Should it apply in this case (NSFW/Guro: post #2929789) and other such instances where there's a shirt with no_pants?

chinatsu said:

Should it apply in this case (NSFW/Guro: post #2929789) and other such instances where there's a shirt with no_pants?

I guess every item that can look like a dress/skirt should fit here.
that still does exclude shorts, but it does include short kimonos and skimpy outfits like these. A dress shirt would also fit if it's long enough.

BrokenEagle98 said:

it's good to have solid definite boundaries

You ask, you shall receive: a thighhighs(over kneehighs)/bare thighs (part of legs between knees and buttocks)/outer (not underwear) clothes combination. No visible panties, underwear or parts of body usually kept under clothes (ass, hips, pussy etc).

chinatsu said:

Should it apply in this case (NSFW/Guro: post #2929789) and other such instances where there's a shirt with no_pants?

But it looks to me this no_pants tag applies to the girl on the left anyway, the one from right has legit ZR (her uniform is doing fine job covering everything that should be covered).