadow? tip of a shoe? people in the background as small as dots?<br> </li></ul> </blockquote><p>I would say that you must be able to tell that they are people (or humanoids, at least) to use solo_focus.</p><p>So if the 'dots' in the background are distinctly people, then use solo_focus; if they're just dots, use solo. If the tip of the shoe obviously belongs to a person wearing it, use solo_focus; if it might be a random object lying around, use solo.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87871 2013-04-28T16:31:48-04:00 2013-04-28T16:31:48-04:00 @MagicalAsparagus: petting solo, hetero 1boy solo, 1girl 1boy... <p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/petting_solo" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">petting solo</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/hetero_1boy_solo" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">hetero 1boy solo</a>, <br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/1girl_1boy_solo" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">1girl 1boy solo</a> all cleared up. What's wrong about <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-does-not-exist" href="/wiki_pages/faceless_rating%3Ae" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">faceless rating:e</a> ?</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87868 2013-04-28T16:07:04-04:00 2013-04-28T16:07:04-04:00 @MagicalAsparagus: > itsonlyaname said: > > Using some google... <blockquote> <p>itsonlyaname said:</p> <p>Using some google cache - solo_focus grows about 81 posts a day, solo gains 2,200 a day.</p> </blockquote><p>That's not because <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> is not used, it's me. I'm tagging all chartags:1 images with solo at the moment.</p><blockquote> <p>itsonlyaname said:</p> <p> single character with a few animals</p> </blockquote><p>I had the same question about pokemons, but nobody answered. I suggest that it will still be solo. And concerning the other cases, too.</p><p>As to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/konpaku_youmu_%28ghost%29">konpaku_youmu_(ghost)</a> - oh come on, hitodama doesn't count. </p><p>petting (mostly petting solo) - this is surely <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a><br>chartags:1 sex this is all to be put under <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> except <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/magic_penis" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">magic_penis</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/invisible_penis">invisible_penis</a> as far as I understand we have decided when the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> tag was created.</p><p>hetero 1boy solo - don't know, I am going to look at it now.<br>1girl 1boy solo - I was the one who probably made a mess - well, as well as those who tag half-body-random-guys with 1boy. We are currently discussing it in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/9341">topic #9341</a>. </p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/87866 2013-04-28T15:56:13-04:00 2013-04-28T16:02:52-04:00 @itsonlyaname: Bump solo_focus is now an established tag at... <p>Bump<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a> is now an established tag at 4.9k posts, but still heavily underused compared to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a>.<br>Using some google cache - solo_focus grows about 81 posts a day, solo gains 2,200 a day.</p><p>I'd change the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> wiki now, changing <em>"The following conditions can also warrant use of..."</em> into something like "for ... use the solo_focus tag".</p><p>A few questions:</p><ul> <li>Once the wiki change goes through, what would be the new limit of "solo" - shadow? tip of a shoe? people in the background as small as dots?</li> <li>Does <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1390185">post #1390185</a>, a single character with a few rabbits/animals, stay solo or become solo_focus?</li> <li>And these, increasing amount of focus: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/433266">post #433266</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/813601">post #813601</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/821199">post #821199</a> </li> <li> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/alice_margatroid">alice_margatroid</a> + <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/shanghai_doll">shanghai_doll</a> was mentioned before and decided by their level of activity / independance. I guess the same applies for <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/konpaku_youmu_%28ghost%29">konpaku_youmu_(ghost)</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-4" href="/wiki_pages/pyonta">pyonta</a>, etc</li> <li>Adding to above, posts like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1359059">post #1359059</a> should not be solo right?