Yes, that part of solo's wiki should be removed and link to single_character_focus instead once the latter gets enough posts to be an established tag.
Posted under General
Yes, that part of solo's wiki should be removed and link to single_character_focus instead once the latter gets enough posts to be an established tag.
If we even want to do that.
before i use this new tag, i would like to clarify if single_character_focus should be free of solo thus both are distinct from each other?
i'm a little lost why solo was added again in post #1104511 or was that added by a script?
ghostrigger said:
before i use this new tag, i would like to clarify if single_character_focus should be free of solo thus both are distinct from each other?
i'm a little lost why solo was added again in post #1104511 or was that added by a script?
From my understanding of it, yes, they would be completely separate tags with no overlap at all.
MarUsca added solo back to that image after I removed it, probably because of his script.
(It would be best to add -single_character_focus to the search when mass-tagging solo from now on.)
My intentions of what this new tag should cover would be distinct from solo. It is a replacement tag for images that have a focus on a single character, but other characters are present, which currently has been a special condition that has been allowed under the solo tag.
Btw, it's fine to rename it to solo_focus, since that would make it easier for others to remember the name.
Updated
Can this topic be moved/renamed so it's clearer what the discussion is about?
Okay, so now I just skip posts like post #1104511 with sex with faceless males, right?
Btw, why is faceless_male tagged as 1boy? Is it supposed to be 1boy, faceless_male or both?
Toks said:
From my understanding of it, yes, they would be completely separate tags with no overlap at all.
MarUsca added solo back to that image after I removed it, probably because of his script.
(It would be best to add -single_character_focus to the search when mass-tagging solo from now on.)
Oh shoot, I did it again, sorry. Unfortunately I can't add the tag, because my search limit is already at six (touhou chartags:1 -1girl -1boy -multiple_girls date).
Also, just to clarify, dual persona is tagged as multiple girls or boys only when characters interact with each other, right?
MarUsca said:
Okay, so now I just skip posts like post #1104511 with sex with faceless males, right?
When tagging solo, yes, skip them.
MarUsca said:
Btw, why is faceless_male tagged as 1boy? Is it supposed to be 1boy, faceless_male or both?
I believe faceless males should still be tagged with #boys. I don't think everyone does that, though.
MarUsca said:
Also, just to clarify, dual persona is tagged as multiple girls or boys only when characters interact with each other, right?
By not interacting, you mean something like post #1366290, right?
I would only tag that as 1girl, not multiple_girls.
Toks said:
By not interacting, you mean something like post #1366290, right?
I would only tag that as 1girl, not multiple_girls.
Yes, well this one is obvious. I mean posts like post #668723 (well here it's harder because it's a trap, but you got the idea)
Also, is mecha supposed to be tagged with solo no_humans, just solo or solo and gender tags?
Well, and nobody mentioned cases with 1 human and pokemon, yukkuri and other creatures. Should it also be single_character_focus now or solo or nothing except gender tag?
MarUsca said:
Seems like 2boys to me. And they are interacting, by holding hands.
Toks said:
Seems like 2boys to me. And they are interacting, by holding hands.
So dual_persona all has to be checked now?
Seems easy, but I am already confused. Is post #27249 dual_persona or not?
Wow, we actually have a multiple_views tag. Now it's even more confusing.
MarUsca said:
Also, is mecha supposed to be tagged with solo no_humans, just solo or solo and gender tags?
Mecha are machines. Please don't assign them gender.
DschingisKhan said:
Mecha are machines. Please don't assign them gender.
Okay, fixing now. But they still should have the solo tag, right?
But many mecha are still characters so use the solo tag appropriately.
Just to be clear for the sake of future uploads, single_character_focus would apply to group_sex and related images with only one actual character, right?
post #1367173, for a quick example, though I imagine it would apply to a very large number of posts.
I try not to tag images like that with solo anyway, and the new tag does sound helpful for narrowing posts down, so just asking to be sure.
Xeano94 said:
Just to be clear for the sake of future uploads, single_character_focus would apply to group_sex and related images with only one actual character, right?
post #1367173, for a quick example, though I imagine it would apply to a very large number of posts.
I try not to tag images like that with solo anyway, and the new tag does sound helpful for narrowing posts down, so just asking to be sure.
Yes, your example would qualify for the tag since the focus of the image is on one character and everyone else is mostly out of frame.
Toks said:
Just to confirm:
Should posts with magic penises be single character focus instead of solo? (like post #1365956)
Should posts with invisible penises be single character focus instead of solo? (like post #77538)
Does anyone want to give their opinion on this before I start tagging?
I think they should be single_character_focus, but it's a somewhat borderline case.