tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/9276Tag Implication: g-string -> thong2013-05-03T22:31:18-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880662013-05-03T22:31:18-04:002013-05-03T22:31:18-04:00@jxh2154: Removed the thong -> panties implication.<p>Removed the thong -> panties implication.</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880482013-05-03T21:26:10-04:002013-05-03T21:26:10-04:00@Log: Context with uncertain tagged as underwear is...<p>Context with uncertain tagged as underwear is probably the best way to handle fundoshi. fundoshi as swimsuits should be pretty rare, especially here.</p>Log/users/9509tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880372013-05-03T19:53:47-04:002013-05-03T19:53:47-04:00@S1eth: > Sal.N said:
>
> What the above means is that...<blockquote>
<p>Sal.N said:</p>
<p>What the above means is that not only Toks' list, but ~3k posts under <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=swimsuit%20underwear">swimsuit underwear</a> need a look over and clean-up as well.</p>
</blockquote><p>How do we deal with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fundoshi">fundoshi</a> which is both underwear and swimwear? We could tag either or depending on context, or always tag underwear and add swimsuit when needed.</p>S1eth/users/53985tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880212013-05-03T14:10:27-04:002013-05-03T16:44:19-04:00@Sal.N: G-string is a type of thong, so the implication...<p><a rel="external nofollow noreferrer" class="dtext-link dtext-external-link dtext-named-external-link" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-string">G-string is a type of thong</a>, so the implication in the OP is correct. The problem of swimsuits being tagged with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/underwear">underwear</a> was rooted in 'thong' implicating 'panties', which is wrong and had been described very well in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/22780">forum #22780</a>: thong can be underwear, swimsuit, fundoshi, or other fantasy clothes.</p><p>What the above means is that not only Toks' list, but ~3k posts under <a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=swimsuit%20underwear">swimsuit underwear</a> need a look over and clean-up as well.</p><p>The only thing I'm afraid of is that people might have been too used to only tagging thong panties with <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a> and not <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a>, since the implication convenience has been in place for so long. Nothing we can do about it. Hopefully the powerhouse taggers and uploaders read the forum + wiki. For now +1 for removing <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> implication.</p>Sal.N/users/337872tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880162013-05-03T12:20:11-04:002013-05-03T12:20:11-04:00@MyrMindservant: > Toks said:
> Generated a list of posts this...<blockquote><p>Toks said:<br>Generated a list of posts this implication added panties or underwear to (at least when jxh initially added it, not accounting for posts that had the g-string tag added afterwards):</p></blockquote><p>That list is not very large, I think I can clean it up manually (which would be more accurate than mass removal) after this issue is resolved. Thanks.</p>MyrMindservant/users/206050tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880122013-05-03T08:41:47-04:002013-05-03T08:44:58-04:00@Toks: > MyrMindservant said:
>
> Plus, if this is...<blockquote>
<p>MyrMindservant said:</p>
<p>Plus, if this is possible, remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/underwear">underwear</a> (but not <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a>) tags that were added as a result of implication requested in this thread.</p>
</blockquote><p>Generated a list of posts this implication added panties or underwear to (at least when jxh initially added it, not accounting for posts that had the g-string tag added afterwards):</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-post-search-link" href="/posts?tags=id%3A1394459%2C1393417%2C1347767%2C1343568%2C1343565%2C1343562%2C1343561%2C1296217%2C1292718%2C1253288%2C1172448%2C1166255%2C1127204%2C1113531%2C1112230%2C1108488%2C1076256%2C1062297%2C1061462%2C1054450%2C1052904%2C1045508%2C1016235%2C1007657%2C1007656%2C973084%2C966949%2C936414%2C924172%2C920198%2C915019%2C913320%2C901849%2C891635%2C890702%2C871146%2C853120%2C833144%2C822007%2C818235%2C798463%2C730290%2C715132%2C682474%2C681806%2C653286%2C518128%2C505178%2C498665%2C430063%2C415375%2C415075%2C408979%2C407984%2C383127%2C366137%2C353844%2C335408%2C329542%2C324438%2C261364%2C249085%2C247318%2C246331%2C220602%2C195154%2C164066%2C149506%2C137538%2C109643%2C106259%2C87839%2C87015%2C34499%2C17079%2C9852%2C8927%20status%3Aany">id:1394459,1393417,1347767,1343568,1343565,1343562,1343561,1296217,1292718,1253288,1172448,1166255,1127204,1113531,1112230,1108488,1076256,1062297,1061462,1054450,1052904,1045508,1016235,1007657,1007656,973084,966949,936414,924172,920198,915019,913320,901849,891635,890702,871146,853120,833144,822007,818235,798463,730290,715132,682474,681806,653286,518128,505178,498665,430063,415375,415075,408979,407984,383127,366137,353844,335408,329542,324438,261364,249085,247318,246331,220602,195154,164066,149506,137538,109643,106259,87839,87015,34499,17079,9852,8927 status:any</a></p>Toks/users/356497tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/880082013-05-03T07:01:07-04:002013-05-03T07:09:24-04:00@MyrMindservant: Uh, I've just noticed that this implication...<p>Uh, I've just noticed that this implication wasn't a good idea, at least so far.</p><p><a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">Thong</a> is currently implicated to <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a>, but <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/g-string">g-string</a> tag can be used to describe lower part of <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong_bikini">thong_bikini</a>. So this implication is adding <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> and consequently <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/underwear">underwear</a> tags to posts where they are not present.</p><p>Alternatively, this problem can be solved by removing <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> implication. This was also previously requested in <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-post-id-link" href="/forum_posts/22780">forum #22780</a> but that thread died without any conclusion.</p><p>So we need to either:<br>1. Remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/g-string">g-string</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a> implication. Plus, if this is possible, remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/underwear">underwear</a> tags that were added as a result of this implication.<br>or<br>2. Remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> implication. Plus, if this is possible, remove <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/panties">panties</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/underwear">underwear</a> (but not <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a>) tags that were added as a result of implication requested in this thread.</p><p>Personally I'm supporting the second option.</p>MyrMindservant/users/206050tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/874262013-04-16T07:13:27-04:002013-04-16T07:13:27-04:00@jxh2154: Done<p>Done</p>jxh2154/users/1309tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/873062013-04-12T04:11:00-04:002013-05-03T22:31:18-04:00@MyrMindservant: Implicating g-string -> thong
Reason: G-string...<p>Implicating <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/g-string">g-string</a> -> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/thong">thong</a></p><p>Reason: G-string is a type of thong.</p>MyrMindservant/users/206050