create implication sparkle_background -> sparkle
create implication sparkle_print -> sparkle
Posted under Tags
create implication sparkle_background -> sparkle
create implication sparkle_print -> sparkle
A quick glance at those tags turns up images like post #1739584 and post #2231906 with concave starlike shapes that look a lot more like diamonds than brief flashes of reflected light (which is what I take the sparkle tag to mean). I don't think it's a good idea to label images like post #1420212 with the same tag that we use for post #1503952.
iridescent_slime said:
A quick glance at those tags turns up images like post #1739584 and post #2231906 with concave starlike shapes that look a lot more like diamonds than brief flashes of reflected light (which is what I take the sparkle tag to mean). I don't think it's a good idea to label images like post #1420212 with the same tag that we use for post #1503952.
For those individual cases, would it be better to replace the sparkle_print tag with something more suitable, like diamond_print then? Because if so, I can do that - there are only a few in those tags anyways. Or maybe argyle_print, whichever seems more appropriate.
Edit:Actually, nevermind about argyle_print, it looks completely different.
Updated
You formatted this incorrectly. The request has brackets in it.
The bulk update request #511 has been rejected.
albert said:
You formatted this incorrectly. The request has brackets in it.
Does that mean if I had formatted it correctly, it would've been accepted? Or would it still have been rejected for the reasons iridescent slime mentioned above? Sorry if this should be obvious.