</li> </ul><p> <br>As well as mass tagging of floating penises/random faceless in rating:e --&gt;<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=petting">petting</a> (mostly <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=petting%20solo">petting solo</a>)<br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=chartags%3A1%20sex">chartags:1 sex</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=faceless%20rating%3Ae">faceless rating:e</a></p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=hetero%201boy%20solo">hetero 1boy solo</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=1girl%201boy%20solo">1girl 1boy solo</a><br><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=alice_margatroid%20solo%20chartags%3A2">alice_margatroid solo chartags:2</a></p><p>Lucky, the majority of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> (well, the "-rating:e" part is correctly tagged) thus the definition for solo/solo_focus could include something about the rating</p> itsonlyaname /users/366769 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85554 2013-03-05T07:25:24-05:00 2013-03-05T07:41:50-05:00 @Toks: > MarUsca said: > > And what about Pokemon... <blockquote> <p>MarUsca said:</p> <p>And what about Pokemon like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1149824">post #1149824</a> ?</p> </blockquote><p>Most Pokemon wouldn't get gender tags, but a humanoid one like Gardevoir is a bit tricky.</p><p>My opinion is that it should only get a gender tag if you can clearly tell it actually has a gender just by looking, such as in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1300425">post #1300425</a>.</p><p>If you can't tell the gender, such as in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1149824">post #1149824</a>, then it doesn't get gender tags.</p><p><strong>Edit:</strong> Related: <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/74347">forum #74347</a></p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85553 2013-03-05T07:12:38-05:00 2013-03-05T07:12:38-05:00 @MagicalAsparagus: > Toks said: > > Gender tags are for humanoid... <blockquote> <p>Toks said:</p> <p>Gender tags are for humanoid characters, not animals.</p> </blockquote><p>And what about Pokemon like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1149824">post #1149824</a> ?</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85552 2013-03-05T06:57:24-05:00 2013-03-05T06:57:24-05:00 @Toks: > MarUsca said: > > Yo, one more question,... <blockquote> <p>MarUsca said:</p> <p>Yo, one more question, about animalisation this time. Do posts like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/595901">post #595901</a> need a gender tag?</p> </blockquote><p>Gender tags are for humanoid characters, not animals.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85549 2013-03-05T06:34:36-05:00 2013-03-05T06:34:36-05:00 @MagicalAsparagus: Yo, one more question, about animalisation this... <p>Yo, one more question, about animalisation this time. Do posts like <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/595901">post #595901</a> need a gender tag?</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85465 2013-03-03T19:23:32-05:00 2013-03-03T19:23:32-05:00 @Toks: I've moved single_character_focus to solo_focus. <p>I've moved <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/single_character_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">single_character_focus</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a>.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85360 2013-03-02T21:41:38-05:00 2013-03-02T21:41:38-05:00 @Kadoya: Same here. Easier to type out. <p>Same here. Easier to type out.</p> Kadoya /users/136247 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85359 2013-03-02T21:27:41-05:00 2013-03-02T21:27:41-05:00 @Hillside_Moose: I prefer solo_focus, if only for the shorter... <p>I prefer <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a>, if only for the shorter length.</p> Hillside_Moose /users/85307 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85313 2013-03-02T09:34:13-05:00 2013-03-02T09:34:13-05:00 @Toks: So, does anyone have any objections to moving... <p>So, does anyone have any objections to moving <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/single_character_focus" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">single_character_focus</a> to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo_focus">solo_focus</a>?</p><p>If so, is there a better name we can use that's about as short?</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85238 2013-02-28T21:49:12-05:00 2013-02-28T21:49:12-05:00 @Toks: > souryuu9 said: > > Is the multiple views tag... <blockquote> <p>souryuu9 said:</p> <p>Is the <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=multiple%20views">multiple views</a> tag a new thing? I just noticed we have a tag called <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=various_positions">various_positions</a> that seems to be used for the same purpose.</p> </blockquote><p>Neither one is well-populated. It looks like DakuTree is the only one really using <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=multiple_views">multiple_views</a>.</p> Toks /users/356497 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85237 2013-02-28T21:44:36-05:00 2013-02-28T21:45:48-05:00 @souryuu9: Is the multiple views tag a new thing? I just... <p>Is the <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=multiple%20views">multiple views</a> tag a new thing? I just noticed we have a tag called <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=various_positions">various_positions</a> that seems to be used for the same purpose.</p> souryuu9 /users/393738 tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/85218 2013-02-28T12:47:22-05:00 2013-02-28T12:47:22-05:00 @MagicalAsparagus: Hm. Come to think about it, if we introduce the... <p>Hm. Come to think about it, if we introduce the focus tag, maybe we should expand the multiple_views tag as well?</p> MagicalAsparagus /users/313336