Danbooru

Tag Implications: pantyshot_(*) -> pantyshot, *

Posted under General

create implication pantyshot_(standing) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(standing) -> standing
create implication pantyshot_(lying) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(lying) -> lying
create implication pantyshot_(squatting) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(squatting) -> squatting
create implication pantyshot_(kneeling) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(kneeling) -> kneeling

Reason: Subsets.

And these implications are already in place, listed for completeness:
pantyshot_(sitting) -> pantyshot
pantyshot_(sitting) -> sitting

Updated by jxh2154

Well for now I'm doing the implications. Removing the tags later will be easier if the implications are already in place because then we'll know they all have pantyshot + position in place.

  • 1