Posted under Tags
The tag implication #9187 fate/extella_link -> fate/extella has been approved.
Reason: Fate/Extella Link is the sequel to Fate/Extella.
EDIT: The tag implication fate/extella_link -> fate/extella (forum #156511) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
Updated by DanbooruBot
The tag implication fate/extella_link -> fate/extella (forum #156511) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.
This gives us a daisy chain of fate/extella link -> fate/extella -> fate/extra -> fate (series). Is it really necessary to have this many copyright tags for one game?
Compare this with Fate/hollow ataraxia, which doesn't imply Fate/stay night. Normally we avoid implying sequels to the base game.
I just saw fate/extella -> fate/extra and fate/extra ccc -> fate/extra and thought that was the norm. Maybe we can detach the link from extella to extra? I always thought while it's a continuation of extra, extella has become its own thing.
What exactly is the relationship between these games? I haven't played them so I'm not familiar. For what it's worth, the Type-Moon wiki categorizes them like this:
I think that's the correct hierarchy. I think CCC is another route for Extra and CCC Fox tail is another route for CCC and Extella is a continuation of Extra and then Extella Link is definitely sequel to Extella. I'm not 100% sure but this is what I gathered.
