Posted under Tags
create implication body_blush -> blush
I believe there's a reason against this obvious implication but if nose_blush implicates blush, why not this one. I read the blush wki page and it isn't stated there that blushing could not refer to other body parts then cheeks.
Talked about it topic #7251 about 4 years ago. Drawing @Hillside_Moose here, since he was one of the main objectors.
Well, I think this topic will pop up eventually after a few months again. I didn't read any real reason there but I can live with the implication being rejected but then the blush wiki should explicitely state that it's only used when the characters blushes on the face and not on the shoulders.
So post #2083170 would never qualify then for the blush tag.
Blush is one of those terms where a native speaker would reasonably assume refers to a facial reddening. Reason why it's called "body_blush" is because we don't have any other good ideas to call a rosy glow to a character's body.
Again, you're too focused on semantics and hierarchies rather than practicality.
-1
Hillside_Moose said:
Again, you're too focused on semantics and hierarchies rather than practicality.
-1
Meh, don't think so. It's rather a lack of non using english that much^^.
Provence said:
Meh, don't think so. It's rather a lack of non using english that much^^.
I know. I realized you weren't a native speaker when I noticed most of your implication reasons are based on literal interpretations, leading to a lot of "Reason: Obvious" when a bit of scratching would find exceptions. It's why I tell people to actually look at the tags and see if the patterns between both intersect before suggesting an implication.
The tag implication body_blush -> blush has been rejected.
