BlindSargent said:
I think those are her fingers on that color and not any kind of gloves.
Yep. For she is a dragon-descent (IIRC).
Posted under Tags
BlindSargent said:
I think those are her fingers on that color and not any kind of gloves.
Yep. For she is a dragon-descent (IIRC).
Should an image be tagged female_pov if the character is known to be female from elsewhere but there's nothing in the image/part of the image in question to directly show that they are? Referring to the top large panel of post #2390171
kuuderes_shadow said:
Should an image be tagged female_pov if the character is known to be female from elsewhere but there's nothing in the image/part of the image in question to directly show that they are? Referring to the top large panel of post #2390171
I think it's alright. As long the said "pov female" character is mentioned elsewhere in the same image. If there is no mention or anything, just use pov (pov_hands to be more specific). If there are no visible limbs, use looking_at_viewer instead.
For post #2391086, what's the tag for the rubber band for the hair that they're holding? Also I tagged this with adjusting_hair, but I'm not sure that's the correct tag.
Blue_Stuff said:
For post #2391086, what's the tag for the rubber band for the hair that they're holding? Also I tagged this with adjusting_hair, but I'm not sure that's the correct tag.
probably a hair_tie.
Sacriven said:
Although it's good to have a specific tag for it, personally I against it. "breast under clothing" is too vague, for a micro_bikini is still considered as clothing.
You can use breasts -nipples -cleavage if you want pics with breast outline visible from clothes (although several undertagged pics with cleavage will inevitably appear).
What about just breast_outline?
chodorov said:
What about just breast_outline?
To be honest, for me that tag is unnecessary. But, if other users found it acceptable and reaching a consensus, why not? For now, I'll just wait other users and mods' opinion.
============
post #2391299
her upper garment.
Updated
Sacriven said:
post #2391299
her upper garment.
It appears to be a bodysuit or at least one of the variants.
post #2391299
her upper garment.
crop_top halter_top
bodysuit should be one-piece garment.
============
post #2391346
fishnets-like thighhighs (the out-frame girl and on-knee girl)
post #2380157
The white cloth at her back. cape? shawl? I've seen it on some dancing costume but not sure what it is.
Blue_Stuff said:
For post #2391086, what's the tag for the rubber band for the hair that they're holding? Also I tagged this with adjusting_hair, but I'm not sure that's the correct tag.
zeparoh said:
post #2391346
fishnets-like thighhighs (the out-frame girl and on-knee girl)post #2380157
The white cloth at her back. cape? shawl? I've seen it on some dancing costume but not sure what it is.
It's just the top part, same with the gloves. I don't think we have a tag for this.
That's a shawl, fastened to the arms in several places.
Isn't that what the "Uncommonly styled legwear" pool is for?
Provence said:
Isn't that what the "Uncommonly styled legwear" pool is for?
hah, thanks. I totally forget about that Pool.
post #2392281
What kind of bra is that?
Sacriven said:
post #2392281
What kind of bra is that?
Does this count as frills?
Personally, I'd say it's a layered_bikini^^.
Oh, didn't know that one.
Thanks guys
===================
post #2392604
her gesture? it's kinda like fox_shadow_puppet, but I'm not sure.
Sacriven said:
Thanks guys
===================
post #2392604
her gesture? it's kinda like fox_shadow_puppet, but I'm not sure.
What's that black thing she's wearing(?) ?
post #2392712