Danbooru

[bulk] Chocolate

Posted under Tags

Xabid

I'm unsure about the implication from chocolate cake to chocolate, although some of this is that I'm not really sure I understand what the chocolate tag is meant to cover -- to me, it evokes more "pure" chocolate like chocolate sauce or chocolate bars, rather than covering any processed food containing chocolate flavoring. Should an image with chocolate ice-cream in it be tagged chocolate? Would the tag be more useful that way, or less?

Although looking at the wiki for chocolate, none of the "related" things imply chocolate. Some of them obviously should (chocolate_bar, chocolate_syrup), but what about chocolate_cornet, where the chocolate might not be visible? Hrm.

Anyway, if the chocolate_cake -> chocolate implication is added, most of the other things listed under "see also" on the Chocolate wiki page should probably get it, too.

user 460797

Xabid said:

I'm unsure about the implication from chocolate cake to chocolate, although some of this is that I'm not really sure I understand what the chocolate tag is meant to cover -- to me, it evokes more "pure" chocolate like chocolate sauce or chocolate bars, rather than covering any processed food containing chocolate flavoring. Should an image with chocolate ice-cream in it be tagged chocolate? Would the tag be more useful that way, or less?

Although looking at the wiki for chocolate, none of the "related" things imply chocolate. Some of them obviously should (chocolate_bar, chocolate_syrup), but what about chocolate_cornet, where the chocolate might not be visible? Hrm.

Anyway, if the chocolate_cake -> chocolate implication is added, most of the other things listed under "see also" on the Chocolate wiki page should probably get it, too.

Probably, yes. I just happened to stumble over one post that had a chocolate cake but I had to add all three tags manually. And since it's the main ingredient (or that one that is most associated with a chocolate cake (I don't want to imply egg, if you know what I mean^^). But since you can see the chocolate on a chocolate cake, it should be ok. Otherwise it's just a random cake.

EB

I'm not sure if a lot of those implications would be good. What if the syrup or bar is in distinctive packaging, but no actual chocolate is visible? One tag that is already implicated, chocolate_heart, is misused on a lot on images that should be heart-shaped_box instead (haven't had the time to clean that one up other than the examples I happen to come across).

user 460797

EB said:

I'm not sure if a lot of those implications would be good. What if the syrup or bar is in distinctive packaging, but no actual chocolate is visible? One tag that is already implicated, chocolate_heart, is misused on a lot on images that should be heart-shaped_box instead (haven't had the time to clean that one up other than the examples I happen to come across).

Do you have an example where there is a misuse for the cske here?

user 460797

EB said:

Huh, "cske"? What did you mean?

post #2279665: heart-shaped box is being held by Mira, while a chocolate_heart is in Elizabeth's mouth.
post #2278022: Example of a post I had to correct. There is no chocolate visible.

Ah, no, no, I mean for the cake because it seems you don't want this implication or did I totally misunderstood you^^. Btw. this seems to be a typo since "s" and "a" are very near together on the keyboard.
And since it's a cake I don't think there is much misuse on this one.

EB

As far as chocolate cake goes, I think Xabid has a point. I'm not sure if I'd use the chocolate tag so broadly. But if we are, chocolate cake implications should be fine.

  • 1