Aliasing slender_waist -> narrow_waist.

Reason: Same idea; narrow waist has a wiki definition.

Or reversed.

It seemed to me when reading forum #42915 and looking at the tag's contents that narrow_waist was meant for curvy bodies that had an abnormally small waist by comparison.

If possible I'd like to restrict narrow_waist to cases where the waist is small by contrast, i.e. very curvy character (post #629034) or impossibly small waist (post #1005039), and have slender_waist for bodies that have more balance (post #998433, post #910894, post #976048).

A distinction is okay but will take some monitoring. And wikis. Maybe a renaming of narrow_waist, even perhaps adding a "very" to it.

I support having very narrow waist, because merely narrow waist does not make justice to the extreme narrowness of the post #1005039.

If it isn't covered by narrow_waist, it's bad anatomy.

S1eth said:
If it isn't covered by narrow_waist, it's bad anatomy.

We have other subsets of bad anatomy, though, like bad hands.

We have slender_waist for more realistic waists and narrow_waist for more cartoony waists like post #1005039. Adding even more granularity is splitting hairs.

Resurrecting this thread to clarify;

Are slender_waist & narrow_waist being kept as two discrete tags?

There is no wiki definition for slender_waist

P.S. - I agree with Hillside Moose about not splitting those tags further

P.S.S. - There are currently 8 tags using the waist tag.
Is waist used to identify waists on-sight,similar to midriff and navel?

is narrow_waist independent of hips and waist tags?

and in case narrow_waist is indeed limited to cartoonish waist, it might need some major cleaning as many may fall to the realistic slender_waist instead.

and imho, the waist tag could be the 'perfect' placeholder for the pool #4305 perfect waist (which hopefully should be deleted anytime soon, forum #71062)

I thought non-descriptive bodypart tags was for images where said bodypart is a major focus of the image (with the exception of breasts, which is more of a size issue). e.g. Legs, ass. hands, and face.

i.e. Waist would only be used when the waist is an important focus of the image. I'm not sure that really applies to most images in the tag currently. Maybe some in the "Perfect Waist" pool, but I find that pool highly subjective to the point of almost meaninglessness, much like the "Perfect Ass" pool which has no clear standards.

As for narrow waist, I think that would be semi-independent of hips and waist because those may not necessarily be the focus of an image in which someone has a waist "approximately 2/5 the width of their hips, and simultaneously noticeably narrower than their chest."

For slender waist, I think its main utility would be in depicting slender girls with a waist that is slimmer than their hips and shoulders but not cartoonishly so.