create implication rifle_on_back -> rifle

Link to implication

EDIT: This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The tag implication rifle_on_back -> rifle (forum #139708) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

-1

There are only ten posts and Im not sure post #2804438 counts as a rifle.

Too few posts, too specific. There's weapon_on_back, sword_behind_back, and knife_behind_back.

I think all can just be rolled up into weapon_behind_back. Really all the precision you are looking for is already found with rifle weapon_on_back.

create alias sword_behind_back -> weapon_on_back
create alias knife_behind_back -> weapon_on_back

Link to request

(explained in prior post)

EDIT: This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1404 (forum #139779) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

chinatsu said:

create alias sword_behind_back -> weapon_on_back
create alias knife_behind_back -> weapon_on_back

Link to request

(explained in prior post)

What about the likes of post #2882211?

The sword is both very definitely behind her back and also very definitely not on it.

chinatsu said:

create alias sword_behind_back -> weapon_on_back
create alias knife_behind_back -> weapon_on_back

Link to request

(explained in prior post)

Oh no. Knife/sword behind back mean people are holding their blades behind their back.
Sword on back is the one you want. There are only twenty posts so that should be purged manually.

Also knifes are not automatically weapons even if someone is carrying them on their back.

kuuderes_shadow said:

What about the likes of post #2882211?

The sword is both very definitely behind her back and also very definitely not on it.

Looks clearly behind her back to me.

ion288 said:

Oh no. Knife/sword behind back mean people are holding their blades behind their back.
Sword on back is the one you want. There are only twenty posts so that should be purged manually.

As in, worn on their back?

Also knifes are not automatically weapons even if someone is carrying them on their back.

Any examples a knife held behind someone that does not make it a weapon?

Weapon on back clearly states it is for weapons worn on the back.

post #2876533 where she appears to be juggling.

chinatsu said:

Looks clearly behind her back to me.

Exactly. And something behind the back is no more on their back than something above their head is on their head.

This tag implication has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The tag implication rifle_on_back -> rifle (forum #139708) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 60 days.

The bulk update request #1404 (forum #139779) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.