According to the link in the commentary, the namesakes of the three were flipped states. So I don't think it's meant to reflect the artist's views, unless anyone from the Pacific team has anything to say?
According to the link in the commentary, the namesakes of the three were flipped states. So I don't think it's meant to reflect the artist's views, unless anyone from the Pacific team has anything to say?
As far as I know, most of them are actually non-American, and the American member has expressed they will stay neutral on it.
Not sure how you'd jump to that conclusion, as any user can add and remove tags on images. The user who added them to the post seems to have a history of bad tagging.
Won't say anything about my leaning on the elections, but since they are over we should give the man a chance to prove or disprove himself to the world. Who knows? He might actually be a cause for good? (please don't argue about it, I am merely saying I hope that will be the case, not that I can see the future)
And the obvious tenor of the link’s commentary is so obviously triumphant for Trump, I’d say it’s rather plain that this is meant to reflect the artist’s views.
You knew that, of course.
Because your point was to try and intimidate the artist by gas-lighting and intimating that you were “offended”.
Grow up.
“Rooting for Trump” in the real world is actually rather uncontroversial, especially in America. The only thing controversial is that many on the Left will typically try to harm people who do so, from public beatings to rioting across the nation. Generally speaking, normal people in every country don't like that you do this.
That considered, it's rather normal to find someone in any walk of life who roots for Trump.
Grow up.
...
Did you seriously just assume my political views?
No, I did not know. I was merely saying I wasn't sure and was looking for official word from a member of the Pacific team.
In what way was I trying to intimidate the artist? How does my sincere desire to avoid assuming the artist's views lead you to think I was offended? Where and how I was trying to do that? Show me. I never said anything of the sort. How is any of what I'm saying right-bashing? I don't see how what I was saying can be construed as such.
I asked a sincere question. You were the one who jumped in and attacked me out of nowhere.
As long as the users aren't attacking other users or people and keep their opinions to a civil discussion then it is fine to have disagreements and disagree on subjects. If it turns into nothing more than attacks and name calling though, it will eventually lead to bans, as that is not the kind of environment we wish to have on this site. Also spamming memes or pointless comments like "first" will get you in trouble as well.
As for comments, we generally do not delete comments, but users can and will down vote comments. The default threshold is a score below 0 resulting in comments being hidden, but users can change the threshold at which this kicks in. As most users though will not have changed this, receiving a score of -1 or lower will mean for most users your comment will be hidden from view unless a user clicks to have all messages revealed.
[...] and it sounds like you've let this miscreant off the hook before [...]
Comments, post changes, and various other activities are recorded in the user's profile. This is the first time I've come across this user or at least noticed him, but I'm still readily able to look at his profile and see the various tag changes he has made during his time here. Given what I've seen of the tag edits he's made, I've left a comment in his record that he needs to improve his tagging and warned him that tags are meant to cover things seen in the image, not cover their personal feelings of the content in it.
You're working far, far too hard to troll people over assumptions of alignment you dug up about a couple non-aligned questions and your own misunderstanding of the site's mechanics.
Sakuri_Kunikai said: I'm pretty sure Trump's wearing a Gilgamesh cosplay, not the God Emperor of Mankind.
Nah, while it lacks a lot of the ornateness (and EAGLES) of Empty's armor, it does have the right pauldron being ornate and the emblem on the chest-plate.
Won't say anything about my leaning on the elections, but since they are over we should give the man a chance to prove or disprove himself to the world. Who knows? He might actually be a cause for good?
Haha, nope. Unless you count him being a cautionary tale for other countries (GJ netherlands).
Anticipating this going into the harsher in hindsight pool any month now.