tag:danbooru.me,2005:/forum_topics/9710Pokemon pool/tag cleanup2018-06-21T12:06:30-04:00tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1481072018-06-21T12:06:30-04:002018-06-21T12:06:30-04:00@nonamethanks: Why not just make the pool addition based on...<p>Why not just make the pool addition based on relevance? If the picture focuses on pokemon then they belong, but if it's just a picture of Hex Maniac's massive breasts with a gastly in the top corner then it shouldn't be added.</p>nonamethanks/users/508240tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/1481062018-06-21T11:56:50-04:002018-06-21T11:56:50-04:00@feline_lump: Bumping this because it was never resolved and...<p>Bumping this because it was never resolved and I've seen even more instances of arbitrary pooling lately. For instance, there's a wall of Hex Maniac images in the Poison pool simply because the artist chose to draw her with a Gastly rather than any other ghost.</p>feline_lump/users/343288tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/907582013-08-10T13:43:25-04:002013-08-10T13:51:04-04:00@S1eth: Yes, briefly. From the Pointless pools thread...<p>Yes, briefly. From the Pointless pools thread (<a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-forum-topic-id-link" href="/forum_topics/8282">topic #8282</a>, page 80)</p><blockquote><p>Nials said:<br>Maybe create 17 different tags going like this : <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/ghost_pokemon" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">ghost_pokemon</a> <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link dtext-wiki-does-not-exist dtext-tag-empty" href="/wiki_pages/poison_pokemon" title="This wiki page does not have a tag">poison_pokemon</a> [ground_pokemon]] and so on? it does seem ridiculous indeed.</p></blockquote><blockquote><p>ghostrigger said:<br>imho, i think there's no need to create tags at that level of identifying <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/pokemon">pokemon</a> with their respective types/elemental powers. it's like classifying <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-3" href="/wiki_pages/naruto">naruto</a> ninjas into fire, lightning, sand, rock, and mist (which we don't do i believe?). i personally think there are enough websites for that.</p></blockquote><blockquote>
<p>feline_lump said:<br>Regarding the Pokemon type pools: they actually do have a valid concept, but have recently been subject to misuse. They are intended to contain images with a focus on a certain type, but this has been stretched to "any picture of any Pokemon with this type". <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/629043">post #629043</a>, <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/911299">post #911299</a>, and <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/663387">post #663387</a> are a few examples of images that belong in these pools.</p>
<p>Personally, I think they should stay, but they need a lot of pruning.</p>
</blockquote><blockquote><p>Rampardos said:<br>I have to agree with ghostrigger's sentiment. There's no reason why you should need to search by type, it's outside the scope of this site. If you want to find a pokemon just search by their tags. I could maybe see some use for them if they were for undeniably type themed pictures and not just a tag to apply to any given picture with a pokemon in it, but even then I'm sure a simple element tag like <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/fire">fire</a> or <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/water">water</a> could be thrown in to find those with a good amount of success.</p></blockquote>S1eth/users/53985tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/907522013-08-10T13:11:57-04:002013-08-10T13:11:57-04:00@SilverSpirit: I think they should be tags as well but I don't...<p>I think they should be tags as well but I don't know if that was discussed already. </p>SilverSpirit/users/366482tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/907512013-08-10T13:06:36-04:002013-08-10T13:06:36-04:00@Toks: Why do these need to be pools? Is there a...<p>Why do these need to be pools? Is there a reason they aren't tags?</p>Toks/users/356497tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/907502013-08-10T12:59:45-04:002013-08-10T13:27:11-04:00@SilverSpirit: Shouldn't we discuss this a bit more? If only...<p>Shouldn't we discuss this a bit more? If only because that leaves some of the pools quite empty. When I search those pools it's because I'm looking for a picture of a specific type of pokemon. Fire pokemon for example, I want to be able to look through several pictures of just fire pokemon not just some where there a couple of fire pokemon in the picture. Same goes for the gym leader and elite four tags, I want to be able to look through gym leader pictures regardless of what they're doing in the picture.</p>SilverSpirit/users/366482tag:danbooru.me,2005:ForumPost/907452013-08-10T10:08:36-04:002013-08-10T13:38:07-04:00@S1eth: With XY around the corner, I notice some people...<p>With XY around the corner, I notice some people going crazy with pooling pokemon images again. Some of this has already been discussed before in the pointless pools thread, but the pools require some pruning.</p><p>See <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link" href="/wiki_pages/pool_group%3Apokemon">pool group:pokemon</a> for the list of pokemon pools.</p><p>Suggested clean up:</p><p>Pokemon - Type: <<Type>> pools:</p><p>Use only for images of groups of (3 or more) pokemon of the same type, or with a clear focus on that type.<br>Remove all images that just depict <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/solo">solo</a> pokemon.</p><p>Pokemon - <<Region>> Gym Leaders </p><p>Use only for groups of gym leaders. (possibly merge them into 1 pool)<br>Restrict the <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/gym_leader">gym leader</a> and <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/elite_four">elite four</a> tags to actually relevant images. We know that character X is a canon gym leader, but this information is not useful if the image does not depict them while they are working. We gain nothing from <a class="dtext-link dtext-id-link dtext-post-id-link" href="/posts/1456034">post #1456034</a> being tagged <a class="dtext-link dtext-wiki-link tag-type-0" href="/wiki_pages/gym_leader">gym leader</a></p>S1eth/users/53985