Danbooru

[APPROVED] Unimply ribbon_bondage -> bondage

Posted under Tags

remove implication ribbon_bondage -> bondage

Link to request

Bondage is only used for sexual play, but ribbon_bondage should also apply to tied-up posts like post #2940809.
Unless I'm missing a tag, similar to ribbon bondage but for non sexual play, this implication should be removed.

The missing implication from shibari to bondage delivers the exact same reason. This post I've presented is never a bdsm post which is implied by bondage.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1410 (forum #140021) has been approved by @NWF_Renim.

Updated by DanbooruBot

kuuderes_shadow said:

It should probably imply bound instead.

I guess it doesn't because bondage is doing that already.
But you have a point.

One moment....or not. This request is only available after this implication is approved.

Bump

I kinda agree that the implication shouldn't be there (for both tags) and should instead be added when fitting.

kuuderes_shadow said:

Really? I'd have expected far more than that. And there are certainly more than just a handful of things that want to stay in bondage rating:s, although of course also plenty that don't.

Well, tied up is far more restrictive than bondage. Tied up is only to be used when there is nothing sexual going on in that instance. Had to change some post to rating s while I went through that, but it weren't that many.
I'd say bondage still fits for post #3007072 (latest post) but not really tied up.

  • 1