Danbooru

Loli/shota check thread.

Posted under General

Needing a little help regarding the posting of 3d loli images.

While 3d loli is allowed on here from what I can see most those girls tend to have a sort of doll face look to them. Even those images with more realistic looking skin and body proportions such as post #2013803.

Now I am starting to see 3d images on Pixiv that are looking alot more real and I am wondering wheter or not the posting of these are allowed on Danbooru.

A few examples:
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/78826844

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/79119624

Jigsy said:

Now that I think about it, shouldn't this thread be stickied?

It’s in the already stickied Useful threads index (topic #8235) (that probably nobody reads).

kittey said:

It’s in the already stickied Useful threads index (topic #8235) (that probably nobody reads).

I do...:3
Because the forum's search function is quite crappy.

post #3775467
I first rated the image as safe, but then someone changed it to explicit. I then changed to questionable, but what do you guys think? If it's a safe image it can't be tagged loli, right?

She is toples and covering her breasts, I would say Questionable. Not entirely sure she qualify as a loli though.

Zurreak said:

There's a bit of a disagreement over post #2821662 that I'm not sure about one way or the other.

I'm inclined to say no.

Zurreak said:

There's a bit of a disagreement over post #2821662 that I'm not sure about one way or the other.

Lilina is obviously teenaged, and I agree that Roy doesn't look any younger than her.

Speaking of teenagers, aren't the teenage and loli tags on post #3783547 a contradiction? Which should it be? She has high head/body ratio, but significant pubic hair.

Edit: Same issue with post #3783563. Her body shape looks quite loli there.

Flopsy said:

Speaking of teenagers, aren't the teenage and loli tags on post #3783547 a contradiction?

From the looks of other posts, isn’t she canonically teenaged anyway? In that case, the teenage tag doesn’t make sense at all.

post #2318923 used to be tagged just child but now it's been tagged as loli. I don't see any reason for this, it was just child for the longest time and there's no sexual content.

guywholikesanim said:

post #2318923 used to be tagged just child but now it's been tagged as loli. I don't see any reason for this, it was just child for the longest time and there's no sexual content.

It's actually gone back and forth a few times over the years. Personally, I think the splash censoring here is itself just suggestive to make this borderline loli. It draws more attention to her chest than if it weren't censored in the first place, kind of like all the micro_bikini loli posts that look more sexualized than they would if they were simply naked.

iridescent_slime said:

It's actually gone back and forth a few times over the years. Personally, I think the splash censoring here is itself just suggestive to make this borderline loli. It draws more attention to her chest than if it weren't censored in the first place, kind of like all the micro_bikini loli posts that look more sexualized than they would if they were simply naked.

True. It's like how some of the pictures in the Artistic Nudes pool have censoring, which kinda defeats the purpose of it being an artistic nude.

On a side note, maybe it shouldn't be in the Loli vs. Child section of the loli tag's wiki page, given how much it goes back and forth.